IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ajagec/v106y2024i5p1745-1774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does temporary land retirement promote organic adoption? Evidence from the Conservation Reserve Program

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Wing
  • Daniel P. Bigelow
  • Kate Binzen Fuller

Abstract

The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) allows agricultural producers to temporarily remove environmentally sensitive farmland from production in exchange for a yearly rental payment. While enrolled in the CRP, land typically complies with standards for organic certification, which prohibit the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers for three years prior to harvest. In this paper, we study the extent to which recent participation in the CRP promotes organic certification. We do so by estimating the relationship between exiting CRP contracts and new organic certifications at the county level over the years 2011–2020. Our primary results are based on an instrumental variables estimator, where we use the number of expiring CRP contracts as an instrument for endogenous net‐exiting CRP contracts. We find that the exit of land from the CRP leads to increases in organic adoption, and estimate a 0.029% increase in new organic operations in response to a 1% increase in net‐exiting CRP contracts. By highlighting this important co‐effect of the CRP, our analysis contributes to contemporary discussions exploring the long‐term linkages between land conservation policies, organic agriculture, and other conservation practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Wing & Daniel P. Bigelow & Kate Binzen Fuller, 2024. "Does temporary land retirement promote organic adoption? Evidence from the Conservation Reserve Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(5), pages 1745-1774, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1745-1774
    DOI: 10.1111/ajae.12465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12465
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajae.12465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:106:y:2024:i:5:p:1745-1774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8276 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.