IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361010.html

Reducing Negative Effects of Risk Aversion on Farming Outcomes: Evidence for Systematic External Selection into Profitable Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Kopp, Thomas
  • Dsouza, Alwin
  • Mishra, Ashok K.

Abstract

Risk aversion among farmers in developing and emerging economies (DEE) often leads to underinvestment and lower profitability. H owever, c ontract f arming m ay mitigate these negative effects b y p roviding s tability a nd r esources. T his s tudy e xamines the selection of farmers into contract types, hypothesizing that production contract firms prefer risk-averse farmers due to their compliance and adherence to strict guidelines. Using survey data from 660 okra farmers in Karnataka, India, we apply an instrumental variable approach to address endogeneity. The results confirm that risk-averse farmers are disproportionately selected for production contracts, which offer s ignificantly higher profitability t han marketing c ontracts. Moreover, while r sk aversion generally reduces farm profitability, the benefits of production contracts outweigh this disadvantage. These findings suggest that contract farming can improve the economic outcomes of vulnerable farm households. From a policy perspective, facilitating access to production contracts may enhance farm resilience and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kopp, Thomas & Dsouza, Alwin & Mishra, Ashok K., 2025. "Reducing Negative Effects of Risk Aversion on Farming Outcomes: Evidence for Systematic External Selection into Profitable Contracts," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361010, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361010
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361010/files/75273_94308_105300_Kopp_et_al_-_2025_-_Reducing_Negative_Effects_of_Risk_Aversion.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanisch Markus & Rommel Jens & Müller Malte, 2013. "The Cooperative Yardstick Revisited: Panel Evidence from the European Dairy Sectors," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 151-162, December.
    2. You, Jing, 2014. "Risk, under-investment in agricultural assets and dynamic asset poverty in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 27-45.
    3. Yohannes Girma & Berhanu Kuma & Amsalu Bedemo, 2023. "Risk Aversion and Perception of Farmers about Endogenous Risks: An Empirical Study for Maize Producers in Awi Zone, Amhara Region of Ethiopia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    2. Jorge Luis Sánchez-Navarro & Narciso Arcas-Lario & Jos Bijman & Miguel Hernández-Espallardo, 2024. "The role of agricultural cooperatives in mitigating opportunism in the context of complying with sustainability requirements: empirical evidence from Spain," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Yuan, Yan & Xu, Lihe, 2015. "Are poor able to access the informal credit market? Evidence from rural households in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 232-246.
    4. Nilsson, Jerker & Helgesson, Matilda & Rommel, Jens & Svensson, Ellinor, 2020. "Forest-owner support for their cooperative's provision of public goods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Sagebiel, Julian & Müller, Jakob R. & Rommel, Jens, 2013. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Electricity from Cooperatives? Results from an Online Choice Experiment in Germany," MPRA Paper 52385, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Federica Di Marcantonio & Enkelejda Havari & Liesbeth Colen & Pavel Ciaian, 2022. "Do producer organizations improve trading practices and negotiation power for dairy farms? Evidence from selected EU countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(S1), pages 121-137, November.
    8. Yildiz, Özgür & Rommel, Jens & Debor, Sarah & Holstenkamp, Lars & Mey, Franziska & Müller, Jakob R. & Radtke, Jörg & Rognli, Judith, 2014. "Research Perspectives on Renewable Energy Cooperatives in Germany: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Lenses," MPRA Paper 55931, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Krisztina Melinda DOBAY, 2022. "The Resilience Of Agricultural Cooperatives In The Covid-19 Pandemic Time. Evidence From Romania," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 13-30.
    10. Jing You & Sangui Wang & Laurence Roope, 2018. "Intertemporal deprivation in rural china: income and nutrition," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(1), pages 61-101, March.
    11. Lijuan Xu & Abbas Ali Chandio & Jingyi Wang & Yuansheng Jiang, 2022. "Does Farmland Tenancy Improve Household Asset Allocation? Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Malvido Perez Carletti Agustina & Hanisch Markus & Rommel Jens & Fulton Murray, 2018. "Farm Gate Prices for Non-Varietal Wine in Argentina: A Multilevel Comparison of the Prices Paid by Cooperatives and Investor-Oriented Firms," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Jasper GRASHUIS & Ye SU, 2019. "A Review Of The Empirical Literature On Farmer Cooperatives: Performance, Ownership And Governance, Finance, And Member Attitude," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(1), pages 77-102, March.
    14. Hanjie Wang & Xiaolong Tian & Jiali Han, 2026. "Blessing or Curse? The Welfare Consequences of Cash Gift Expenditure for the Poor," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    16. Judit Nagy & Zsófia Jámbor, . "Competitiveness in Dairy Trade – the Case of EU and the Visegrad Group Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 11(4).
    17. Yongmin Luo & Shenqi Ding & Qiyuan Li & Min Gao, 2024. "Adding insult to injury: Living in a remote location increases the burden of gift expenses among the rural poor in China," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 2229-2251, July.
    18. Höfer, Hanna-Helena & Rommel, Jens, 2015. "Internal governance and member investment behavior in energy cooperatives: An experimental approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 52-56.
    19. Theo Benos & Nikos Kalogeras & Martin Wetzels & Ko De Ruyter & Joost M. E. Pennings, 2018. "Harnessing a ‘Currency Matrix’ for Performance Measurement in Cooperatives: A Multi-Phased Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-38, December.
    20. Jos BIJMAN & Markus HANISCH, 2020. "Understanding the heterogeneity among agricultural cooperatives," CIRIEC Working Papers 2013, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.