IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea23/335778.html

A Choice Experiment of Wyoming Residents’ Preferences Toward Water Resilience Improvement Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Van Sandt, Anders T.
  • Hansen, Kristiana M.
  • Ehmke, Mariah D.
  • Shinker, JJ
  • Paige, Ginger
  • Keller, Mary
  • Cooper, Kaatie
  • Landreville, Kristen Dawn

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Sandt, Anders T. & Hansen, Kristiana M. & Ehmke, Mariah D. & Shinker, JJ & Paige, Ginger & Keller, Mary & Cooper, Kaatie & Landreville, Kristen Dawn, 2023. "A Choice Experiment of Wyoming Residents’ Preferences Toward Water Resilience Improvement Programs," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335778, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea23:335778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335778/files/26691.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junyi Shen, 2009. "Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(22), pages 2915-2924.
    2. Bryan Shuman, 2012. "Recent Wyoming temperature trends, their drivers, and impacts in a 14,000-year context," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 429-447, May.
    3. Daniele Pacifico & Hong il Yoo, 2013. "lclogit: A Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 13(3), pages 625-639, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:aaea22:335778 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Phong, Truong Ngoc & Thang, Vo Tat & Hoai, Nguyen Trong, 2021. "What motivates farmers to accept good aquaculture practices in development policy? Results from choice experiment surveys with small-scale shrimp farmers in Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 454-469.
    3. Barbara Cavalletti & Fedra Gianoglio & Maria Rocca & Pietro Marescotti, 2025. "Economic Valuation of Geosystem Services in Agricultural Products: A Small-Sample Pilot Study on Rotella Apple and Moscatello Wine," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Eleonora Sofia Rossi & Luca Cacchiarelli & Simone Severini & Alessandro Sorrentino, 2024. "Consumers preferences and social sustainability: a discrete choice experiment on ‘Quality Agricultural Work’ ethical label in the Italian fruit sector," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Van Sandt, Anders T. & Costanigro, Marco & Thilmany McFadden, Dawn D., "undated". "The Impact of Consumer Heterogeneity and Surrounding Amenities in Determining Traveler Behavior: A Choice Experiment on Agritourism," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259118, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Brown, Sarah & Greene, William H. & Harris, Mark N. & Taylor, Karl, 2015. "An inverse hyperbolic sine heteroskedastic latent class panel tobit model: An application to modelling charitable donations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 228-236.
    7. Stone, Janine & Costanigro, Marco & Goemans, Christopher, 2018. "Public Opinion on ColoradoWater Rights Transfers: Are Policy Preferences Consistent with Concerns over Impacts?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(3), September.
    8. Stephane Hess, 2014. "Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 14, pages 311-330, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Li, Binbin & Yao, Enjian & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Tang, Ying & Liu, Shasha, 2020. "Exploring behavioral heterogeneities of metro passenger’s travel plan choice under unplanned service disruption with uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 294-306.
    10. Vierth , Inge & Lindgren, Samuel & de Jong, Gerard & Baak , Jaap & Hovi , Inger Beate & Berglund , Moa & Edwards, Henrik, 2017. "Recommendation for a new commodity classification for the national freight model Samgods," Working papers in Transport Economics 2017:11, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    11. Douadia Bougherara & Lana Friesen & Céline Nauges, 2021. "Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 89-112, February.
    12. Roger Claassen & Christian Langpap & JunJie Wu, 2017. "Impacts of Federal Crop Insurance on Land Use and Environmental Quality," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 592-613.
    13. Gunnar Gutsche & Andreas Ziegler, 2016. "Are private investors willing to pay for sustainable investments? A stated choice experiment," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201640, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    14. André Rossi Oliveira & Rossitza B. Wooster & Michael Paruszkiewicz, 2021. "The impact of earnings gaps and networks on migration decisions: an empirical study of undocumented Mexican migrants," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 993-1012, February.
    15. Julia B. Block & Michael Danne & Oliver Mußhoff, 2026. "Who Are the Farmers Participating in a Carbon Sequestration Program? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 590-602, April.
    16. Xuemei Fu, 2021. "How habit moderates the commute mode decision process: integration of the theory of planned behavior and latent class choice model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2681-2707, October.
    17. Rommel, Kai & Vastag, Alex, 2018. "Nachhaltige Mobilität – Transformation von Konsumentenpräferenzen in Geschäftsmodelle für Elektromobilität," ISM Research Journal, International School of Management (ISM), Dortmund, vol. 5(1), pages 27-53.
    18. Nael Alsaleh & Bilal Farooq & Yixue Zhang & Steven Farber, 2021. "On-Demand Transit User Preference Analysis using Hybrid Choice Models," Papers 2102.08256, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    19. Sanjana Hossain & Md. Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "A latent class joint mode and departure time choice model for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1217-1239, June.
    20. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.
    21. Meyerding, Stephan G.H. & Bauchrowitz, Alexander & Lehberger, Mira, 2019. "Consumer preferences for beer attributes in Germany: A conjoint and latent class approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 229-240.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea23:335778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.