IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v26y2010i1p64-82.html

Trade implications of price discrimination in a domestic market

Author

Listed:
  • Nobunori Kuga

    (Statistics Commission Office, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 3-1-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8970, Japan)

  • Nobuhiro Suzuki

    (Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan)

  • Harry M. Kaiser

    (Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, 349 Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-7801)

Abstract

This study examines how domestic price discrimination between fluid and manufacturing milk influences dairy trade. Two types of dairy models are used for the study. The first one is a stylized mathematical model which is used to explore the relative trade effects of domestic price discrimination accompanied with revenue pooling mechanism versus border measures in dairy product markets. The second one is a partial equilibrium, multiple-region model of dairy policy and trade, which is used to see the empirical implication of domestic price discrimination for six major dairy producers. The analytical results identify the trading status as the key to determine the relative trade effects. While domestic price discrimination is always less trade distorting than border measures in a net-importer case, the relative trade distortiveness depends on the export volume in a net exporter case. The theoretical possibility that domestic price discrimination is more trade distorting than border measures is found when the ratio of dairy export to domestic manufacturing milk consumption is very high. The results also indicate that while the both support measures increase dairy export, domestic price discrimination may place greater economic burden on fluid milk consumers and less economic burden on tax payers than border measures. In addition, the results imply that domestic price discrimination schemes can be effective trade protective measures for Canada, Japan and the United States, where the schemes are currently being implemented. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Nobunori Kuga & Nobuhiro Suzuki & Harry M. Kaiser, 2010. "Trade implications of price discrimination in a domestic market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 64-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:26:y:2010:i:1:p:64-82
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.20216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.20216
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.20216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsunemasa Kawaguchi & Nobuhiro Suzuki & Harry M. Kaiser, 2001. "Evaluating class I differentials in the new federal milk marketing order system," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 527-538.
    2. Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M. & Lenz, John E. & Forker, Olan D., 1994. "An Analysis Of U.S. Dairy Policy Deregulation Using An Imperfect Competition Model," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Thomas W. Hertel, 1989. "Negotiating Reductions in Agricultural Support: Implications of Technology and Factor Mobility," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 559-573.
    4. Nobuhiro Suzuki & John E. Lenz & Olan D. Forker, 1993. "A Conjectural Variations Model of Reduced Japanese Milk Price Supports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(1), pages 210-218.
    5. Bouamra-Mechemache, Z. & Chavas, J.P. & Cox, T. & Réquillart, V., 2001. "Price discrimination and EU dairy policy : an economic evaluation of policy options," Economics Working Paper Archive (Toulouse) 23, French Institute for Agronomy Research (INRA), Economics Laboratory in Toulouse (ESR Toulouse).
    6. Daniel A. Sumner, 1999. "Domestic Price Regulations and Trade Policy: Milk Marketing Orders in the United States," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 47(5), pages 5-16, December.
    7. Thomas L. Cox & Jean-Paul Chavas, 2001. "An Interregional Analysis of Price Discrimination and Domestic Policy Reform in the U.S. Dairy Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(1), pages 89-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byeong‐Il Ahn & Hyunok Lee, 2010. "An equilibrium displacement approach to oligopoly market analysis: an application to trade in the Korean infant formula market," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 101-109, March.
    2. Hayley H. Chouinard & David E. Davis & Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Jeffrey M. Perloff, 2010. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 59-76.
    3. Kuga, Nobunori & Vavra, Pavel & Anton, Jesus & Dewbre, Joe, 2003. "Trade And Welfare Effects Of Dairy Price Support Measures," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21951, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Soregaroli, Claudio & Sckokai, Paolo & Moro, Daniele, 2011. "Agricultural policy modelling under imperfect competition," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 195-212, March.
    5. Abbassi, Abdessalem & Larue, Bruno, 2011. "Trade liberalization and inter-provincial dumping in a spatial equilibrium model: the case of the Canadian dairy industry," MPRA Paper 30363, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Vavra, Pavel & Kuga, Nobunori & Anton, Jesus & Dewbre, Joe, 2003. "Trade Effects of Dairy Pricing Arrangements," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25862, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Gohin, Alexandre & Matthews, Alan, 2024. "Ensuring farm minimum prices: Economic impacts of trade vs competition policies," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    8. Guyomard, Herve & Lankoski, Jussi E. & Ollikainen, Markku, 2005. "Impacts of Agri-Environmental Policies on Land Allocation and Prices," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24466, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Lehtonen, Heikki, 2008. "Resolving the conflict between environmental damage and agricultural viability on less favoured areas," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44150, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M. & Lenz, John E. & Forker, Olan D., 1993. "Evaluating U.S. Generic Milk Advertising Effectiveness Using An Imperfect Competition Model," Research Bulletins 123015, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Doyon, Maurice & Novakovic, Andrew M., 1997. "An Application of Experimental Economics to Agricultural Policies: The Case of U.S. Dairy Deregulation on Farm-Level Markets," Research Bulletins 122807, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    12. Wyatt Thompson & Joe Dewbre & Patrick Westfhoff & Kateryna Schroeder & Simone Pieralli & Ignacio Perez Dominguez, 2017. "Introducing medium-and long-term productivity responses in Aglink-Cosimo," JRC Research Reports JRC105738, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Othman, Jamal, 1997. "Linking Factor Markets, Environment and Trade: The Case of Oil Palm in Malaysia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 31, pages 53-69.
    14. Jonasson, Erik & Filipski, Mateusz & Brooks, Jonathan & Taylor, J. Edward, 2014. "Modeling the welfare impacts of agricultural policies in developing countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 63-82.
    15. Ciaian, Pavel, & Kancs, d’Artis & Swinnen, Jo & Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, 2012. "Rental Market Regulations for Agricultural Land in EU Member States and Candidate Countries," Factor Markets Working Papers 117, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    16. Paul Feichtinger & Klaus Salhofer, 2016. "The Fischler Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Land Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(3), pages 411-432.
    17. Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, "undated". "Direct Payments and Land Rents: Evidence from New Member States," Working papers 157121, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    18. Othman, Jamal, 2003. "Linking Agricultural Trade, Land Demand and Environmental Externalities: Case of Oil Palm in South East Asia," MPRA Paper 22016, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Hess, Sebastian & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2007. "Assessing general and partial equilibrium simulations of Doha round outcomes using meta-analysis," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 67, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    20. Seyed Habibollah Mosavi, 2016. "Energy price reform and food markets: the case of bread supply chain in Iran," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 169-179, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:26:y:2010:i:1:p:64-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.