IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i1p902-916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the blockades to electric vehicle mobility in an emerging economy: Toward a triple bottom line sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Tushar Gahlaut
  • Gourav Dwivedi
  • Ashish Dwivedi

Abstract

The emerging economies are moving toward electric vehicles (EVs), which are much sustainable means of transportation. However, many social, economic, and technological blockades of EV mobility remain to be addressed. The study investigates social, economic, and technological blockades for e‐mobility in an emerging economy and simultaneously concentrating on their existing and future business implications. Identification of e‐mobility blockades is obtained through literature review and consensus of the experts. Kappa analysis is used to strain the priority map of the mentioned blockades on the basis of developing consensus among experts. Thereafter, a multi criteria decision making approach that is, best‐worst method is adopted to rank the identified potential blockades. The study models the social, economic, and technological blockades of EV mobility in context of emerging economy. To cater blockades in a desired sequence, the study further suggests the ranking sequence of blockades to enhance e‐mobility toward sustainable development. The findings from the study reveals that “costs associated with EVs and “the lack of government policies, standards, and regulations” are the most important blockades to sustainable EV adoption. Thus, the organizations and the Government need to find ways to reduce the cost of EVs and simultaneously should plan and develop policies to enhance EV adoption and to reduce the usage of gasoline vehicles. The third most important blockade that is, “low demand due to undetermined sustainable benefits” indicates that there is an urgent need to spread awareness among the consumers about the sustainable benefits for the adoption of EVs. Further, the sensitivity analysis reveals that sensitivity range for weightage of the group of academicians lies between 0.3 and 0.7 on a scale of 1. If more weightage is provided to the practical scenario, it is discovered that “location of charging station (BEV4)” is more important than “lack of flexible distribution network (BEV2)” to enhance the amount of EV adoption in India. The study provides insights to practitioners dealing with e‐mobility in emerging economies, showing the appropriate sequence of the blockades to help them build up strategies to mitigate these blockades.

