IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr12/207113.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-vehicle Collisions involving Large Trucks on Highways: An Exploratory Discrete Outcome Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • E.I.T, Mouyid Islam
  • Hernandez, Salvador

Abstract

Trucking industry is considered a driving force for logistic and supply chain systems which indirectly influences the national economy. So, any impedance in truck-flow or supply chain system eventually brings substantial consequences in terms of monetary values. As such, a growing concern related to large-truck (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) greater than 10,000 pounds) crashes has increased in recent years due to the potential economic impacts and level of injury severity sustained. With this in mind, this study aims to analyze the injury severities of multi-vehicle collisions involving large-trucks through an advanced econometric modeling approach to shed light on the contributing factors leading to large-truck crashes. Through a fused national crash datasets, we hope to provide a clearer understanding of the complex interactions of contributing factors (e.g., factors related to human (drivers), vehicle, and road-environment) influencing multi-vehicle crash outcomes. To capture these complexities using the national crash database and understand the underlying causal factor, discrete outcome models namely random parameter ordered probit and mixed logit (which accounts for observable factors) were estimated to predict the likelihood of five injury severity outcomes—fatal, incapacitating, non-incapacitating, possible injury, and no injury. Estimation findings indicate that the level of injury severity is highly influenced by a number of complex interactions of factors and that the effect of the some of the factors can vary across the observations.

Suggested Citation

  • E.I.T, Mouyid Islam & Hernandez, Salvador, 2012. "Multi-vehicle Collisions involving Large Trucks on Highways: An Exploratory Discrete Outcome Analysis," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207113, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr12:207113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207113/files/2012_111_Collisions_Trucks_Highways_Analysis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhat, Chandra R., 2001. "Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 677-693, August.
    2. Bhat, Chandra R., 2003. "Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 837-855, November.
    3. Brownstone, David & Train, Kenneth, 1998. "Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 109-129, November.
    4. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, August.
    5. Geweke, John & Keane, Michael P & Runkle, David, 1994. "Alternative Computational Approaches to Inference in the Multinomial Probit Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(4), pages 609-632, November.
    6. Steven Stern, 1997. "Simulation-Based Estimation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 2006-2039, December.
    7. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    8. Stewart Jones & David A. Hensher, 2007. "Evaluating the Behavioural Performance of Alternative Logit Models: An Application to Corporate Takeovers Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7-8), pages 1193-1220.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr12:207113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.