IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/inarxi/x2vm4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Balancing financial autonomy and control in agencification: issues emerging from the Indonesian higher education (Otonomi dan pengendalian keuangan pada Badan Layanan Umum sektor pendidikan)

Author

Listed:
  • Waluyo, Budi

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the practices of financial autonomy and control and the emerging issue of agencification in the higher education sector. (Paper ini membahas praktik-praktik otonomi dan pengendalian keuangan dalam konteks agensifikasi - Badan Layanan Umum - di sektor pendidikan tinggi).

Suggested Citation

  • Waluyo, Budi, 2018. "Balancing financial autonomy and control in agencification: issues emerging from the Indonesian higher education (Otonomi dan pengendalian keuangan pada Badan Layanan Umum sektor pendidikan)," INA-Rxiv x2vm4, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:inarxi:x2vm4
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/x2vm4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5b25c61f8b4bed0011b6791c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/x2vm4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sjors Overman & Sandra van Thiel, 2016. "Agencification and Public Sector Performance: A systematic comparison in 20 countries," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 611-635, April.
    2. Suzanne Young & Swati Nagpal & Carol A. Adams, 2016. "Sustainable Procurement in Australian and UK Universities," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 993-1016, August.
    3. Bram Verschuere, 2007. "The autonomy -- control balance in Flemish arm's length public agencies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 107-133, March.
    4. Schick, Allen, 1998. "Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand's Reforms," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 13(1), pages 123-131, February.
    5. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498, Decembrie.
    6. Paul Roness & Koen Verhoest & Kristin Rubecksen & Muiris MacCarthaigh, 2008. "Autonomy and Regulation of State Agencies: Reinforcement, Indifference or Compensation?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 155-174, June.
    7. Sjors Overman, 2016. "Great Expectations of Public Service Delegation: A systematic review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1238-1262, September.
    8. Tom Overmans & Klaus-Peter Timm-Arnold, 2016. "Managing Austerity: Comparing municipal austerity plans in the Netherlands and North Rhine-Westphalia," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 1043-1062, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484, December.
    2. Andrews, Matt, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," Working Paper Series 15-063, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    3. Soonae Park & Don S. Lee & Jieun Son, 2021. "Regulatory reform in the era of new technological development: The role of organizational factors in the public sector," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 894-908, July.
    4. Bente Bjørnholt & Heidi Salomonsen, 2015. "Contracting and Performance in Agencies: A Question of Control, Dialogue or Autonomy?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 509-530, December.
    5. Matt Andrews, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," CID Working Papers 303, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    6. Gyldas A. Ofoulhast‐Othamot, 2022. "The perils of a bureaucratic fad in Africa: Examining the effects of the agencification of the state apparatus in Gabon," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 179-189, August.
    7. Bouckaert Geert & Nakrošis Vitalis & Nemec Juraj, 2011. "Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 9-29, July.
    8. William Dunn & David Miller, 2007. "A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 345-358, December.
    9. Andreas Kakouris & Elina Meliou, 2011. "New Public Management: Promote the Public Sector Modernization Through Service Quality. Current Experiences and Future Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 351-369, December.
    10. Lucica Matei & Spyridon Flogaitis (ed.), 2011. "PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE BALKANS - from Weberian bureaucracy to New Public Management," ASsee Online Series, South-Eastern European Administrative Studies – ASsee Online Series, volume 1, number 1, September.
    11. Dietrich Budäus & Dennis Hilgers, 2009. "Reform des öffentlichen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesens in Deutschland," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-396, January.
    12. Dixon, Keith, 2009. "Calculative practices in higher education: a retrospective analysis of curricular accounting about learning," MPRA Paper 18295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kemmerling, Achim & Bruttel, Oliver, 2005. "New politics in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2005-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Leonard, David K. & Bloom, Gerald & Hanson, Kara & O’Farrell, Juan & Spicer, Neil, 2013. "Institutional Solutions to the Asymmetric Information Problem in Health and Development Services for the Poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 71-87.
    15. Ionela Corina Chersan & Valentin Florentin Dumitru & Cãtãlina Gorgan & Vasile Gorgan, 2020. "Green Public Procurement in the Academic Literature," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 1-82, February.
    16. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    17. Roy T. Meyers, 2017. "Is the U.S. Congress an Insurmountable Obstacle to Any “Far-Sighted Conception of Budgeting”?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 5-24, December.
    18. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    19. Bellò, Benedetta & Spano, Alessandro, 2015. "Governing the purple zone: How politicians influence public managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 354-365.
    20. Deborah Wilson, 2011. "Comparative Analysis in Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 293-308, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:inarxi:x2vm4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ios.io/preprints/inarxiv/discover .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.