Suggested Citation

  • Tushar Gahlaut & Gourav Dwivedi & Ashish Dwivedi, 2024. "Analyzing the blockades to electric vehicle mobility in an emerging economy: Toward a triple bottom line sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 902-916, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:902-916
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Egbue, Ona & Long, Suzanna, 2012. "Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 717-729.
    2. Zhengxia He & Yanqing Zhou & Jianming Wang & Cunfang Li & Meiling Wang & Wenbo Li, 2021. "The impact of motivation, intention, and contextual factors on green purchasing behavior: New energy vehicles as an example," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1249-1269, February.
    3. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen & Hualan Wang & Bogusław Łazarz, 2020. "A Holistic Approach to Electric Shared Mobility Systems Development—Modelling and Optimization Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Patyal, Vishal Singh & Kumar, Ravi & Kushwah, Shiksha, 2021. "Modeling barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: An Indian perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Noel, Lance & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2020. "The market case for electric mobility: Investigating electric vehicle business models for mass adoption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Amith Khandakar & Annaufal Rizqullah & Anas Ashraf Abdou Berbar & Mohammad Rafi Ahmed & Atif Iqbal & Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury & S. M. Ashfaq Uz Zaman, 2020. "A Case Study to Identify the Hindrances to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Qatar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Wolf, Ingo & Schröder, Tobias & Neumann, Jochen & de Haan, Gerhard, 2015. "Changing minds about electric cars: An empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 269-285.
    8. Lieven, Theo, 2015. "Policy measures to promote electric mobility – A global perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 78-93.
    9. Ibham Veza & Mohd Azman Abas & Djati Wibowo Djamari & Noreffendy Tamaldin & Fitri Endrasari & Bentang Arief Budiman & Muhammad Idris & Anthony C. Opia & Firman Bagja Juangsa & Muhammad Aziz, 2022. "Electric Vehicles in Malaysia and Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Fa-Ping Wang & Jia-Li Yu & Peng Yang & Li-Xin Miao & Bin Ye, 2017. "Analysis of the Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Shenzhen China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Matthews, Lindsay & Lynes, Jennifer & Riemer, Manuel & Del Matto, Tania & Cloet, Nicholas, 2017. "Do we have a car for you? Encouraging the uptake of electric vehicles at point of sale," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 79-88.
    12. Anna Cabigiosu, 2022. "Sustainable development and incumbents' open innovation strategies for a greener competence‐destroying technology: The case of electric vehicles," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2315-2336, July.
    13. Tiande Mo & Kin-tak Lau & Yu Li & Chi-kin Poon & Yinghong Wu & Paul K. Chu & Yang Luo, 2022. "Commercialization of Electric Vehicles in Hong Kong," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Steinhilber, Simone & Wells, Peter & Thankappan, Samarthia, 2013. "Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 531-539.
    15. Morris, David & Madzudzo, Garikayi & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis, 2020. "Cybersecurity threats in the auto industry: Tensions in the knowledge environment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    17. Schroeder, Andreas & Traber, Thure, 2012. "The economics of fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 136-144.
    18. Ruoso, Ana Cristina & Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte, 2022. "An assessment of barriers and solutions for the deployment of electric vehicles in the Brazilian market," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 218-229.
    19. Munshi, Talat & Dhar, Subash & Painuly, Jyoti, 2022. "Understanding barriers to electric vehicle adoption for personal mobility: A case study of middle income in-service residents in Hyderabad city, India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Noel, Lance & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Navigating expert skepticism and consumer distrust: Rethinking the barriers to vehicle-to-grid (V2G) in the Nordic region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Khan & Karl Behrendt & Dimitrios Papadas & Lydia Arnold, 2025. "‘Strategic sustainable development: The role of intermediaries in managing the sustainability compliance of a multi‐tier crop agri‐food supply chain. A developing economy perspective’," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 992-1013, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hong & Irfan, Muhammad & Ai, Fengyi & Al-Aiban, Khalid M. & Abbas, Shujaat, 2024. "Analyzing barriers to the adoption and development of electric vehicles: A roadmap towards sustainable transportation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Neaimeh, Myriam & Salisbury, Shawn D. & Hill, Graeme A. & Blythe, Philip T. & Scoffield, Don R. & Francfort, James E., 2017. "Analysing the usage and evidencing the importance of fast chargers for the adoption of battery electric vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 474-486.
    3. Ye Yang & Zhongfu Tan, 2019. "Investigating the Influence of Consumer Behavior and Governmental Policy on the Diffusion of Electric Vehicles in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Moon-Koo Kim & Jong-Hyun Park & Kyungsoo Kim & Byoungkyu Park, 2020. "Identifying factors influencing the slow market diffusion of electric vehicles in Korea," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 663-688, April.
    5. Peng, Ruoqing & Tang, Justin Hayse Chiwing G. & Yang, Xiong & Meng, Meng & Zhang, Jie & Zhuge, Chengxiang, 2024. "Investigating the factors influencing the electric vehicle market share: A comparative study of the European Union and United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    6. Jain, Monika & Singh, Archana, 2024. "An empirical study on electric vehicle adoption in India: A step towards a greener environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 112-125.
    7. Berkeley, Nigel & Bailey, David & Jones, Andrew & Jarvis, David, 2017. "Assessing the transition towards Battery Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Level Perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 320-332.
    8. Trencher, Gregory & Taeihagh, Araz & Yarime, Masaru, 2020. "Overcoming barriers to developing and diffusing fuel-cell vehicles: Governance strategies and experiences in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    9. Christos Karolemeas & Stefanos Tsigdinos & Panagiotis G. Tzouras & Alexandros Nikitas & Efthimios Bakogiannis, 2021. "Determining Electric Vehicle Charging Station Location Suitability: A Qualitative Study of Greek Stakeholders Employing Thematic Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Jain, Shanu & Gautam, Shalini & Malik, Priyanka & Kumar, Sushant & Krishnan, Chitra, 2025. "A multi-phase qualitative study on consumers’ barriers and drivers of electric vehicle use in India: Policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Sheykhfard, Abbas & Azmoodeh, Mohammad & Das, Subasish & Kutela, Boniphace, 2025. "Analyzing purchase intentions of used electric vehicles through consumer experiences: A structural equation modeling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 125-137.
    12. Goel, Pooja & Kumar, Aalok & Parayitam, Satyanarayana & Luthra, Sunil, 2023. "Understanding transport users' preferences for adopting electric vehicle based mobility for sustainable city: A moderated moderated-mediation model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Patyal, Vishal Singh & Kumar, Ravi & Kushwah, Shiksha, 2021. "Modeling barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: An Indian perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    14. Nordlund, A. & Jansson, J. & Westin, K., 2018. "Acceptability of electric vehicle aimed measures: Effects of norm activation, perceived justice and effectiveness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 205-213.
    15. František Pollák & Josef Vodák & Jakub Soviar & Peter Markovič & Gianluca Lentini & Valerio Mazzeschi & Alessandro Luè, 2021. "Promotion of Electric Mobility in the European Union—Overview of Project PROMETEUS from the Perspective of Cohesion through Synergistic Cooperation on the Example of the Catching-Up Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Konstantina Anastasiadou & Nikolaos Gavanas, 2022. "State-of-the-Art Review of the Key Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Adoption by Consumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Schallehn, Frauke & Valogianni, Konstantina, 2022. "Sustainability awareness and smart meter privacy concerns: The cases of US and Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Jiali Yu & Peng Yang & Kai Zhang & Faping Wang & Lixin Miao, 2018. "Evaluating the Effect of Policies and the Development of Charging Infrastructure on Electric Vehicle Diffusion in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Kim, Moon-Koo & Oh, Jeesun & Park, Jong-Hyun & Joo, Changlim, 2018. "Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 799-809.
    20. Alabi, Oluwafisayo & Turner, Karen & Figus, Gioele & Katris, Antonios & Calvillo, Christian, 2020. "Can spending to upgrade electricity networks to support electric vehicles (EVs) roll-outs unlock value in the wider economy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:902-916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.