IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v30y2018i2p125-145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User-Generated Tweets about Global Green Brands: A Sentiment Analysis Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Saba Resnik

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics)

  • Mateja Kos Koklič

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics)

Abstract

Purpose – Microblogging platforms are generating an infinite volume of content on various topics. Therefore, traditional marketing methods can hardly be employed for its effective research, but sentiment analysis has recently emerged to cope with this challenge. While considerable academic effort has been devoted to investigating consumer behavior towards green brands, studies explicitly addressing consumer sentiments regarding such brands are still rare. Hence, we apply the sentiment analysis approach to investigate consumer sentiments towards 26 global green brands. Design/Methodology/Approach – First, we collected a random set of user-generated tweets in English that were posted in a six-month period and included at least one of the selected global green brands. When classifying the posts, we extracted polarity information from a passage, resulting in values ranging from positive to negative. Findings and implications – Based on a relative frequency word count, we found that consumers often express their sentiments about products, their characteristics and personal consequences of using them. Next, we analyzed average positive and negative consumer sentiments. As previously demonstrated, most tweets are either not strongly affective or they are ambiguous. Based on such empirical insights, companies can better manage their brand perception on Twitter and other social media, as an integral part of their proactive marketing strategy. Limitation – The study also has some limitations. It has a limited ability to reveal consumer motivations. The lexicon-based method we used may sometimes fail to recognize subtle forms of linguistic expression. Originality – This research builds onto prior studies on green brands by applying sentiment analysis. It adds to the existing knowledge by investigating consumer sentiments towards 26 global green brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Saba Resnik & Mateja Kos Koklič, 2018. "User-Generated Tweets about Global Green Brands: A Sentiment Analysis Approach," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 30(2), pages 125-145.
  • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:125-145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/311456
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schindler, Diana & Decker, Reinhold, 2013. "Some remarks on the internal consistency of online consumer reviews," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 221-227.
    2. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Kate Sobel & Abdur Chowdury, 2009. "Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(11), pages 2169-2188, November.
    3. Celsi, Richard L & Olson, Jerry C, 1988. "The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 210-224, September.
    4. Chehab, Adham & Liu, Jeanny & Xiao, Yibo, 2016. "More on intangibles: Do stockholders benefit from brand values?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Gras, N. S. B., 1944. "Religion and Business," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(02), pages 27-32, April.
    6. Maja Hosta & Vesna Žabkar, 2016. "Consumer Sustainability and Responsibility: Beyond Green and Ethical Consumption," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 28(2), pages 143-157.
    7. Hui-Ju Wang, 2017. "Determinants of consumers’ purchase behaviour towards green brands," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(13-14), pages 896-918, October.
    8. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2011. "The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 105-113, March.
    9. Long-Chuan Lu & Hsiu-Hua Chang & Alan Chang, 2015. "Consumer Personality and Green Buying Intention: The Mediate Role of Consumer Ethical Beliefs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 205-219, March.
    10. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Kahle, Lynn R. & Kim, Chung-Hyun, 2015. "Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1937-1944.
    11. Decker, Reinhold & Trusov, Michael, 2010. "Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 293-307.
    12. Delia Mocanu & Andrea Baronchelli & Nicola Perra & Bruno Gonçalves & Qian Zhang & Alessandro Vespignani, 2013. "The Twitter of Babel: Mapping World Languages through Microblogging Platforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-9, April.
    13. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    14. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2011. "The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 105-113.
    15. Teodora Roman & Ionel Bostan & Adriana Manolică & Iustin Mitrica, 2015. "Profile of Green Consumers in Romania in Light of Sustainability Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Savio Dimatteo & Joe Schauld & Pei-Shan Yi & Mirco Musolesi, 2017. "Tweeting About Sustainability: Can Emotional Nowcasting Discourage Greenwashing?," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2017-02, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    17. Qingliang Miao & Qiudan Li & Daniel Zeng, 2010. "Fine‐grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(11), pages 2288-2299, November.
    18. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    19. Meena Rambocas & João Gama, 2013. "Marketing Research: The Role Of Sentiment Analysis," FEP Working Papers 489, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    20. Qingliang Miao & Qiudan Li & Daniel Zeng, 2010. "Fine-grained opinion mining by integrating multiple review sources," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(11), pages 2288-2299, November.
    21. Han, Heesup, 2015. "Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 164-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A. Minton & Soo Jiuan Tan & Siok Kuan Tambyah & Richie L. Liu, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability and Consumer Well-Being: An Ethically-Based Examination of Religious and Cultural Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 167-190, January.
    2. Paniagua, Jordi & Sapena, Juan, 2014. "Business performance and social media: Love or hate?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 719-728.
    3. O'Cass, A., 2000. "An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 545-576, October.
    4. Eunae Jung & Hyungun Sung, 2017. "The Influence of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak on Online and Offline Markets for Retail Sales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    6. Tzu-Chun Weng, 2014. "Exploring Customer Knowledge from Social Media to Improve the Performance of Strategy," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 3(2), pages 261-279.
    7. Catherine Viot & Juliette Passebois-Ducros, 2010. "Wine brands or branded wines? The specificity of the French market in terms of the brand," Post-Print hal-01803728, HAL.
    8. Ioana – Julieta Josan, 2020. "Managing the employer brand to attract talents in the organization," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 31(1), pages 24-34, December.
    9. Feng Zhang & Haina Zhang & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2021. "Corporate religiosity and individual decision on conducting entrepreneurial activity: The contingent effects of institutional environments in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 955-978, September.
    10. Baboo, Shabanaz & Nunkoo, Robin & Kock, Florian, 2022. "Social media attachment: Conceptualization and formative index construction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 437-447.
    11. Xu, Jia & Wei, Jiuchang & Zhao, Dingtao, 2016. "Influence of social media on operational efficiency of national scenic spots in china based on three-stage DEA model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 374-388.
    12. Alex Hiller & Tony Woodall, 2019. "Everything Flows: A Pragmatist Perspective of Trade-Offs and Value in Ethical Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 893-912, July.
    13. Griffith, David A. & Lee, Hannah S. & Yalcinkaya, Goksel, 2023. "Understanding the relationship between the use of social media and the prevalence of anxiety at the country level: a multi-country examination," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    14. Colleen E. McClure & Justin M. Lawrence & Todd J. Arnold & Lisa K. Scheer, 2023. "The opportunities and costs of highly involved organizational buyers," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 480-501, March.
    15. Sharma, Piyush & Roy, Rajat & Rabbanee, Fazlul K., 2020. "Interactive effects of situational and enduring involvement with perceived crowding and time pressure in pay-what-you-want (PWYW) pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 88-100.
    16. Ying-Chih Chang & Tsu-Ming Yeh & Fan-Yun Pai & Tai-Peng Huang, 2018. "Sport Activity for Health!! The Effects of Karate Participants’ Involvement, Perceived Value, and Leisure Benefits on Recommendation Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Žitkienė Rima & Kriaučiūnaitė-Lazauskienė Gintarė, 2019. "The Interplay of Religious Symbols and Cultural Values Theory in Advertising," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 119-137, June.
    18. Shalom Levy & Israel Nebenzahl, 2008. "The influence of product involvement on consumers’ interactive processes in interactive television," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 65-77, March.
    19. Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique & Chamhuri Siwar & Basri Talib & Farah Hasan Sarah & Norshamliza Chamhuri, 2014. "Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Mazurek, Grzegorz & Małagocka, Karolina, 2019. "What if you ask and they say yes? Consumers' willingness to disclose personal data is stronger than you think," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 751-759.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:125-145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.