IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this book or follow this series

Standortbedingungen in Polen, Tschechien und Ungarn und die Position Sachsens im Standortwettbewerb : Gutachten im Auftrag der Wirtschaftsförderung Sachsen GmbH

  • Wolfgang Gerstenberger
  • Joachim Jungfer
  • Heinz Schmalholz

In dem Gutachten wird die Standortqualität der vier Länder ausführlich beschrieben und miteinander verglichen und Vorteile und Nachteile innerhalb der einzelnen Länder abgewogen. Viele verschiedene Standortfaktoren - wie u.a. der ordnungspolitische Rahmen, Arbeitsmarktregulierungen, Infrastruktur - werden systematische behandelt und die investitionsrelevanten Determinanten herausgearbeitet, um so interessierten Investoren ihre Entscheidung bei der Standortwahl zu erleichtern.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

in new window

This book is provided by Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich in its series ifo Dresden Studien with number 33 and published in 2002.
Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodrs:33
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 München

Phone: +49-89-9224-0
Fax: +49-89-985369
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Matthew Allen, 2002. "Die Rechte der Arbeitnehmer in Deutschland und im Vereinigten Königreich," Ifo Schnelldienst, Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(02), pages 19-24, 01.
  2. D. Woo & Simon Gray, 2000. "Reconsidering External Financing of Domestic Budget Deficits: Debunking Some Received Wisdom," IMF Policy Discussion Papers 00/8, International Monetary Fund.
  3. Heidemarie C. Sherman, 2000. "Wechselkursoptionen der Beitrittsländer Mittel- und Osteuropas," Ifo Schnelldienst, Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 53(12), pages 11-18, 05.
  4. Heinz Schmalholz, 2000. "Innovationssysteme in Deutschland und Osteuropa: ein Vergleich," ifo Dresden berichtet, Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(01), pages 50-63, 02.
  5. Rogoff, Kenneth, 1999. "Monetary Models of Dollar/Yen/Euro Nominal Exchange Rates: Dead or Undead?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(459), pages F655-59, November.
  6. Anthony J. Richards & David Deddouche, 1999. "Bank Rating Changes and Bank Stock Returns—Puzzling Evidence from the Emerging Markets," IMF Working Papers 99/151, International Monetary Fund.
  7. Oli Havrylyshyn & Donal McGettigan, 1999. "Privatization in Transition Countries: A Sampling of the Literature," IMF Working Papers 99/6, International Monetary Fund.
  8. Heike Belitz & Karl Brenke & Frank Fleischer, 1999. "Ausländische Investoren in den neuen Bundesländern: Potential noch nicht ausgeschöpft," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 66(50), pages 923-930.
  9. Heinz Schmalholz, 2001. "Schlaegt die Hochschulreform Funken aus den Bildungsschmieden fuer mehr Beschaeftigung?," ifo Dresden berichtet, Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 8(03), pages 38-45, 09.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodrs:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.