IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i2p1412-1443.html

Corporate social responsibility and family firm performance: A meta‐analytic review

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Oduro
  • Rana Muhammad Umar
  • Alfredo De Massis
  • Leul Girma Haylemariam

Abstract

Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) has received considerable attention in family firms, empirical findings on the CSR/family firm performance nexus are mixed and inconsistent. This meta‐analytic review aims to clarify the mixed results by establishing the degree to which CSR influences family firm performance and to test the moderating effects of contextual and methodological factors. Integrating a sample of 85 studies published up to May 2023 with 152,265 observations and employing a psychometric meta‐analysis through bivariate and meta‐regression analyses, we find that the average effect of CSR on family firm performance is positive, though small (≤0.20). Our study further reveals that CSR is positively and significantly related to financial performance, innovation, reputation, and sustainability, but the impact on firm sustainability is the largest. Our moderation analysis shows that the relationship between CSR and family firm performance is moderated by contextual factors (i.e., family ownership concentration, firm size, stock exchange listing, culture, and rule of law) and methodological factors (i.e., publication type, data type, performance proxy, and study type). Theoretically, our study appears to be the foremost meta‐analytic review on the CSR/family firm performance relationship, as previous meta‐analyses have focused on the drivers of CSR in family firms. Practically, we demonstrate that family firms can leverage CSR as both a “failure‐prevention” strategy (i.e., survival strategy) and a “success‐inducing” strategy (competitive advantage).

