IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v43y2021i4p442-456n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Challenges of Social Responsibility Best Practise in Foodstuff Production and Distribution Chain: Focus on Cee Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Poláček Lukáš

    (1 Research staff member, Department of Business Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic . Phone No. +420545132625)

  • Vavřina Jan

    (2 Research assistant, Corresponding author, Department of Business Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Polák Josef

    (3 Research assistant, Department of Economics and Management, The College of Regional Development and Banking Institute - AMBIS, a.s., Czech Republic)

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility in the food production and distribution sector in Europe is currently mainly linked to the activities of food banks. Food banks in the current form provide their services free of charge, however, these activities are closely associated with support from public budgets and volunteering. Currently, there is a growing tendency to revise the current funding scheme and the overall provision of food banks´ activities, as well as the efficiency aspects of their operation. It is, therefore, necessary to identify the essential aspects of the social responsibility framework, in particular from the side of participating entities as donors to food banks. The new situation calls for a revision of food banks´ operation schemes, including supportive voluntary intentions within the business environment. Specifically, the importance of the social responsibility of business entities can be seen in their inclusive assistance in the recent global COVID-19 crisis. This article aims at the identification of financial aspects behind voluntary donations to food banks, using the exploratory approach, namely via identification of major differences between voluntary donors and the respective industry benchmark in the field of financial criteria, focusing on Central and Eastern European countries (CEE). It was employed a methodological approach for testing independent observed samples to compare selected financial performance indicators´ mean values, using a two-sample T-test for equal and non-equal variances. Subsequently, a dynamic decomposition of observed financial performance indicators is conducted for a revision of the existence of mutual correlations. Differently from the main areas of interest of identified previous research on food banks´ activities, our effort is focusing on business entities in the role of food banks´ stakeholders. Corporate micro-financial data of foodstuff donors in Central and Eastern European countries according to their accessible annual reports and lists of donors to foodbanks are employed. Authors thus point out, based on provided empirical evidence, a need for a more inclusive type of attitude to food banks´ operations from the foodstuff production and distribution chain and its participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Poláček Lukáš & Vavřina Jan & Polák Josef, 2021. "Current Challenges of Social Responsibility Best Practise in Foodstuff Production and Distribution Chain: Focus on Cee Countries," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 43(4), pages 442-456, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:43:y:2021:i:4:p:442-456:n:2
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2021.40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.40
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2021.40?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petrovici, D.A. & Gorton, M., 2005. "An evaluation of the importance of subsistence food production for assessments of poverty and policy targeting: Evidence from Romania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 205-223, April.
    2. Martin Caraher & Sinéad Furey, 2018. "The Economics of Emergency Food Aid Provision," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-78506-6, September.
    3. Thompson, C. & Smith, D. & Cummins, S., 2018. "Understanding the health and wellbeing challenges of the food banking system: A qualitative study of food bank users, providers and referrers in London," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 95-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina M Pollard & Sue Booth, 2019. "Food Insecurity and Hunger in Rich Countries—It Is Time for Action against Inequality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. repec:zbw:iamodp:109518 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Anca C. Farcas & Charis M. Galanakis & Carmen Socaciu & Oana L. Pop & Dorin Tibulca & Adriana Paucean & Mirela A. Jimborean & Melinda Fogarasi & Liana C. Salanta & Maria Tofana & Sonia A. Socaci, 2020. "Food Security during the Pandemic and the Importance of the Bioeconomy in the New Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Chuan Liao & Christopher Barrett & Karim-Aly Kassam, 2015. "Does Diversification Improve Livelihoods? Pastoral Households in Xinjiang, China," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(6), pages 1302-1330, November.
