IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating irrigation farm production functions using ABARES irrigation survey data


  • Hughes, Neal


The ABARE (now ABARES) survey of irrigation farms in the Murray–Darling Basin began in 2006–07 and provides a comprehensive farm-level panel dataset, which, to date, has seen limited econometric analysis (Ashton et al. 2009). At present, three complete years of irrigation survey data are available: 2006–07, 2007–08 and 2008–09. In each year, approximately 850 farms are sampled. As with the ABARES broadacre surveys, the irrigation survey is a rotating (unbalanced) panel dataset. This study makes use of the irrigation survey data to estimate production functions at both the farm and enterprise (crop/livestock activity) level. In addition to the traditional categories of input use (land, labour, capital and materials), the study incorporates measures of water use, tree and vine capital and local seasonal rainfall. The analysis incorporates fixed effects models to take advantage of the survey’s panel structure, as well as consideration of potentially endogenous inputs via instrumental variable methods. The study focuses on the short-run marginal revenue product of water implied by the estimated production functions. The results provide an encouraging demonstration of the kind of analysis that can be undertaken with the irrigation survey dataset. The estimated marginal product curves showed horticulture farms to have the steepest marginal product curve and broadacre farms to have the most elastic. There remain a number of promising areas for potential future research using the dataset, particularly if the survey were to continue for a longer and more representative sample of years.

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, Neal, 2011. "Estimating irrigation farm production functions using ABARES irrigation survey data," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 100564, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare11:100564

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Bjornlund, Henning & Shanahan, Martin & Zuo, Alec, 2008. "Price elasticity of water allocations demand in the Goulburn–Murray Irrigation District," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(1), March.
    2. Muhammad Ejaz Qureshi & Ram Ranjan & Sumaira Ejaz Qureshi, 2010. "An empirical assessment of the value of irrigation water: the case study of Murrumbidgee catchment ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(1), pages 99-118, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Zuo, Alec & Bjornlund, Henning, 2014. "Investigating the delayed on-farm consequences of selling water entitlements in the Murray-Darling Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 72-82.
    2. Kirby, Mac & Connor, Jeffery D. & Bark, Rosalind H. & Qureshi, Muhammad Ejaz & Keyworth, Scott W., 2012. "The economic impact of water reductions during the Millennium Drought in the Murray-Darling Basin," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Freemantle, Australia 124490, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Zuo, Alec & Nauges, Celine & Wheeler, Sarah, 2012. "Water trading as a risk-management tool for farmers: new empirical evidence from the Australian water market," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 149885, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    4. Lin Crase & Eve Merton, 2013. "Correcting Misconceptions about Links between Water Planning and Food Security in the Murray–Darling Basin," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 298-307, September.

    More about this item


    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare11:100564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.