IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/364838.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancing smallholder sweet potato production and reducing susceptibility to inefficiencies in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Matli, Mankaba M.W
  • Senyolo, Mmapatla P.
  • Nhundu, Kenneth
  • Belete, Abenet

Abstract

Smallholder farmers often face challenges in adopting improved technologies to increase their crop outputs. To address this issue, it has been acknowledged that increasing resource use efficiency can be a significant factor in enhancing farmers' resilience to inefficiencies and increasing outputs. Resilience to inefficiencies is crucial for increasing output, as quantity is a vital prerequisite when taking produce to market. It has also been argued that investing in the economic research of minor crops, such as sweet potatoes, can offer lucrative opportunities for poverty alleviation and employment creation in rural and poor communities. This paper analyses the resilience of smallholder sweet potato farmers to inefficiencies using the Data Envelopment Analysis and drivers (using the Tobit Regression Model) of resilience to inefficiencies in STATA. The study was warranted to see areas that need improvement to achieve a sweet potato production system that is resilient to inefficiencies. As part of the assessment, Gauteng, North West and Limpopo Provinces were purposively selected and a total of 119 sweet potato farmers were selected using a snowball sampling technique. Face – to – face interviews were used to collect the quantitative and qualitative data from the respondents. Results indicated that smallholder sweet potato farmers in South Africa are generally not resilient to inefficiencies and this is influenced by the quantity of their outputs, land sizes, access to credit, employment statuses and use of chemicals.

Suggested Citation

  • Matli, Mankaba M.W & Senyolo, Mmapatla P. & Nhundu, Kenneth & Belete, Abenet, 2023. "Enhancing smallholder sweet potato production and reducing susceptibility to inefficiencies in South Africa," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364838, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364838
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364838/files/339.%20Sweet%20potatoes%20in%20South%20Arrica.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Munir Ahmad & Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 1995. "An Econometric Decomposition of Dairy Output Growth," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(4), pages 914-921.
    2. Abdulai, Awudu & Huffman, Wallace, 2000. "Structural Adjustment and Economic Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(3), pages 503-520, April.
    3. Alwang, Jeffrey & Gotor, Elisabetta & Thiele, Graham & Hareau, Guy & Jaleta, Moti & Chamberlin, Jordan, 2019. "Pathways from research on improved staple crop germplasm to poverty reduction for smallholder farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 16-27.
    4. Nouman Afzal & Stavros Afionis & Lindsay C. Stringer & Nicola Favretto & Marco Sakai & Paola Sakai, 2021. "Benefits and Trade-Offs of Smallholder Sweet Potato Cultivation as a Pathway toward Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Anbes Tenaye, 2020. "Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Agriculture in Developing Countries: The Case of Ethiopia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Poulton, Colin & Dorward, Andrew & Kydd, Jonathan, 2010. "The Future of Small Farms: New Directions for Services, Institutions, and Intermediation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1413-1428, October.
    7. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Watkins, K. Bradley & Hristovska, Tatjana & Mazzanti, Ralph & Wilson, Charles E., Jr., 2013. "Measuring Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiency of Rice Production in Arkansas using Data Envelopment Analysis," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 142962, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Zhong, Shen & Li, Junwei & Qu, Yi, 2022. "Green total factor productivity of dairy cow in China: Key facts from scale and regional sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Hayatullah Ahmadzai, 2022. "Hope for Change: Is Diversifying Production Portfolios an Ideal Strategy to Boost Farming Efficiency in Afghanistan?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 22(1), pages 7-31, January.
    4. Madau, Fabio A., 2012. "Technical and scale efficiency in the Italian Citrus Farming: A comparison between Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) Models," MPRA Paper 41403, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Nguyen To-The & Tuan Nguyen-Anh, 2021. "Impact of government intervention to maize efficiency at farmer’s level across time: a robust evidence in Northern Vietnam," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2038-2061, February.
    6. Krzysztof Piotr Pawłowski & Wawrzyniec Czubak & Jagoda Zmyślona, 2021. "Regional Diversity of Technical Efficiency in Agriculture as a Results of an Overinvestment: A Case Study from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Jorge Antunes & Rangan Gupta & Zinnia Mukherjee & Peter Wanke, 2022. "Information entropy, continuous improvement, and US energy performance: a novel stochastic-entropic analysis for ideal solutions (SEA-IS)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 289-318, June.
    8. Shawna Grosskopf & Kathy Hayes & Lori Taylor & William L Weber, 2017. "Would weighted-student funding enhance intra-district equity in Texas? A simulation using DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(4), pages 377-389, April.
    9. Kerstin Pull & Birgit Pferdmenges & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2017. "Do Research Training Groups Operate at Optimal Size?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(2), pages 129-145, May.
    10. Ravi Kumar Jain & Ramachandran Natarajan & Amlan Ghosh, 2016. "Decision Tree Analysis for Selection of Factors in DEA: An Application to Banks in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1162-1178, October.
    11. Ghiyasi, Mojtaba & Cook, Wade D., 2021. "Modelling the semi-additive production technology in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Kai Li & Zhili Ma & Guozhou Zhang, 2019. "Evaluation of the Supply-Side Efficiency of China’s Real Estate Market: A Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Arzum Buyukkeklik & Harun Dumlu & Samet Evci, 2016. "Measuring the Efficiency of Turkish SMEs: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 190-190, June.
    14. Feifei Ye & Rongyan You & Haitian Lu & Sirui Han & Long-Hao Yang, 2023. "The Classification Impact of Different Types of Environmental Regulation on Chinese Provincial Carbon Emission Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    15. Mohammad Reza TAVAKOLI BAGHDADABAD & Afsaneh NOORI HOUSHYAR, 2014. "Productivity and Efficiency Evaluation of US Mutual Funds," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 64(2), pages 120-143, March.
    16. Paolo Mazzocchi & Claudio Quintano & Antonella Rocca, 2024. "Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5621-5654, December.
    17. Entezam, Hasan Farmani & Sobhani, Farzad Movahedi & Najafi, Seyed Esmaeil & Roshdi, Israfil, 2020. "A multi-component enhanced Russell measure of efficiency: With application to water supply plans," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Keshvari, Abolfazl & Kuosmanen, Timo, 2013. "Stochastic non-convex envelopment of data: Applying isotonic regression to frontier estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 481-491.
    19. Keenan, Michael & Fort, Ricardo & Vargas, Ricardo, 2024. "Shocked into side-selling? Production shocks and organic coffee farmers’ marketing decisions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Ajayi, Victor & Anaya, Karim & Pollitt, Michael, 2022. "Incentive regulation, productivity growth and environmental effects: the case of electricity networks in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.