IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/67990.html

Volkswirtschaftliche Aspekte der Klimaanpassung in der Landwirtschaft. Eine konzeptionelle Fallstudie zur Bewässerung in Österreich

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Sinabell
  • Gerhard Streicher
  • Hans-Peter Haslmayr

    (Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety)

Abstract

Die Anpassung an den Klimawandel ist eine große Herausforderung, der sich vor allem jene Sektoren stellen müssen, deren Produktionsgrundlage die freie Natur ist. Neben der Freizeitwirtschaft zählt die Landwirtschaft dazu. Vor allem im Osten Österreichs ist der zunehmende Wassermangel eine Bedrohung für die landwirtschaftliche Produktion. Die Bewässerung landwirtschaftlicher Flächen ist eine Möglichkeit zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel. Ihre Rolle und Bedeutung werden im Bericht vorgestellt. Steht diese Option nicht zur Verfügung, ist mit Ertragsausfällen in der Landwirtschaft zu rechnen. Davon sind auch Unternehmen betroffen, die vor Ort produzierte Agrargüter nicht mehr weiterverarbeiten können, wenn es zu Ertragsausfällen kommt. Auf der Grundlage von Szenarien des Projekts BEAT zu Produktionsänderungen in der Landwirtschaft werden die ökonomischen Auswirkungen quantifiziert. Die darauf aufbauende volkswirtschaftliche Analyse bewertet die Konsequenzen im Hinblick auf Beschäftigung und Wertschöpfung. In allen untersuchten Szenarien ist mit einem Produktionsrückgang in der Landwirtschaft zu rechnen. Aufgrund der verringerten Nachfrage nach Vorleistungen und verringerter Verarbeitung von Agrarprodukten, nehmen Wertschöpfung und Beschäftigung in der Volkswirtschaft ab.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Sinabell & Gerhard Streicher & Hans-Peter Haslmayr, 2021. "Volkswirtschaftliche Aspekte der Klimaanpassung in der Landwirtschaft. Eine konzeptionelle Fallstudie zur Bewässerung in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67990.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:67990
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/67990
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giles Atkinson & Susana Mourato, 2015. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment," OECD Environment Working Papers 97, OECD Publishing.
    2. David Hensher & Nina Shore & Kenneth Train, 2006. "Water Supply Security and Willingness to Pay to Avoid Drought Restrictions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(256), pages 56-66, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon Tarfasa & Roy Brouwer, 2013. "Estimation of the public benefits of urban water supply improvements in Ethiopia: a choice experiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(9), pages 1099-1108, March.
    2. Debora Lithgow & Juan José Von Thaden & Daniel A. Revollo-Fernández & María del Pilar Salazar-Vargas & Aram Rodríguez de los Santos, 2024. "Assessing the Feasibility and Socioecological Benefits of Climate-Smart Practices at the Watershed Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. John Freebairn, 2013. "Imperfect Knowledge and Urban Water Decisions," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 32-40, March.
    4. Francisco González Gómez & Jorge Guardiola & Edna Guidi Gutiérrez, 2012. "Willingness to pay more for water in a climate of confrontation: The case of Sucre, Bolivia," Working Papers. Serie EC 2012-03, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    5. Roy Brouwer & Fumbi Job & Bianca Kroon & Richard Johnston, 2015. "Comparing Willingness to Pay for Improved Drinking-Water Quality Using Stated Preference Methods in Rural and Urban Kenya," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 81-94, February.
    6. Blackman, Allen & Qin, Ping & Yang, Jun, 2020. "How costly are driving restrictions? Contingent valuation evidence from Beijing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. repec:bla:ausecr:v:41:y:2008:i:4:p:401-412 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Bethany Cooper & Michael Burton & Lin Crase, 2019. "Willingness to Pay to Avoid Water Restrictions in Australia Under a Changing Climate," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(3), pages 823-847, March.
    9. Zhang, Fan & Fogarty, James, "undated". "Nonmarket Valuation of Water Sensitive Cities: Current Knowledge and Issues," Working Papers 207694, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Paul Mwebaze & Jeff Bennett & Nigel W. Beebe & Gregor J. Devine & Paul Barro, 2018. "Economic Valuation of the Threat Posed by the Establishment of the Asian Tiger Mosquito in Australia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(2), pages 357-379, October.
    11. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Matteo Mazzarano & Andrea Pronti & Marco Quatrosi, 2020. "Fiscal policies, public investments and wellbeing: mapping the evolution of the EU," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(4), pages 725-749, December.
    12. Sergey Fomenko & Sanat Tolendiuly & Ahmet Turan & Adil Akishev, 2022. "Production of Refractory Bricks through Combustion Synthesis from Metallurgical Wastes and the Thermo-Physical Properties of the Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Groothuis, Peter A. & Cockerill, Kristan & Mohr, Tanga McDaniel, 2015. "Water does not flow up hill: determinants of willingness to pay for water conservation measures in the mountains of western North Carolina," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 88-95.
    14. Lin Crase & Suzanne O’Keefe & Brian Dollery, 2008. "Can Urban Water Markets Work? Some Concerns," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 15(3), pages 73-82.
    15. Castledine, A. & Moeltner, K. & Price, M.K. & Stoddard, S., 2014. "Free to choose: Promoting conservation by relaxing outdoor watering restrictions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PA), pages 324-343.
    16. Pratt, Bryan, 2023. "A fine is more than a price: Evidence from drought restrictions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Ivo Horák & Petr Marada, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of the Selected Ecologically Significant Element in Agriculture," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 70(4-5), pages 295-306.
    18. Hughes, Neal & Hafi, Ahmed & Goesch, Tim & Brownlowe, Nathan, 2008. "Urban water management: optimal price and investment policy under uncertainty," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6005, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. Nakamura, A., 2011. "Estimating switching costs after introducing Fixed-Mobile Convergence in Japan," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 59-71, March.
    20. Jia Wang & Jiaoju Ge & Zhifeng Gao, 2018. "Consumers’ Preferences and Derived Willingness-to-Pay for Water Supply Safety Improvement: The Analysis of Pricing and Incentive Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    21. Emma Aisbett & Ralf Steinhauser, 2011. "Maintaining the Common Pool: Voluntary Water Conservation in Response to Increasing Scarcity," Crawford School Research Papers 1111, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:67990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.