IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/aelcon/v7y2017i2p137-153n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Step Towards European Public Sector Accounting Harmonisation

Author

Listed:
  • Mussari Riccardo

    (Department of Business and Law Studies, School of Economics and Management, University of Siena, Piazza San Francesco, 7, 53100Siena, Italy)

  • Sorrentino Daniela

    (Department of Business and Law Studies, School of Economics and Management, University of Siena, Piazza San Francesco, 7, 53100Siena, Italy)

Abstract

This paper discusses post-New Public Management (NPM) approaches to current patterns of public management reforms as a path-dependent phenomenon and as proposing corrective solutions to unintended shortcomings of NPM-inspired reforms. Public sector accounting reforms are seen as developing coherently with general public managerial reforms, and as showing a shift in the prioritised purposes assigned to public accounts in line with the overall design of projected reform-making. EU public sector accounting harmonisation is interpreted in this framework, and the Italian experience of public sector accounting reform is discussed in the light of EU membership. Particular emphasis is given to the likely overlap between national and government accounting due to increasingly shared purposes, whereby the former acquires a functional supportive role to the latter. Considerations on the drivers, as well as on the technical solutions of the new Italian public sector accounting system, suggest that Italian public sector accounting has taken a step in the direction of European public sector accounting harmonisation. Finally, the Italian case provides evidence of post-NPM-like accounting reform, contributing to the scanty empirical research on this topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Mussari Riccardo & Sorrentino Daniela, 2017. "Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Step Towards European Public Sector Accounting Harmonisation," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 137-153, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:137-153:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/ael-2017-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2017-0006
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ael-2017-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Mussari & Denita Cepiku, 2007. "Public administration reform in transition," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 353-375, September.
    2. Rowan Jones & Évelyne Lande & Klaus Lüder & Marine Portal, 2013. "A Comparison of Budgeting and Accounting Reforms in the National Governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US," Post-Print hal-02480887, HAL.
    3. Irvine Lapsley & Riccardo Mussari & Gert Paulsson, 2009. "On the Adoption of Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: A Self-Evident and Problematic Reform," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 719-723.
    4. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498, Decembrie.
    5. Walter Kickert, 2007. "Public Management Reforms in Countries with a Napoleonic State Model: France, Italy and Spain," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Christopher Pollitt & Sandra Thiel & Vincent Homburg (ed.), New Public Management in Europe, chapter 3, pages 26-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Olov Olson & Christopher Humphrey & James Guthrie, 2001. "Caught in an evaluatory trap: a dilemma for public services under NPFM," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 505-522.
    7. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2008. "The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 97-116, June.
    8. Hood, Christopher, 1995. "The "new public management" in the 1980s: Variations on a theme," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 93-109.
    9. Biondi Yuri, 2014. "Harmonising European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS): Issues and Perspectives for Europe’s Economy and Society," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 165-178, December.
    10. J. Christiaens & C. Vanhee & F. Manes-Rossi & N. Aversano, 2013. "The Effect of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Reporting: an International Comparison," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/845, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    11. Yuri Biondi, 2016. "Accounting representations of public debt and deficits in European central government accounts: An exploration of anomalies and contradictions," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 205-219, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adhikari, Pawan & Kuruppu, Chamara & Matilal, Sumohon, 2013. "Dissemination and institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms in less developed countries: A comparative study of the Nepalese and Sri Lankan central governments," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 213-230.
    2. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    3. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ferry, Laurence & Zakaria, Zamzulaila & Zakaria, Zarina & Slack, Richard, 2018. "Framing public governance in Malaysia: Rhetorical appeals through accrual accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 170-183.
    5. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    6. Maria del Rocio Moreno-Enguix & Ester Gras-Gil & Joaquin Hernandez-Fernandez, 2017. "An Explanation of Management of Local Governments in Spain Based on the Structure of the Internal Control System," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 18(2), pages 393-410, November.
    7. Antonella Cifalin? & Irene Eleonora Lisi, 2015. "La misurazione delle performance dei servizi domiciliari e residenziali tra riforme istituzionali e applicazioni locali," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(93), pages 9-32.
    8. Daniel E. Bromberg, 2016. "Gatekeepers: How Procurement Personnel Guard Against Hybrid Accountability," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 549-560, December.
    9. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.
    10. Cristian Carini & Laura Rocca & Claudio Teodori & Monica Veneziani, 2017. "The Reporting Entity in Private-Public Accounting Harmonisation. Is Control Enough for the Local Government Consolidated Financial Statements?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 5-29.
    11. Ezzamel, M. & Hyndman, N. & Johnsen, A. & Lapsley, I., 2014. "Reforming central government: An evaluation of an accounting innovation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 409-422.
    12. Meneguzzo, Marco & Fiorani, Gloria & Mititelu, Cristina & Matei, Lucica & Matei, Ani & Cipolleta, Germano, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union: Trajectories of Reforms in Italy and Romania," MPRA Paper 27780, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Biondi Yuri & Soverchia Michela, 2014. "Accounting Rules for the European Communities: A Theoretical Analysis," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 179-214, December.
    14. Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Iosif Plimakis, 2021. "From New Public Management to Public Sector Management Reforms during the pandemic. The effects of Covid-19 on public management reforms and effectiveness," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 576-596, Decembrie.
    15. Francesco Badia & Tiziana Landi & Valentina Montin, 2019. "Innovation in Public Sector Accounting: a New Role for Local Governments?," Working Papers 2019048, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    16. Bruns, Hans-Jürgen, 2014. "Accounting change and value creation in public services—Do relational archetypes make a difference in improving public service performance?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 339-367.
    17. Arnaboldi, Michela & Azzone, Giovanni, 2010. "Constructing performance measurement in the public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 266-282.
    18. E. Bracci & A. Bruno & G. D’Amore & R. Ievoli, 2024. "The integration of performance management and risk management in the public sector: an empirical case," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 137-163, March.
    19. Christian Nitzl & Dennis Hilgers & Bernhard Hirsch & David Lindermüller, 2020. "The Influence of the Organizational Structure, Environment, and Resource Provision on the Use of Accrual Accounting in Municipalities," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(2), pages 271-298, April.
    20. Mari Kobayashi & Kiyoshi Yamamoto & Keiko Ishikawa, 2016. "The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non‐mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 153-161, June.
    21. Alessandro Lombrano, 2021. "Dall?armonizzazione alla standardizzazione contabile. Quale via per la riforma degli ordinamenti contabili europei," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(3), pages 7-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:aelcon:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:137-153:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.