IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404737.html

Wildfire and Severe Drought Effects on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Persistence

Author

Listed:
  • Gharib, Mariam
  • Bergtold, Jason
  • Avocat, Helene
  • Caldas, Marcellus M.
  • Joslin, Audrey

Abstract

CRP persistence, the length of time land under CRP land management practices remains under similar land management after contract expiration, ranges between 15 to 66% of previously enrolled land. Thus, longer-term environmental benefits from CRP on the land depend on how the land is managed after contract expiration. Research has examined what influences CRP persistence, but little literature extensively examines the effect of environmental factors on CRP persistence. We examine the influence of wildfires and drought, as well as surrounding land use, on CRP persistence. To study this, we constructed a 10-year unique geodatabase at the CRP parcel level and used a mixed effects Weibull accelerated failure time model (AFTM) to examine CRP persistence. We find that CRP persistence averages about 3 years, and most conversions of land practices away from those under prior CRP contracts happen within the first 2 years after contract expiration. CRP persistence is higher for expired CRP parcels located in regions with long-term to mid-range drought conditions, parcels that have been burnt or been in proximity to a megafire event. CRP persistence increases for every increase in percentage of grassland and open water for the surrounding land and decreases when bordered by crops. There is a need for policy intervention within the first two years after contract expiration to ensure the environmental benefits of conservation are retained in the longer term. This can be achieved through education to encourage landowners to retain CRP-based practices, enhancing wildfire mitigation land management efforts on both CRP and post-CRP lands, as well as increasing the likelihood of reenrollment for CRP lands classified as risky areas, such as those that are less connected or surrounded by crop production, located in wetlands, and during periods of short-term drought.

