IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v43y2022i6p2066-2082.html

The top management team and enterprise innovation: An empirical study from growth enterprise market listed companies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Minshu Zhao
  • Fangying Yuan

Abstract

The characteristics of top management teams are one of the main factors affecting the innovation performance of a company. In this study, a fixed effect model is constructed by introducing salary and equity incentives as moderating variables, using growth enterprise market (GEM) listed companies as research samples for empirical analysis to explore the impact of different executive characteristics on enterprise innovation performance and the related influencing mechanism. The results show that the different characteristics of top management teams have different influences on the intensity of research and development (R&D) investment efficiency and innovation output. Importantly, equity incentives play a more significant moderating role than salary incentives. After distinguishing the nature of regions, we found that location factors result in different preferences for executives, which will affect the correlation between executive characteristics and innovation performance. We found that, combined with China's unique political system, the impact of team tenure and education level on innovation performance is opposite based on the nature of property rights. Finally, corresponding management suggestions are made covering three aspects: governance structure, incentive scheme, and measures relating to local conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Minshu Zhao & Fangying Yuan, 2022. "The top management team and enterprise innovation: An empirical study from growth enterprise market listed companies in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2066-2082, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:6:p:2066-2082
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3509
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ye, Qingyan & Wang, Duanxu & Guo, Weixiao, 2019. "Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 468-480.
    2. Alberto Galasso & Timothy S. Simcoe, 2011. "CEO Overconfidence and Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1469-1484, August.
    3. Rajiv D. Banker & Danlu Bu & Mihir N. Mehta, 2016. "Pay Gap and Performance in China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(3), pages 501-531, September.
    4. Biggerstaff, Lee & Blank, Brian & Goldie, Brad, 2019. "Do incentives work? Option-based compensation and corporate innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 415-430.
    5. Ya You & Shuba Srinivasan & Koen Pauwels & Amit Joshi, 2020. "How CEO/CMO characteristics affect innovation and stock returns: findings and future directions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1229-1253, November.
    6. Kato, Takao & Owan, Hideo, 2011. "Market characteristics, intra-firm coordination, and the choice of human resource management systems: Theory and evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 375-396.
    7. David Hirshleifer & Angie Low & Siew Hong Teoh, 2012. "Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(4), pages 1457-1498, August.
    8. Talke, Katrin & Salomo, Søren & Kock, Alexander, 2011. "Top ManagementTeam Diversity and Strategic Innovation Orientation: The Relationship and Consequences for Innovativeness and Performance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63286, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Alexander S. Alexiev & Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2010. "Top Management Team Advice Seeking and Exploratory Innovation: The Moderating Role of TMT Heterogeneity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7), pages 1343-1364, November.
    10. Talke, Katrin & Salomo, Sören & Rost, Katja, 2010. "How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 907-918, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Liping & Chen, Qisheng & Li, Jing & Chen, Jin & Jia, Ximeng, 2024. "The impact of board capital on open innovation with the moderating effect of executive equity incentives," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Kurzhals & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy & Andreas König, 2020. "Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 437-464, November.
    2. Gu, Flora F. & Leung, Fine F. & Wang, Danny T. & Tang, Yi, 2024. "Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: Executive hubris and its impact on customer acquisition and retention," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 362-382.
    3. Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah & Muhammad Anwar & Ch. Mazhar Hussain, 2021. "Top managers' attributes, innovation, and the participation in China–Pakistan Economic Corridor: A study of energy sector small and medium‐sized enterprises," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 385-406, March.
    4. Ya You & Shuba Srinivasan & Koen Pauwels & Amit Joshi, 2020. "How CEO/CMO characteristics affect innovation and stock returns: findings and future directions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1229-1253, November.
    5. Tuck Siong Chung & Angie Low & Roland T. Rust, 2023. "Executive confidence and myopic marketing management," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1118-1142, September.
    6. Sun, Lan & Liu, Shaobo & Chen, Peng, 2022. "Does the paternalism of founder-managers improve firm innovation? Evidence from Chinese non-state-owned listed firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Cao, Jian & Chen, Feng & Li, Mingxiang & Luo, Xin, 2025. "Accounting backgrounds and technological innovation: Are accountant CEOs inferior innovators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    8. Mehrabi, Hamed & Coviello, Nicole & Ranaweera, Chatura, 2021. "When is top management team heterogeneity beneficial for product exploration? Understanding the role of institutional pressures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 775-786.
    9. Michaela Wrede & Vivek K. Velamuri & Tobias Dauth, 2020. "Top managers in the digital age: Exploring the role and practices of top managers in firms' digital transformation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1549-1567, December.
    10. Jiang Cheng & Hung-Gay Fung & Tzu-Ting Lin & Min-Ming Wen, 2024. "CEO optimism and the use of credit default swaps: evidence from the US life insurance industry," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 169-194, July.
    11. Ulrike Malmendier & Vincenzo Pezone & Hui Zheng, 2023. "Managerial Duties and Managerial Biases," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3174-3201, June.
    12. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 36-50.
    13. Lu, Jing & Ho, Keng-Yu & Ho, Po-Hsin & Ko, Kuan-Cheng, 2023. "CEO overconfidence, lottery preference and the cross-section of stock returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Prokudina, Elena & Renneboog, Luc & Tobler, Philippe, 2015. "Does Confidence Predict Out-of-Domain Effort?," Discussion Paper 2015-055, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Andres Felipe Cortes & Pol Herrmann, 2019. "Ceo Transformational Leadership And Sme Innovation: The Mediating Role Of Social Capital And Employee Participation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-25, April.
    16. Adam, Tim R. & Burg, Valentin & Scheinert, Tobias & Streitz, Daniel, 2014. "Managerial Optimism and Debt Contract Design: The Case of Syndicated Loans," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 475, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    17. Pham, Ly Thi Minh & Vo, Lai Van & Le, Huong Thi Thu & Le, Danh Vinh, 2018. "Asset liquidity and firm innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 225-234.
    18. Sun, Helin & Cappa, Francesco & Zhu, Jia & Peruffo, Enzo, 2023. "The effect of CEO social capital, CEO duality and state-ownership on corporate innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Cho, Chanho & Halford, Joseph T. & Hsu, Scott & Ng, Lilian, 2016. "Do managers matter for corporate innovation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 206-229.
    20. Aghazadeh, Sanaz & Joe, Jennifer R., 2022. "Auditors' response to management confidence and misstatement risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:6:p:2066-2082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.