IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277043.html

Grape Supply and Implicit Prices for Wine Quality Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Schamel, G.

Abstract

We analyze how grape supply may determine implicit prices for organic wine and regional denominations. We analyze three grape supply chains and the related wine quality they produce: cooperatives, own-growing and mixed-sourcing. Cooperatives have their grapes supplied by their member growers. Own-growers are making wine exclusively from their own-grown grapes. Mixed-sourcing describes wineries that use own-grown grapes and contract-grapes from independent growers. Cooperative producers face the challenge to raise grape and subsequent wine quality (e.g. setting appropriate incentives that induce their members to grow high quality grapes through vineyard management and grape pricing schemes). We analyze data on retail prices, wine quality evaluations, winery reputation indicators, organic production and regional denomination rules (DOC, IGT). Using a hedonic model, we show that wines from cooperatives may command a price (or reputation) premium relative to wines from private producers and we observe specialized grape supply chains with price premiums for DOC wine from cooperatives, IGT denominated wine from own-growing wineries and organic wine from mixed sourcing and own-growing producers. We confirm that cooperatives may gain a price premium in the market. Moreover, we show that the price premium for organic wine may depend on specialized grape supply chains. Acknowledgement : Special thanks are due to the authors of l Espresso Wine Guide and the Chamber of Commerce of the Province of Bozen-Bolzano for providing access to the data analyzed in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Schamel, G., 2018. "Grape Supply and Implicit Prices for Wine Quality Attributes," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277043, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277043
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277043/files/719.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corsi, Alessandro & Strøm, Steinar, 2013. "The Price Premium for Organic Wines: Estimating a Hedonic Farm-Gate Price Equation," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 29-48, May.
    2. Bernd Frick, 2004. "Does Ownership Matter? Empirical Evidence from the German Wine Industry," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 357-386, August.
    3. Albaek, Svend & Schultz, Christian, 1998. "On the relative advantage of cooperatives," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 397-401, June.
    4. Peter Bogetoft, 2005. "An information economic rationale for cooperatives," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(2), pages 191-217, June.
    5. George W. J. Hendrikse, 2007. "On the co-existence of spot and contract markets: the delivery requirement as contract externality," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 34(2), pages 257-282, June.
    6. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    7. Günter Schamel, 2007. "Auction markets for specialty food products with geographical indications," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(2‐3), pages 257-264, September.
    8. Delmas, Magali A. & Grant, Laura E., 2008. "Eco-Labeling Strategies: The Eco-Premium Puzzle In The Wine Industry," Working Papers 37325, American Association of Wine Economists.
    9. Schamel, Günter, 2009. "Dynamic Analysis of Brand and Regional Reputation: The Case of Wine," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 62-80, April.
    10. Dieter Pennerstorfer & Christoph R. Weiss, 2013. "Product quality in the agri-food chain: do cooperatives offer high-quality wine?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(1), pages 143-162, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Kai & Zhou, Jie-hong & Liang, Qiao & Huang, Zuhui, 2015. "Food safety controls and governance structure varieties in China's vegetable and fruit sector," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212046, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Liang, Qiao & Hendrikse, George, 2016. "Pooling and the yardstick effect of cooperatives," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 97-105.
    3. Pennerstorfer, Dieter & Weiss, Christoph R., "undated". "Do Cooperatives Offer High Quality Products? Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Wine Market," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115741, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Megan E. Waldrop & Jill J. McCluskey & Ron C. Mittelhammer, 2017. "Products with multiple certifications: insights from the US wine market," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(4), pages 658-682.
    5. Stefano Castriota, 2018. "Does Excellence Pay Off? Evidence from the Wine Market," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS49, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    6. Pennerstorfer, Dieter & Weiss, Christoph R., 2007. "Do Cooperatives Offer High Quality Products?," 103rd Seminar, April 23-25, 2007, Barcelona, Spain 9403, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Hansen, Rebecca & Hess, Sebastian, "undated". "Vermarkten Winzergenossenschaften weniger erfolgreich als andere Unternehmensformen? Hedonische Preisanalysen im Modellvergleich," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317050, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    8. Hansen, Rebecca & Hess, Sebastian, 2021. "Are German Wine Cooperatives Less Successful at Marketing Their Wines Than Other Types of Organisation? A Comparison of Models Using Hedonic Price Analysis," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315155, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Höhler, Julia & Hildenbrand, Andreas, 2015. "Weinqualität in unterschiedlichen Organisationsformen: Warum schneiden Genossenschaften oft schlechter ab?," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209256, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    10. Staudigel, Matthias & Trubnikov, Aleksej, 2022. "High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(02), January.
    11. Sun, Lin & Gómez, Miguel I. & Chaddad, Fabio R. & Ross, R. Brent, 2014. "Distribution Channel Choices of Wineries in Emerging Cool Climate Regions," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 87-103, April.
    12. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    13. Schneider, Nathan, 2018. "An Internet of Ownership: Democratic Design for the Online Economy," OSF Preprints 2xyst, Center for Open Science.
    14. Carew, Richard C. & Florkowski, Wojciech J. & Meng, Ting, 2016. "Segmenting Wine Market: California Red and White Wine Retail Prices in British Columbia," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235253, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Bogetoft, Peter, 2021. "How upstream cooperatives limit downstream holdups," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-168.
    16. Schneider, Nathan, 2021. "Enabling Community-Owned Platforms: A Proposal for a Tech New Deal," OSF Preprints cp459, Center for Open Science.
    17. López-Bayón, Susana & González-Díaz, Manuel & Solís-Rodríguez, Vanesa & Fernández-Barcala, Marta, 2018. "Governance decisions in the supply chain and quality performance: The synergistic effect of geographical indications and ownership structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    19. Anna Carbone & Luca Cacchiarelli & Valentina Sabbatini, 2018. "Exploring quality and its value in the Italian olive oil market: a panel data analysis," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Wakuo Saito & Teruo Nakatsuma, 2021. "Hierarchical Bayesian Hedonic Regression Analysis of Japanese Rice Wine: Price is Right?," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2021-019, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.