IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pec9.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Daniel Eckert

Personal Details

First Name:Daniel
Middle Name:
Last Name:Eckert
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pec9

Affiliation

Institut für Finanzwissenschaft und Öffentliche Wirtschaft
Social- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz

Graz, Austria
http://www.kfunigraz.ac.at/fwiwww/
RePEc:edi:fgrazat (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2017. "Impossibility results for infinite-electorate abstract aggregation rules," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 427, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  2. Daniel Eckert & Frederik Herzberg, 2016. "The birth of social choice theory from the spirit of mathematical logic: Arrow's theorem in the framework of model theory," Graz Economics Papers 2016-04, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
  3. Eckert, Daniel & Herzberg, Frederik, 2011. "It all depends on independence," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 412, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  4. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Guilbaud's 1952 theorem on the logical problem of aggregation," Post-Print hal-00642163, HAL.
  5. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2010. "General aggregation problems and social structure: A model-theoretic generalisation of the Kirman-Sondermann correspondence," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 424, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
  6. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem : An early contribution to judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00404185, HAL.

Articles

  1. Daniel Eckert & Christian Klamler, 2014. "A note on evaluating freedom of opinion," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(3), pages 1805-1813.
  2. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2012. "The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: Impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-47.
  3. Eckert, Daniel & Klamler, Christian, 2010. "An equity-efficiency trade-off in a geometric approach to committee selection," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 386-391, September.
  4. Christian Klamler & Daniel Eckert, 2009. "A simple ultrafilter proof for an impossibility theorem in judgment aggregation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(1), pages 319-327.
  5. Christian Klamler & Daniel Eckert, 2008. "Antipodality in committee selection," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5.
  6. Daniel Eckert & Christian Klamler & Johann Mitlöhner & Christian Schlötterer, 2006. "A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(4), pages 377-386, December.
  7. Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Proximity Preservation in an Anonymous Framework," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(6), pages 1-6.
  8. Nick Baigent & Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Abstract Aggregations and Proximity Preservation: An Impossibility Result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 359-366, June.
  9. Daniel Eckert & Benjamin Lane, 2002. "Anonymity, ordinal preference proximity and imposed social choices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(3), pages 681-684.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2017. "Impossibility results for infinite-electorate abstract aggregation rules," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 427, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    2. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    3. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.
    4. Herzberg, Frederik, 2014. "Aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean preferences: Arrovian impossibility results," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 488, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Herzberg, Frederik, 2013. "Arrovian aggregation of MBA preferences: An impossibility result," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79957, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Herzberg, Frederik, 2014. "Aggregating infinitely many probability measures," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 499, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  2. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem : An early contribution to judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00404185, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    2. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    3. Herzberg, Frederik S., 2008. "Judgement aggregation functions and ultraproducts," MPRA Paper 10546, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2008.

Articles

  1. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2012. "The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: Impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-47.

    Cited by:

    1. Schoch, Daniel, 2015. "Game Form Representation for Judgement and Arrovian Aggregation," MPRA Paper 64311, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2020. "Arrow’s decisive coalitions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 463-505, March.
    3. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.
    4. Herzberg, Frederik, 2014. "Aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean preferences: Arrovian impossibility results," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 488, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Herzberg, Frederik, 2013. "Arrovian aggregation of MBA preferences: An impossibility result," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79957, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Herzberg, Frederik, 2014. "Aggregating infinitely many probability measures," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 499, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  2. Eckert, Daniel & Klamler, Christian, 2010. "An equity-efficiency trade-off in a geometric approach to committee selection," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 386-391, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Jiehua Chen & Martin Nollenburg & Sofia Simola & Anais Villedieu & Markus Wallinger, 2022. "Multidimensional Manhattan Preferences," Papers 2201.09691, arXiv.org.

  3. Christian Klamler & Daniel Eckert, 2009. "A simple ultrafilter proof for an impossibility theorem in judgment aggregation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(1), pages 319-327.

    Cited by:

    1. Herzberg, Frederik, 2010. "Judgment aggregators and Boolean algebra homomorphisms," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 414, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    2. Herzberg, Frederik S., 2008. "Judgement aggregation functions and ultraproducts," MPRA Paper 10546, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2008.
    3. Herzberg, Frederik, 2014. "Aggregating infinitely many probability measures," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 499, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.

  4. Christian Klamler & Daniel Eckert, 2008. "Antipodality in committee selection," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5.

    Cited by:

    1. Eckert, Daniel & Klamler, Christian, 2010. "An equity-efficiency trade-off in a geometric approach to committee selection," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 386-391, September.

  5. Daniel Eckert & Christian Klamler & Johann Mitlöhner & Christian Schlötterer, 2006. "A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(4), pages 377-386, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander V. Karpov, 2018. "An Informational Basis for Voting Rules," HSE Working papers WP BRP 188/EC/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Janusz Łyko & Radosław Rudek, 2017. "Operations research methods in political decisions: a case study on the European Parliament composition," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 572-586, December.
    3. I. Contreras, 2012. "Ordered Weighted Disagreement Functions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 345-361, May.
    4. Ignacio Contreras, 2010. "A Distance-Based Consensus Model with Flexible Choice of Rank-Position Weights," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 441-456, September.
    5. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Marc Vorsatz, 2013. "Measuring the cohesiveness of preferences: an axiomatic analysis," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(4), pages 965-988, October.

  6. Nick Baigent & Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Abstract Aggregations and Proximity Preservation: An Impossibility Result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 359-366, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Proximity Preservation in an Anonymous Framework," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(6), pages 1-6.

  7. Daniel Eckert & Benjamin Lane, 2002. "Anonymity, ordinal preference proximity and imposed social choices," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(3), pages 681-684.

    Cited by:

    1. Nick Baigent & Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Abstract Aggregations and Proximity Preservation: An Impossibility Result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 359-366, June.
    2. Woo, Wai Chiu, 2018. "Kaplow–Shavell welfarism without continuity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 92-96.
    3. Daniel Eckert, 2004. "Proximity Preservation in an Anonymous Framework," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(6), pages 1-6.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 6 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (5) 2009-02-07 2009-07-17 2009-12-19 2010-04-17 2010-07-31. Author is listed
  2. NEP-HIS: Business, Economic & Financial History (3) 2009-07-17 2010-07-31 2016-03-29
  3. NEP-HPE: History & Philosophy of Economics (3) 2009-07-17 2009-12-19 2010-07-31
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2009-12-19

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Daniel Eckert should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.