IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361010.html

Reducing Negative Effects of Risk Aversion on Farming Outcomes: Evidence for Systematic External Selection into Profitable Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Kopp, Thomas
  • Dsouza, Alwin
  • Mishra, Ashok K.

Abstract

Risk aversion among farmers in developing and emerging economies (DEE) often leads to underinvestment and lower profitability. H owever, c ontract f arming m ay mitigate these negative effects b y p roviding s tability a nd r esources. T his s tudy e xamines the selection of farmers into contract types, hypothesizing that production contract firms prefer risk-averse farmers due to their compliance and adherence to strict guidelines. Using survey data from 660 okra farmers in Karnataka, India, we apply an instrumental variable approach to address endogeneity. The results confirm that risk-averse farmers are disproportionately selected for production contracts, which offer s ignificantly higher profitability t han marketing c ontracts. Moreover, while r sk aversion generally reduces farm profitability, the benefits of production contracts outweigh this disadvantage. These findings suggest that contract farming can improve the economic outcomes of vulnerable farm households. From a policy perspective, facilitating access to production contracts may enhance farm resilience and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kopp, Thomas & Dsouza, Alwin & Mishra, Ashok K., 2025. "Reducing Negative Effects of Risk Aversion on Farming Outcomes: Evidence for Systematic External Selection into Profitable Contracts," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361010, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361010
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361010/files/75273_94308_105300_Kopp_et_al_-_2025_-_Reducing_Negative_Effects_of_Risk_Aversion.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. You, Jing, 2014. "Risk, under-investment in agricultural assets and dynamic asset poverty in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 27-45.
    2. Hanisch Markus & Rommel Jens & Müller Malte, 2013. "The Cooperative Yardstick Revisited: Panel Evidence from the European Dairy Sectors," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 151-162, December.
    3. Yohannes Girma & Berhanu Kuma & Amsalu Bedemo, 2023. "Risk Aversion and Perception of Farmers about Endogenous Risks: An Empirical Study for Maize Producers in Awi Zone, Amhara Region of Ethiopia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    2. Jorge Luis Sánchez-Navarro & Narciso Arcas-Lario & Jos Bijman & Miguel Hernández-Espallardo, 2024. "The role of agricultural cooperatives in mitigating opportunism in the context of complying with sustainability requirements: empirical evidence from Spain," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Yuan, Yan & Xu, Lihe, 2015. "Are poor able to access the informal credit market? Evidence from rural households in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 232-246.
    4. Junying Lin & Zhonggen Zhang & Ziming Liu & Jens Rommel, 2020. "The impact of cooperatives’ transportation services on farm income: Evidence from tobacco farmers in Guizhou, China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 146-158, January.
    5. Nilsson, Jerker & Helgesson, Matilda & Rommel, Jens & Svensson, Ellinor, 2020. "Forest-owner support for their cooperative's provision of public goods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Luo, Jay, 2019. "Poverty alleviation research in rural China: Three decades and counting," SocArXiv gmuav, Center for Open Science.
    8. Mao, Hui & Fu, Yong, 2024. "Risk preference and relative poverty: An analysis based on the data of China Family Panel Studies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 220-232.
    9. Hang, Yuan, "undated". "Is There a Poverty Trap of multiple Dynamic Equilibria? The Analysis on Data of Rural Fixed Observation Point from 2004 to 2012," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 257264, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Sagebiel, Julian & Müller, Jakob R. & Rommel, Jens, 2013. "Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Electricity from Cooperatives? Results from an Online Choice Experiment in Germany," MPRA Paper 52385, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Federica Di Marcantonio & Enkelejda Havari & Liesbeth Colen & Pavel Ciaian, 2022. "Do producer organizations improve trading practices and negotiation power for dairy farms? Evidence from selected EU countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(S1), pages 121-137, November.
    12. Viergutz, Tim & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, "undated". "Member Commitment and Switching Decisions in Dairy Cooperatives – A Factorial Survey," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276864, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    13. Linjing Ren & Xiaojun Yang, 2023. "Adoption and shift of water-saving strategies to policy shock: based on social-ecological system analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(10), pages 4015-4037, August.
    14. Yildiz, Özgür & Rommel, Jens & Debor, Sarah & Holstenkamp, Lars & Mey, Franziska & Müller, Jakob R. & Radtke, Jörg & Rognli, Judith, 2014. "Research Perspectives on Renewable Energy Cooperatives in Germany: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Lenses," MPRA Paper 55931, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Krisztina Melinda DOBAY, 2022. "The Resilience Of Agricultural Cooperatives In The Covid-19 Pandemic Time. Evidence From Romania," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 13-30.
    16. Maximilian Koppenberg & Stefan Hirsch, 2022. "Output market power and firm characteristics in dairy processing: Evidence from three EU countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 490-517, June.
    17. Yung-Chang WANG, 2017. "A conjectural variation approach to vertical integration in agricultural cooperatives," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 228-233.
    18. Jing You & Sangui Wang & Laurence Roope, 2018. "Intertemporal deprivation in rural china: income and nutrition," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(1), pages 61-101, March.
    19. Lijuan Xu & Abbas Ali Chandio & Jingyi Wang & Yuansheng Jiang, 2022. "Does Farmland Tenancy Improve Household Asset Allocation? Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Qiao Liang & Xinxin Wang, 2020. "Cooperatives as competitive yardstick in the hog industry?—Evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(1), pages 127-145, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.