PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE BALKANS - from Weberian bureaucracy to New Public Management
- Lucica Matei()Spyridon Flogaitis(South-Eastern European Administrative Studies - ASsee Online Series)Registered editor(s):
The current volume reproduces papers presented in the Workshop which was organized in Athens, in February 2010 by the European Public Law Organization (EPLO) and the Faculty of Public Administration â€“ National School of Political Studies and Public Administration (NSPSPA), Bucharest. The workshop entitled â€œPublic Administration in the Balkans â€“ from Weberian bureaucracy to New Public Managementâ€ has aimed to reveal relevant aspects on the developments of national public administrations in some Balkan states related to the traditional or actual models of the administrative organization. The organizers have proposed to approach theoretical and practical aspects focusing on Weberian bureaucracy and New Public Management (NPM). In this context, the general framework of debates was based both on specificity of public administration in the Balkan states and the European integration process, particularly the enlargement of the European Administrative Space to the Balkan area. As shown by a profound analysis in the papers, the characteristics of the public administrations are moreover diverse and get closer to the developments of the public administrations in Europe, such as the Mediterranean ones (Greece, Cyprus etc.) or those of the states in transition (Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Serbia etc.). The interactions with different intensities between Weberianism and New Public Management emphasise, generally, the characteristics of â€œa new Weberian stateâ€ (NWS) for the Balkan states (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 2004, Meneguzzo et al, 2010), revealing a higher NPM impact (Cyprus, Greece, Croatia etc.) or a lower one (Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia etc.). NWS represents a metaphor describing a model that co-opts the passive elements of NPM, but on a Weberian foundation (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 2004, Brown, 1978). The fact that the Balkan states belong more or less explicit to NWS triggers their position in post-NPM era, thus the state remaining an important actor, able to facilitate the public-private dialogue and to sustain the processes for enhancing the effectiveness of public services and administration. The public administration reforms in the Balkan states have targeted one or several European models of national administrations. Even if the concepts on reform comprise visible differences, the tradition, geo-political specificity, human and material resources have determined similarities and common characteristics, which could be emphasized in the development and actual status of administration in the Balkan states. At the same time, the administrative reforms have already introduced elements that enable the administrations in the Balkan states to get closer to the features of â€œpublic governanceâ€ . Herewith we refer mainly to participating in decision-making, introducing the elements of â€œneo-corporatismâ€ governance etc. The capacity of adaptation and openness represent a valuable feature of the Balkan administrations, most of them holding systemic connections of low intensity, thus being far away from what we call â€œstrong administrationâ€ , found especially in the European developed states. Recent studies support the above ideas, referring to â€œmain drivers of public administration modernizationâ€ , placing most Balkan states in the â€œvery lowâ€ or â€œmediumâ€ area (Demmke et al., 2006). When referring to open government or ethics, the same studies place the Balkan states under the heading â€œvery high influenceâ€ . Based on the above assertions, the papers emphasize concrete issues that could be synthesized in some large categories: - Balkan public administrations between tradition and modernity; - National experiences on the impact of the administrative reforms in Balkan states; - Myth or reality in considering â€œa Balkan model of public administrationâ€ ; - Administrative convergence and dynamics as support of the evolution towards a certain model; - Assessing relevant case studies on enforcing NPM in local governance. It is also worth to mention that the approach of the participants in the workshop has been marked by the institutional innovations and trends in European governance, the debates concerning the model and characteristics of the European administration etc. The workshop was organized within the framework of Jean Monnet project â€œSouth-Eastern European developments on the administrative convergence and enlargement of the European Administrative Space in Balkan statesâ€ with the financial support of the European Community.
|This book is provided by South-Eastern European Administrative Studies – ASsee Online Series in its series ASsee Online Series with number 1 and published in 2011.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 318.08.97|
Web page: http://www.balcannet.eu/assee.htm
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Andrei, Tudorel & Matei, Ani & Tusa, Erika & Nedelcu, Monica, 2009. "Characteristics of the Reforming Process in the Romanian Public Administration System," MPRA Paper 19017, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2009.
- Alderman, Harold, 2002. "Do local officials know something we don't? Decentralization of targeted transfers in Albania," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 375-404, March.
- Riccardo Mussari & Denita Cepiku, 2007. "Public administration reform in transition," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 353-375, September.
- Allen Schick, 2002. "Opportunity, strategy and tactics in reforming public management," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 2(3), pages 7-34.
- Christopher J. Jarvis, 1999. "The Rise and Fall of the Pyramid Schemes in Albania," IMF Working Papers 99/98, International Monetary Fund.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsu:asseeb:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ani Matei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
Follow series, journals, authors & more
New papers by email
Subscribe to new additions to RePEc
Public profiles for Economics researchers
Various rankings of research in Economics & related fields
Who was a student of whom, using RePEc
Curated articles & papers various economics topics
Upload your paper to be listed on RePEc and IDEAS
Blog aggregator for economics research
Cases of plagiarism in Economics
Job Market Papers
RePEc working paper series dedicated to the job market
Pretend you are at the helm of an economics department
Services from the StL Fed
Data, research, apps & more from the St. Louis Fed