IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudaeb/186194.html

Issues in the Development and Marketing of Reduced Chemical Agricultural Products: A Look at Disease-Resistant Apple Cultivars

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy, Cecile
  • Schertz Willett, Lois

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy, Cecile & Schertz Willett, Lois, 1991. "Issues in the Development and Marketing of Reduced Chemical Agricultural Products: A Look at Disease-Resistant Apple Cultivars," EB Series 186194, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudaeb:186194
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.186194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/186194/files/Cornell_AEM_eb9134.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.186194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:jagaec:v:20:y:1988:i:01:p:1-11_02 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. David Brookshire & Thomas Crocker, 1981. "The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 235-252, January.
    3. Joseph D. Brown, 1969. "Effect of a Health Hazard "Scare" on Consumer Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(3), pages 676-678.
    4. Batie, Sandra S., 1988. "Agriculture As The Problem: New Agendas And New Opportunities," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(01), pages 1-11, July.
    5. van Ravenswaay, Eileen, 1989. "The Food Industry Responds to Consumers' Pesticide Fears," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 12(3), September.
    6. Cook, Roberta, 1990. "The food safety controversy: Implications for the fresh produce industry," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326678, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    7. Steven F. Edwards & Glen D. Anderson, 1987. "Overlooked Biases in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Some Considerations," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 63(2), pages 168-178.
    8. Anderson, Bruce L., 1989. "Strategic Alternatives for the New York Apple Industry," Research Bulletins 183316, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    9. Smith, Hugh M. & Frye, Robert E., 1964. "How Color of Red Delicious Apples Affects Their Sales," Marketing Research Reports 313325, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    10. Schoorl, D. & Holt, J. E., 1983. "An analysis of the effect of quality on prices of horticultural produce," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 75-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1992. "Public Perceptions of Food Saftey: Implications for Emerging Agricultural Technologies," Staff Paper Series 201159, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    2. Manchester, Alden C., 1992. "Rearranging The Economic Landscape: The Food Marketing Revolution, 1950-91," Agricultural Economic Reports 308263, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Tuan, Tran Huu & Navrud, Stale, 2009. "Applying the dissonance-minimising format to value cultural heritage in developing countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-17.
    4. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Linkages between Agricultural Marketing and Environmental Policies," Staff Paper Series 201168, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Maria Loureiro & Justus Lotade, 2005. "Interviewer Effects on the Valuation of Goods with Ethical and Environmental Attributes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 30(1), pages 49-72, January.
    6. Frazão, Elizabeth, 1994. "Consumer Concerns about Nutrition: Opportunities for the Food Sector," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309723, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. William J. Wheeler & Jeffrey K. Lazo & Matthew T. Heberling & Ann N. Fisher & Donald J. Epp, 1997. "Monetary Incentive Response Effects in Contingent Valuation Mail Surveys," Others 9703001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Laughland, Andrew & Musser, Wesley N. & Musser, Lynn M., "undated". "An Experiment On The Reliability Of Contingent Evaluation," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271069, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. T.A. Cameron & D.D. Huppert, 1988. ""Referendum" Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values," UCLA Economics Working Papers 519, UCLA Department of Economics.
    10. Loureiro, Maria L. & Hine, Susan, 2002. "Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, and GMO-Free Products," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 477-487, December.
    11. Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1990. "A Discussion Of Water Quality And Food Safety Issues," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(01), pages 1-6, July.
    12. Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1993. "Research Needs in the Valuation of Food Safety and Nutrition," Staff Paper Series 201172, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. Ukwueze Ezebuilo & Ogujiuba Kanayo & Adenuga Adeniyi, 2005. "How Useful Is Contingent Valuation Of The Environment To Water Services? Evidence From South East, Nigeria," Econometrics 0512012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Lindhjem, Henrik & Navrud, Ståle, 2008. "Internet CV surveys – a cheap, fast way to get large samples of biased values?," MPRA Paper 11471, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Brouwer, Roy & Martín-Ortega, Julia, 2012. "Modeling self-censoring of polluter pays protest votes in stated preference research to support resource damage estimations in environmental liability," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 151-166.
    16. Hyun No Kim & Ik-Chang Choi, 2018. "The Economic Impact of Government Policy on Market Prices of Low-Fat Pork in South Korea: A Quasi-Experimental Hedonic Price Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Bergstrom, John C. & Dillman, B.L. & Stoll, John R., 1985. "Public Environmental Amenity Benefits Of Private Land: The Case Of Prime Agricultural Land," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(01), pages 1-11, July.
    18. Atwood, Jay Dee & Hallam, Arne, "undated". "Farm Structure And Stewardship Of The Environment," 1990 Conference, January 6-9, Albuquerque, New Mexico 260176, Regional Research Committe NC-181: Determinants of Farm Size and Structure.
    19. Trudy Ann Cameron & W. Douglas Shaw & Shannon R. Ragland & Sally Keefe & John M. (Mac) Callaway, 1996. "Using Distance and Zip Code Census Information For Nonresponse Correction In the Analysis of Mail Survey Data," UCLA Economics Working Papers 751, UCLA Department of Economics.
    20. Capps, Oral, Jr., 1992. "The Food Distribution Industry: Untapped Clientele For Agricultural Economists," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-10, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudaeb:186194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.