IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361068.html

Estimating Producers’ Groundwater Pumping Costs in the San Joaquin Valley

Author

Listed:
  • Hurley, Sean P.

Abstract

This paper presents a stylized model for the interaction of a water agency regulating a producer’s usage of water. The model motivates the importance of regulators understanding the producer’s groundwater pumping costs when making policy decisions. A model is developed for estimating the groundwater pumping costs in the San Joaquin Valley of California. This model is based on data from California’s Well Completion Report database. The groundwater cost model assumes that wells use electric well pumps and that producers are charged based on a time-of-use fee schedule. To estimate groundwater pumping costs, 12 scenarios are investigated to simulate different types of crops. Based on these scenarios, Stanislaus County has the lowest average groundwater pumping costs at $71 per acre-foot for an operation that only pumps water at maximum capacity in the non-peak winter season. The highest groundwater pumping cost is associated with Kings County at $578 per acre-foot. This estimate is based on a producer only pumping water at maximum capacity during peak summer months. An estimate was made of the per kWh charge for water under the 12 different scenarios. The cheapest electricity rate occurred in Madera County with a cost of $0.2544 per kWh. This cost is associated with a well pump being operated at maximum capacity during daylight hours for a winter crop. The most expensive electricity was $0.8522 per kWh for Kern County for a summer crop where the water is pumped only during peak electricity pricing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hurley, Sean P., 2025. "Estimating Producers’ Groundwater Pumping Costs in the San Joaquin Valley," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361068, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361068
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361068/files/75293_94179_105300_AAEA2025GroundwaterEstimation_Article3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margriet F. Caswell & David Zilberman, 1986. "The Effects of Well Depth and Land Quality on the Choice of Irrigation Technology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 798-811.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chatterjee, Diti & Dinar, Ariel & González-Rivera, Gloria, 2019. "Impact of Agricultural Extension on Irrigated Agriculture Production and Water Use in California," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2019.
    2. Eric C. Edwards, 2016. "What Lies Beneath? Aquifer Heterogeneity and the Economics of Groundwater Management," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(2), pages 453-491.
    3. Lichtenberg, Erik & Majsztrik, John & Saavoss, Monica, "undated". "Willingness to Pay for Sensor-Controlled Irrigation," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 168211, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Eiji Satoh, 2011. "Nontransferable Water Rights and Technical Inefficiency in the Japanese Water Supply Industry," Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series gd11-211, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    5. Boyer, Christopher N. & Larson, James A. & Roberts, Roland K. & McClure, Angela T. & Tyler, Donald D., 2014. "The impact of field size and energy cost on the profitability of supplemental corn irrigation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-69.
    6. Alain Ayong Le Kama & Agnès Tomini, 2012. "Water Conservation versus Soil Salinity Control," Working Papers hal-04141151, HAL.
    7. Khanna, Madhu & Zilberman, David, 1997. "Incentives, precision technology and environmental protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 25-43, October.
    8. Fishman, Ram & Giné, Xavier & Jacoby, Hanan G., 2023. "Efficient irrigation and water conservation: Evidence from South India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    9. Reznik, Ami & Feinerman, Eli & Finkelshtain, Israel & Fisher, Franklin & Huber-Lee, Annette & Joyce, Brian & Kan, Iddo, 2017. "Economic implications of agricultural reuse of treated wastewater in Israel: A statewide long-term perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 222-233.
    10. David Zilberman & Alice Huang & Lanie Goldberg & Thomas Reardon, 2023. "The evolution of symbiotic innovation, water, and agricultural supply chains," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1592-1603, September.
    11. Pfeiffer, Lisa & Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2014. "Does efficient irrigation technology lead to reduced groundwater extraction? Empirical evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 189-208.
    12. Nian, Yefan & Huang, Qiuqiong & Kovacs, Kent, "undated". "The Use of Irrigation Practices by Arkansas Producers: The Impacts and Influencing Factors," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266639, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. Hellegers, Petra & Zilberman, David & van Ierland, Ekko, 2001. "Dynamics of agricultural groundwater extraction," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 303-311, May.
    14. Escribano, Maria Jesus & Calatrava-Leyva, Javier, 2005. "Analysis of the Adoption of Irrigation Technologies Under Uncertain Water Availability," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24672, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    16. Louis Sears & Joseph Caparelli & Clouse Lee & Devon Pan & Gillian Strandberg & Linh Vuu & C. -Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell, 2018. "Jevons’ Paradox and Efficient Irrigation Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Margarita Genius & Phoebe Koundouri & Celine Nauges & Vangelis TZOUVELEKAS, "undated". "Information Spillovers in Irrigation Technology Diffusion: Social Learning, Extension Visits and Spatial Effects," DEOS Working Papers 1319, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    18. Zhang, Biao & Fu, Zetian & Wang, Jieqiong & Zhang, Lingxian, 2019. "Farmers’ adoption of water-saving irrigation technology alleviates water scarcity in metropolis suburbs: A case study of Beijing, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 349-357.
    19. Nicolas E. Quintana Ashwell & Jeffrey M. Peterson, 2016. "The Impact of Irrigation Capital Subsidies on Common-Pool Groundwater Use and Depletion: Results for Western Kansas," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(03), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Schoengold, Karina & Zilberman, David, 2004. "Is Equity A Constraint? Applications To Block Rate And Other Pricing Schemes With Heterogeneous Users," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19945, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.