    5. Kathrin Happe & Hauke Schnicke & Christoph Sahrbacher & Konrad Kellermann, 2009. "Will They Stay or Will They Go? Simulating the Dynamics of Single‐Holder Farms in a Dualistic Farm Structure in Slovakia," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 497-511, December.
    6. Lorenzo Compagnucci & Alessio Cavicchi & Francesca Spigarelli & Lorenza Natali, 2018. "A multi-stakeholder attempt to address food waste: The case of Wellfood Action EU project," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(3), pages 503-528.
    7. Bell, Zoë & Scott, Steph & Visram, Shelina & Rankin, Judith & Bambra, Clare & Heslehurst, Nicola, 2022. "Experiences and perceptions of nutritional health and wellbeing amongst food insecure women in Europe: A qualitative meta-ethnography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    8. Danielle Gallegos & Mariana M. Chilton, 2019. "Re-Evaluating Expertise: Principles for Food and Nutrition Security Research, Advocacy and Solutions in High-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Sophia Davidova & Lena Fredriksson & Alastair Bailey, 2009. "Subsistence and semi‐subsistence farming in selected EU new member states," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(s1), pages 733-744, November.
    10. Nica-Avram, Georgiana & Harvey, John & Smith, Gavin & Smith, Andrew & Goulding, James, 2021. "Identifying food insecurity in food sharing networks via machine learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 469-484.
    11. Alison Daly & Christina M. Pollard & Deborah A. Kerr & Colin W. Binns & Martin Caraher & Michael Phillips, 2018. "Using Cross-Sectional Data to Identify and Quantify the Relative Importance of Factors Associated with and Leading to Food Insecurity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Emma Beacom & Sinéad Furey & Lynsey Hollywood & Paul Humphreys, 2022. "Food Insecurity Measurement: Stakeholder Comparisons of the EU-SILC and HFSSM Indicators and Considerations Towards the Usefulness of a Headline Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1021-1041, August.
    13. Ansoms, An & McKay, Andrew, 2010. "A quantitative analysis of poverty and livelihood profiles: The case of rural Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 584-598, December.
    14. Edge, Sara & Meyer, Samantha B., 2019. "Pursuing dignified food security through novel collaborative governance initiatives: Perceived benefits, tensions and lessons learned," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 77-85.
    15. Fritzsch, Jana & Möllers, Judith & Buchenrieder, Gertrud, 2011. "Employment diversification of farm households and structural change in the rural economy of the New Member States," IAMO Discussion Papers 134, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    16. Flora Douglas & Fiona MacKenzie & Ourega-Zoé Ejebu & Stephen Whybrow & Ada L. Garcia & Lynda McKenzie & Anne Ludbrook & Elizabeth Dowler, 2018. "“ A Lot of People Are Struggling Privately. They Don’t Know Where to Go or They’re Not Sure of What to Do ”: Frontline Service Provider Perspectives of the Nature of Household Food Insecurity in Scotl," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Parsons, Elizabeth & Kearney, Treasa & Surman, Emma & Cappellini, Benedetta & Moffat, Sue & Harman, Vicki & Scheurenbrand, Klara, 2021. "Who really cares? Introducing an ‘Ethics of Care’ to debates on transformative value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 794-804.
    18. Sue Booth & Christina Pollard & John Coveney & Ian Goodwin-Smith, 2018. "‘Sustainable’ Rather Than ‘Subsistence’ Food Assistance Solutions to Food Insecurity: South Australian Recipients’ Perspectives on Traditional and Social Enterprise Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Van den Broeck, Goedele & Maertens, Miet, 2017. "Moving Up or Moving Out? Insights into Rural Development and Poverty Reduction in Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 95-109.
    20. Ouma, Emily & Dione, Michel & Lule, Peter & Rosel, Kristina & Pezo, Danilo, 2013. "Characterization of smallholder pig production systems in Uganda: constraints and opportunities for engaging with market systems," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 160677, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    21. Helen Coulson & Paul Milbourne, 2021. "Food justice for all?: searching for the ‘justice multiple’ in UK food movements," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 43-58, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate finance; food banks; production and distribution chain; social responsibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:43:y:2021:i:4:p:442-456:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.