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Oduro & Rana Muhammad Umar & Alfredo De Massis & Leul Girma Haylemariam, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility and family firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1412-1443, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:1412-1443
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bingham & W. Gibb Dyer & Isaac Smith & Gregory Adams, 2011. "A Stakeholder Identity Orientation Approach to Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(4), pages 565-585, April.
    2. Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2016. "Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 48-64.
    3. Li, Xinlan & Li, Changhong & Wang, Zhan & Jiao, Wenting & Pang, Yiwen, 2021. "The effect of corporate philanthropy on corporate performance of Chinese family firms: The moderating role of religious atmosphere," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Saim Kashmiri & Vijay Mahajan, 2014. "A Rose by Any Other Name: Are Family Firms Named After Their Founding Families Rewarded More for Their New Product Introductions?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 81-99, September.
    5. Boubaker, Sabri & Labégorre, Florence, 2008. "Ownership structure, corporate governance and analyst following: A study of French listed firms," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 961-976, June.
    6. Torben Pedersen & Steen Thomsen, 2003. "Ownership Structure and Value of the Largest European Firms: The Importance of Owner Identity," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 27-55, March.
    7. Waseem Akhter & Arshad Hassan, 2024. "Does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance? Empirical evidence from BRICS countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 566-578, January.
    8. Eneizan, Bilal M. & Matar, Ali & Al-Zawahreh, Abdelghafour & Alkhawaldeh, Abdelbaset M. & Eneizan, Odai, 2019. "Effects of green marketing strategy on firm financial performance. The moderating role of government policy," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 15(2).
    9. Oduro, Stephen & De Nisco, Alessandro & Mainolfi, Giada, 2023. "Do digital technologies pay off? A meta-analytic review of the digital technologies/firm performance nexus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Priyanka Aggarwal & Reetesh Kumar Singh, 2022. "Synthesizing the affinity between employees' internal‐external CSR perceptions and work outcomes: A meta‐analytic investigation," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 1053-1101, October.
    11. Margarete Schellong & Nils D. Kraiczy & Lucia Malär & Andreas Hack, 2019. "Family Firm Brands, Perceptions of Doing Good, and Consumer Happiness," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(5), pages 921-946, September.
    12. Hart O. Awa & Willie Etim & Enyinda Ogbonda, 2024. "Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Madden, Laura & McMillan, Amy & Harris, Oneil, 2020. "Drivers of selectivity in family firms: Understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2).
    14. Tenuta, Paolo & Cambrea, Domenico Rocco, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The role of executive directors in family firms," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    15. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    16. Michael Greiner & Jing Sun, 2021. "How corporate social responsibility can incentivize top managers: A commitment to sustainability as an agency intervention," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1360-1375, July.
    17. Marcello M. Mariani & Khowlah Al-Sultan & Alfredo De Massis, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A systematic literature review," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(3), pages 1192-1246, May.
    18. Éric Archambault & David Campbell & Yves Gingras & Vincent Larivière, 2009. "Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(7), pages 1320-1326, July.
    19. Marcus Wagner, 2010. "Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(4), pages 581-594, July.
    20. Christian Espinosa-Méndez & Carlos P. Maquieira & José T. Arias, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Performance on the Value of Family Firms: The Moderating Role of Financial Constraints and Agency Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    21. Carla Curado & António Mota, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    22. Thomas M. Zellweger & Robert S. Nason & Mattias Nordqvist & Candida G. Brush, 2013. "Why Do Family Firms Strive for Nonfinancial Goals? An Organizational Identity Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(2), pages 229-248, March.
    23. Zabihollah Rezaee, 2016. "Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective," Journal of Accounting Literature, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 48-64, June.
    24. Yan Zuo & Shenyang Jiang & Jiang Wei, 2022. "Can corporate social responsibility mitigate the liability of newness? Evidence from China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 573-592, August.
    25. Edward Fosu & Kaigang Yi & Deborah Asiedu, 2024. "The effect of CSR on corporate social performance: Mediating role of corporate image, green innovation and moderating role of corporate identity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 69-88, January.
    26. Bazeet Olayemi Badru & Ameen Qasem, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and dividend payments in the Malaysian capital market: the interacting effect of family-controlled companies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 283-306, April.
    27. Lorraine Uhlaner & Franz Kellermanns & Kimberly Eddleston & Frank Hoy, 2012. "Erratum to: The entrepreneuring family: a new paradigm for family business research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 13-13, January.
    28. David L. Deephouse & Peter Jaskiewicz, 2013. "Do Family Firms Have Better Reputations Than Non-Family Firms? An Integration of Socioemotional Wealth and Social Identity Theories," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 337-360, May.
    29. Rosalia Santulli & Mariateresa Torchia & Andrea Calabrò & Carmen Gallucci, 2019. "Family ownership concentration and firm internationalization: integrating principal-principal and socioemotional wealth perspectives," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 220-248, June.
    30. Sana Noor & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Muhammad Awais, 2020. "CSR permanency, family ownership, and firm value: Evidence from emerging economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2135-2149, September.
    31. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2022. "Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management: The Moderating Effect of ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    32. Davila, Jessenia & Duran, Patricio & Gómez-Mejía, Luis & Sanchez-Bueno, Maria J., 2023. "Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A meta-analytic integration," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    33. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christodoulides, Paul & Strømfeldt Eduardsen, Jonas, 2023. "A dynamic capabilities perspective to socially responsible family business: Implications on social-based advantage and market performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    34. repec:eme:jal000:j.acclit.2016.05.003 is not listed on IDEAS
