IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v55y2016i2p97-123.html

Factor Market Rivalry: Toward an Integrated Understanding of Firm Action

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Schwieterman
  • Jason Miller

Abstract

Business organizations are increasingly competing to secure key resources such as scarce raw materials, patentable technologies, transportation capacity, channels of distribution, and preferential customer status. This competition, termed factor market rivalry (FMR), has implications for supply chain theory and managerial practice, especially in the transportation sector. In this article, we adopt a conceptual theory‐building approach in order to influence future discourse on FMR. Specifically, we integrate existing literature to develop a typology of the mechanisms through which FMR can affect firm performance and introduce a framework illustrating the different types of actions firms can take in response to FMR and to utilize FMR to complement existing competitive repertoires. We describe theoretical and managerial implications and suggest several directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Schwieterman & Jason Miller, 2016. "Factor Market Rivalry: Toward an Integrated Understanding of Firm Action," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 97-123, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:55:y:2016:i:2:p:97-123
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0097
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay B. Barney, 1986. "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1231-1241, October.
    2. John E. Bell & Chad W. Autry & Stanley E. Griffis, 2015. "Supply Chain Interdiction as a Competitive Weapon," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 89-103, January.
    3. Justine S. Hastings & Richard J. Gilbert, 2005. "Market Power, Vertical Integration And The Wholesale Price Of Gasoline," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 469-492, December.
    4. Hans Theo Normann, 2011. "Vertical Mergers, Foreclosure And Raising Rivals' Costs – Experimental Evidence," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 506-527, September.
    5. Israel M. Kirzner, 1997. "Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 60-85, March.
    6. Suzuki, Ayako, 2009. "Market foreclosure and vertical merger: A case study of the vertical merger between Turner Broadcasting and Time Warner," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 532-543, July.
    7. Cooper, James C. & Froeb, Luke M. & O'Brien, Dan & Vita, Michael G., 2005. "Vertical antitrust policy as a problem of inference," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(7-8), pages 639-664, September.
    8. Niels J. Pulles & Jasper Veldman & Holger Schiele & Henk Sierksma, 2014. "Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 50(3), pages 16-36, July.
    9. Patrick Bolton & Michael D. Whinston, 1993. "Incomplete Contracts, Vertical Integration, and Supply Assurance," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(1), pages 121-148.
    10. Micha Hirschinger & Alexander Spickermann & Evi Hartmann & Heiko Gracht & Inga-Lena Darkow, 2015. "The Future of Logistics in Emerging Markets—Fuzzy Clustering Scenarios Grounded in Institutional and Factor-Market Rivalry Theory," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(4), pages 73-93, October.
    11. Ming-Jer Chen & Danny Miller, 2015. "Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: A multidimensional framework," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 758-775, May.
    12. Walter J. Ferrier & Douglas W. Lyon, 2004. "Competitive repertoire simplicity and firm performance: The moderating role of top management team heterogeneity," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6-7), pages 317-327.
    13. Marvel, Howard P, 1977. "Factory Regulation: A Reinterpretation of Early English Experience," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(2), pages 379-402, October.
    14. Ming-Jer Chen & Ken G. Smith & Curtis M. Grimm, 1992. "Action Characteristics as Predictors of Competitive Responses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 439-455, March.
    15. Sidney G. Winter, 2000. "The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 981-996, October.
    16. Luiz F. Mesquita & Jaideep Anand & Thomas H. Brush, 2008. "Comparing the resource‐based and relational views: knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 913-941, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan Phares & Jason W. Miller & Stephen V. Burks, 2025. "Shedding light on truck driver supply and demand: Heterogeneous state‐level recovery of trucking employment following the COVID‐19 employment shock," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(1), January.
    2. Hao Su & Martin E. Dresner, 2021. "Multimarket Contact and Capacity: Evidence from the US Airline Industry," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(3), pages 258-306, June.
    3. Joshua R. Schumm & Peter M. Ralston & Matthew A. Schwieterman, 2024. "The challenges of supply side obsolescence: Obsolescence procurement's past, present, and future," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 7-23, January.
    4. Wei, Zelong & Zhang, Dejian, 2025. "Speed advantages or profiting from imitation? The imitation dilemma in the follower strategy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Tobias Schoenherr, 2018. "Leveraging Suppliers for Product Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Intellectual Capital," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(4), pages 365-398, November.
