IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae15/211343.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial Heterogeneity in Production Functions Models

Author

Listed:
  • Sille, AG
  • Salvioni, C.
  • Benedetti, R.

Abstract

Controlling for unobserved heterogeneity is a fundamental challenge in empirical research, as failing to do so can introduce omitted variables biases and preclude causal inference. In this paper we develop an innovative method – the Iterative Geographically Weighted Regression (IGWR) method – to identify clusters of farms that follow a similar local production econometric model, taking explicitly unobserved spatial heterogeneity into account. The proposed method is the perfect combination of the GWR approach and the adaptive weights smoothing (AWS) procedure. This method is applied to regional samples of olive growing farms in Italy. The main finding is that the conditional global IGWR model fits the data best, proving that explicitly accounting for unobserved spatial heterogeneity is of crucial importance when modeling the production function of firms particularly for those operating in land based industries

Suggested Citation

  • Sille, AG & Salvioni, C. & Benedetti, R., 2015. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Production Functions Models," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211343, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae15:211343
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.211343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/211343/files/Bill_-Detecting%20Spatial%20Heterogeneity%20in%20Production%20Functions%20Models-783.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mundlak, Yair & Butzer, Rita & Larson, Donald F., 2012. "Heterogeneous technology and panel data: The case of the agricultural production function," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 139-149.
    2. C. J. O'Donnell & W. E. Griffiths, 2006. "Estimating State-Contingent Production Frontiers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(1), pages 249-266.
    3. Daniel P. McMillen & Christian L. Redfearn, 2010. "Estimation And Hypothesis Testing For Nonparametric Hedonic House Price Functions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 712-733, August.
    4. Yair Mundlak & René Hellinghausen, 1982. "The Intercountry Agricultural Production Function: Another View," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(4), pages 664-672.
    5. Luis Orea & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2004. "Efficiency measurement using a latent class stochastic frontier model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 169-183, January.
    6. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    7. Antonio Alvarez & Julio del Corral, 2010. "Identifying different technologies using a latent class model: extensive versus intensive dairy farms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 231-250, June.
    8. Ariel Dinar & Giannis Karagiannis & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 2007. "Evaluating the impact of agricultural extension on farms' performance in Crete: a nonneutral stochastic frontier approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(2), pages 135-146, March.
    9. J. Polzehl & V. G. Spokoiny, 2000. "Adaptive weights smoothing with applications to image restoration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(2), pages 335-354.
    10. Lau, Lawrence J. & Yotopoulos, Pan A., 1989. "The meta-production function approach to technological change in world agriculture," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 241-269, October.
    11. Johannes Sauer & Catherine J. Morrison Paul, 2013. "The empirical identification of heterogeneous technologies and technical change," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 1461-1479, April.
    12. Greene, William, 2005. "Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 269-303, June.
    13. Atkinson, Anthony B & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1969. "A New View of Technological Change," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 79(315), pages 573-578, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marusca De Castris & Daniele Di Gennaro, 2018. "Does agricultural subsidies foster Italian southern farms? A Spatial Quantile Regression Approach," Papers 1803.05659, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae15:211343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.