Suggested Citation

  • Gharib, Mariam & Bergtold, Jason & Avocat, Helene & Caldas, Marcellus M. & Joslin, Audrey, 2026. "Wildfire and Severe Drought Effects on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Persistence," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404737, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404737
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404737/files/177670_191783_115232_Gharib_et_al_CRP_persistence_AAEA_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hellerstein, Daniel & Malcolm, Scott, "undated". "The Influence of Rising Commodity Prices on the Conservation Reserve Program," Economic Research Report 262244, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Jacobson, Sarah, 2014. "Temporal spillovers in land conservation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 366-379.
    3. Wu, Feng & Guan, Zhengfei & Yu, Fan & Myers, Robert J., 2013. "The spillover effects of biofuel policy on participation in the conservation reserve program," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1755-1770.
    4. Hellerstein, Daniel & Vilorio, Dennis, 2019. "Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2019," Economic Information Bulletin 288293, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Chaudhary, Ashok Kumar & Kadam, Parag & Dwivedi, Puneet & Larson, Lincoln & Morse, Wayde & Garber, Ben & Iovanna, Rich, 2026. "Factors Affecting Enrollment in General Conservation Reserve Program: A Duration Analysis of Producers in Southern United States," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(1), pages 63-81, February.
    6. Ruben N. Lubowski & Andrew J. Plantinga & Robert N. Stavins, 2008. "What Drives Land-Use Change in the United States? A National Analysis of Landowner Decisions," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 529-550.
    7. Johnson, Kris A. & Dalzell, Brent J. & Donahue, Marie & Gourevitch, Jesse & Johnson, Dennis L. & Karlovits, Greg S. & Keeler, Bonnie & Smith, Jason T., 2016. "Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands provide ecosystem service benefits that exceed land rental payment costs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 175-185.
    8. Kiefer, Nicholas M, 1988. "Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 646-679, June.
    9. Hansen, LeRoy, 2007. "Conservation Reserve Program: Environmental Benefits Update," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 267-280, October.
    10. Michael J. Roberts & Ruben N. Lubowski, 2007. "Enduring Impacts of Land Retirement Policies: Evidence from the Conservation Reserve Program," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 83(4), pages 516-538.
    11. Julia Wahtra & Holger Johnsson, 2025. "The Sources of Slow Declines in Agricultural Nutrient Leakage: Evidence From Sweden," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(3), pages 611-624, July.
    12. Hendricks, Nathan P. & Er, Emrah, 2018. "Changes in cropland area in the United States and the role of CRP," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 15-23.
    13. Nicole Klein & Larry Janssen & Gary Taylor & Emmanuel Opuku & Michael Holbeck, 2008. "Conservation Reserve Program in South Dakota: Summary of Major Findings," Issue Briefs 2008500, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenberg, Andrew B. & Pratt, Bryan & Arnold, David, 2022. "Land Use Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: An Analysis of Rejected CRP Offers," 2023 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 6-8, 2023, New Orleans, Louisiana 316533, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Rosenberg, Andrew B. & Pratt, Bryan & Arnold, David, 2022. "Land Use Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: An Analysis of Rejected CRP Offers," 2022 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting (Virtual), January 7-9, 2022 316533, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Liao, Yanjun (Penny) & Wibbenmeyer, Matthew & Drunkenmiller, Hannah & Iovanna, Richard & Thompson, Alexandra & Holmes, Brandon, 2026. "Conservation and Community: The Local Economic Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program," RFF Reports 26-02, Resources for the Future.
    4. Andrew B. Rosenberg & Bryan Pratt, 2024. "Land use impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: An analysis of rejected offers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1217-1240, May.
    5. Mykel R. Taylor & Nathan P. Hendricks & Gabriel S. Sampson & Dillon Garr, 2021. "The Opportunity Cost of the Conservation Reserve Program: A Kansas Land Example," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 849-865, June.
    6. Rosenberg, Andrew B. & Pratt, Bryan & Arnold, David & Williams, Ryan, 2024. "Land Use of Rejected, Enrolled, and Expiring Fields in the Conservation Reserve Program," Economic Information Bulletin 344828, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Jones, Carol Adaire & Nickerson, Cynthia J. & Heisey, Paul W., 2012. "New Uses of Old Tools: An Assessment of Current and Potential Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation with Sector-based Policies," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124735, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Jacobson, Sarah, 2014. "Temporal spillovers in land conservation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 366-379.
    9. Chad Fiechter & Binayak Kunwar & Guy Tchuente, 2024. "Monetary Incentives, Landowner Preferences: Estimating Cross-Elasticities in Farmland Conversion to Renewable Energy," Papers 2411.10600, arXiv.org.
    10. Hendricks, Nathan P. & Er, Emrah, 2018. "Changes in cropland area in the United States and the role of CRP," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 15-23.
    11. Brian Cornish & Ruiqing Miao & Madhu Khanna, 2022. "Impact of changes in Title II of the 2018 Farm Bill on the acreage and environmental benefits of Conservation Reserve Program," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 1100-1122, June.
    12. Xie, Xianxiong & Cui, Yu & Yao, Liuyang & Ni, Qi & Khan, Sufyan Ullah & Zhao, Minjuan, 2022. "Does fallow policy affect rural household income in poor areas? A quasi-experimental evidence from fallow pilot area in Northwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    13. Jones, Carol & Nickerson, Cynthia J. & Sperow, Mark, 2013. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from the Conservation Reserve Program: The Contribution of Post-Contract Land Use Change," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150501, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Sims, Katharine R.E. & Schuetz, Jenny, 2009. "Local regulation and land-use change: The effects of wetlands bylaws in Massachusetts," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 409-421, July.
    15. Hannah Wing & Daniel P. Bigelow & Kate Binzen Fuller, 2024. "Does temporary land retirement promote organic adoption? Evidence from the Conservation Reserve Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(5), pages 1745-1774, October.
    16. Pratt, Bryan & Nagler, Amy M. & Rashford, Benjamin S. & Raff, Zach & Iovanna, Rich & Wallander, Steven, 2024. "Understanding the CRP Grasslands Signup," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343916, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Eugene Adjei & Jingfang Zhang & Wendiam Sawadgo & Wenying Li, 2024. "Nonlinear effects of conservation reserve program rental rates on land enrollment under varying crop price regimes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 1038-1064, September.
    18. Ruiqing Miao & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy & Xiaodong Du, 2014. "Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of the Conservation Reserve Program and its Interaction with Crop Insurance Subsidies," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 14-wp553, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Uludere Aragon, Nazli & Lark, Tyler J. & Naugle, Dave & Morford, Scott, 2025. "Enhancing Conservation Reserve Program Outcomes Through Durability-Informed Enrollment Targeting," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361149, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Winters-Michaud, Clayton P. & Haro, Alfredo & Callahan, Scott & Bigelow, Daniel P., 2024. "Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2017," Economic Information Bulletin 345316, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.