    6. Matthew A. Schwieterman & Thomas J. Goldsby & A. Michael Knemeyer, 2017. "Advocating Customer and Supplier Portfolios in Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 429-476, October.
    7. Jason W. Miller & Jessica L. Darby & Alex Scott, 2022. "The Moderating Effect of COVID‐19 on the Relationship between Spot Market Prices and Capital Investment in the Motor‐Carrier Sector," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 151-194, March.
    8. Lila Al‐Shwaf & John E. Bell, 2025. "Raw Material Supply Risks: Examining Extraction and Geopolitical Conflict," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), April.
    9. Peter Ralston & Steve LeMay & Rose Opengart, 2017. "Factor Market Myopia: A Driver of Factor Market Rivalry," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 167-183, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Ralston & Steve LeMay & Rose Opengart, 2017. "Factor Market Myopia: A Driver of Factor Market Rivalry," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 167-183, April.
    2. Chih-Yi, Su & Bou-Wen, Lin, 2021. "Attack and defense in patent-based competition: A new paradigm of strategic decision-making in the era of the fourth industrial revolution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Miller, Danny & Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle, 2025. "Competitive dynamics in family firms: Transactional versus communal approaches," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    4. Christian Hofer & Jordan M. Barker & Laura D'Oria & Jonathan L. Johnson, 2022. "Broadening our understanding of interfirm rivalry: A call for research on how supply networks shape competitive behavior and performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 8-25, April.
    5. Nianxin Wang & Yuxue Yang & Yulin Fang & Huifang Li & Angela Lu, 2023. "Growing user base in the early stage of sharing economy platforms: An integration of competitive repertoire and institutional legitimacy theories," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(11), pages 3484-3503, November.
    6. Ana Câmara & Federico Aime & Oleg Petrenko, 2023. "We act therefore we are: A theory of action‐driven strategy," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4722-4738, December.
    7. Marissa Beck & Fiona Scott Morton, 2021. "Evaluating the Evidence on Vertical Mergers," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 59(2), pages 273-302, September.
    8. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    9. Rajat Mishra & Randy Napier & Mahmut Yasar, 2019. "Do competitors respond to capacity changes? Evidence from U.S. manufacturers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 159-172, December.
    10. Claudia M. Landeo, 2018. "Exclusionary vertical restraints and antitrust: experimental law and economics contributions," Chapters, in: Joshua C. Teitelbaum & Kathryn Zeiler (ed.), Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics, chapter 3, pages 75-100, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11029 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Namgyoo Park & John Mezias & Jinju Lee & Jae-Hoon Han, 2014. "Reverse knowledge diffusion: Competitive dynamics and the knowledge seeking behavior of Korean high-tech firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 355-375, June.
    13. David T. W. Wong & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2025. "The effects of analytics capability and sensing capability on operations performance: the moderating role of data-driven culture," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 350(2), pages 781-816, July.
    14. Oschmann, Sebastian, 2025. "Vertical market structure matters: The case of a horizontal retail merger in the German gasoline market," DICE Discussion Papers 418, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    15. Jianhong Chen & Wan‐Chien Lien & Danny Miller & Tianxu Chen, 2024. "Competitive Actions under Analyst Pressure: The Role of CEO Time Horizons," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1916-1945, July.
    16. Kensuke Kubo, 2011. "Explaining vertical integration in the generic pharmaceutical industry," Discussion Papers 11-02, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    17. Kyle J. Mayer & Deepak Somaya & Ian O. Williamson, 2012. "Firm-Specific, Industry-Specific, and Occupational Human Capital and the Sourcing of Knowledge Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1311-1329, October.
    18. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    19. Johannes Boehm & Jan Sonntag, 2023. "Vertical Integration and Foreclosure: Evidence from Production Network Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 141-161, January.
    20. Barker, Jordan M. & Gibson, Andrew R. & Hofer, Adriana R. & Hofer, Christian & Moussaoui, Issam & Scott, Marc A., 2021. "A competitive dynamics perspective on the diversification of third-party logistics providers’ service portfolios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    21. Tung-Shan Liao, 2017. "Interaction Model of Superior Performance Based on Technological Resources and Competitive Actions in the Nascent Cycle of the Tablet Industry," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(11), pages 218-231, 11-2017.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:55:y:2016:i:2:p:97-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.