    35. Alberto Citterio & Rossella Locatelli & Andrea Uselli, 2024. "Mapping Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: A Bibliometric Review across Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, January.
    36. Hüseyin Doluca & Marcus Wagner & Jörn Block, 2018. "Sustainability and Environmental Behaviour in Family Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis of Environment‐Related Activities, Innovation and Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 152-172, January.
    37. Le Ha Diem Chi & Le Dinh Hac & Nguyen Quang Nhat & Bui Thi Thu Hang, 2022. "Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of ownership structure and listing status of Vietnam banks," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2087286-208, December.
    38. Xindong Xue & Mingmei Cheng & Wangyongxin Zhang, 2021. "Does Education Really Improve Health? A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 71-105, February.
    39. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2018. "Do Customers Value CSR Disclosure? Evidence from Italian Family and Non-Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    40. Martina Sageder & Christine Mitter & Birgit Feldbauer‐Durstmüller, 2018. "Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 335-377, January.
    41. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    42. Rajat Panwar & Erlend Nybakk & Eric Hansen & Jonatan Pinkse, 2017. "Does the Business Case Matter? The Effect of a Perceived Business Case on Small Firms’ Social Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 597-608, September.
    43. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    44. Christoph Stock & Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 199-259, February.
    45. Huang, Kaixing & Sim, Nicholas & Zhao, Hong, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, corporate financial performance and the confounding effects of economic fluctuations: A meta-analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    46. Linda S. Niehm & Jane Swinney & Nancy J. Miller, 2008. "Community Social Responsibility and Its Consequences for Family Business Performance," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 331-350, July.
    47. Jeremy Galbreath, 2017. "The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 358-370, March.
    48. Stephen Oduro & Alessandro De Nisco, 2023. "From Industry 4.0 adoption to innovation ambidexterity to firm performance: a MASEM analysis," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(8), pages 3060-3082, June.
    49. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2017. "Earnings Management and CSR Disclosure. Family vs. Non-Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Gangi & Nicola Varrone & Lucia Michela Daniele & Eugenio D'Angelo & Maria Coscia, 2025. "Does It Pay for Family Firms to Go Green? The Moderating Role of Familiness," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5490-5520, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Gangi & Nicola Varrone & Lucia Michela Daniele & Eugenio D'Angelo & Maria Coscia, 2025. "Does It Pay for Family Firms to Go Green? The Moderating Role of Familiness," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 5490-5520, July.
    2. ChangYi Zhu & Alexandra Simón Villar & BingBing Ge, 2026. "Environmental, Social, and Governance in Family Firms: A Bibliometric Review and Agenda for Future Research," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 593-613, April.
    3. Limin Geng & Xueyuan Lu & Can Zhang, 2023. "The Theoretical Lineage and Evolutionary Logic of Research on the Environmental Behavior of Family Firms: A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Christoph Stock & Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 199-259, February.
    5. Ramona Waldau, 2025. "A systematic literature review on determinants and outcomes of ESG performance in family firms," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3357-3415, December.
    6. Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2023. "Openness to knowledge: does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between familiness and absorptive capacity?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1449-1482, April.
    7. Stutz, Adrian & Schell, Sabrina & Hack, Andreas, 2022. "In family firms we trust – Experimental evidence on the credibility of sustainability reporting: A replication study with extension," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(4).
    8. Luis Alberto Otero‐González & Raquel Esther Querentes‐Hermida & Pablo Durán‐Santomil & María Garrido‐Ruso, 2026. "Impact of ESG Practices on Financial and Risk Performance in Family Businesses," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 1302-1323, March.
    9. Gianluca Ginesti & Mario Ossorio, 2025. "The Impact of Family Determinants on the Media Coverage of Family Business Activism in Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2835-2847, March.
    10. Zhao, Yali & Zhou, Ran & Pang, Liyuan, 2025. "Impact of family business identity on green innovation: The moderating role of family culture," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    11. Sang‐Joon Kim & Jongwan Bae & SoHyeon Kang, 2024. "The cross‐cutting pursuit of family values: When and how do family firms engage in corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2749-2769, July.
    12. Pablo Doucet & Pablo Garrido-Prada & Javier Parra-Domínguez & Ignacio Requejo & Isabel Suárez-González, 2025. "Circular economy practices in locally rooted family SMEs: the role of the socio-spatial context," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 2385-2406, December.
    13. Mª de la Cruz Déniz-Déniz & Mª Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez & Josefa D. Martín-Santana, 2020. "Orientation Toward Key Non-family Stakeholders and Economic Performance in Family Firms: The Role of Family Identification with the Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 329-345, May.
    14. Benjiang Ma & Yanlin Wang & Zhifang Zhou & Yu Lai & Zhongmin Zhou & Muhammad Farhan Bashir, 2022. "Can controlling family involvement promote firms to fulfill environmental responsibilities?—Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 569-592, March.
    15. Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Kraus, Sascha & Mahto, Raj V., 2022. "Marketing and family firms: Theoretical roots, research trajectories, and themes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 66-79.
    16. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christodoulides, Paul & Strømfeldt Eduardsen, Jonas, 2023. "A dynamic capabilities perspective to socially responsible family business: Implications on social-based advantage and market performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    17. Sanchez-Famoso, Valeriano & Cano-Rubio, Myriam & Fuentes-Lombardo, Guadalupe, 2025. "Relational capital’s contribution to international success: Evidence from family-owned wineries and olive oil mills in Spain," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Kinias, Ioannis & Chalis, Spyridon & Glyptis, Loukas, 2023. "Family business research: A systematic review and an uncelebrated role of marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2016. "Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Yali Zhao & Ran Zhou, 2025. "Clan Culture, Socioemotional Wealth and Family Business Social Responsibility," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(5), pages 653-670, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:1412-1443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.