IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jecman/v45y2023i1p441-467n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of ICT in the co-production of social services

Author

Listed:
  • Kozak Anna

    (Department of Public Management, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Aim/purpose – The purpose of this article was to identify the information and communication technology (ICT) tools fostering the co-production of social services, acknowledging that the technological environment is an important contextual condition enhancing the development of co-production. Design/methodology/approach – The method used was systematic literature review (SLR). Findings – As a result of the review, the catalog of solutions and tools offered by information and communication technologies was presented. The results of the research carried out indicate that the co-production of social services is favored by the use of such ICT tools as mobile applications, crowdsourcing, open data, big data, real-time data collection and analysis, gamification, and social media. Research implications/limitations – The main implication of the research is the comprehensive catalog of ICT tools that can be used to facilitate social service co-production. ICT tools also favor the emergence of new forms of co-production; there-fore, the acquaintance of these tools can accelerate this process. The study is constrained by several limitations. The study is constrained by several limitations. First, applied methodology, which is qualitative, analyzes secondary data. Second, the co-production in the social services area includes many and various services, and ICT application and impact can differ by specific type of service. Originality/value/contribution – This paper contributes to research on the co-production of social services, particularly in terms of the use of new technologies in this process, in two ways. First, the development of the catalog of ICT tools favoring social service co-production. Their application fosters the involvement of contextual actors, increasing the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of social services. In this way, the social service co-production contributes to better addressing the citizens’ needs, increasing their quality of life and well-being, and unleashing their potential. Second, by taking the PSL perspective and situating factors favoring co-production within a service ecosystem framework, this paper draws attention to public value emerging from new relations, extensive dialogue, deliberation, common arrangements, and collaborative activity in virtual communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kozak Anna, 2023. "Application of ICT in the co-production of social services," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 45(1), pages 441-467, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:441-467:n:1
    DOI: 10.22367/jem.2023.45.17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2023.45.17
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22367/jem.2023.45.17?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    2. Reinout Kleinhans, 2017. "False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: the case of Dutch community enterprises," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(10), pages 1500-1518, November.
    3. Veiko Lember & Taco Brandsen & Piret Tõnurist, 2019. "The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1665-1686, November.
    4. John Alford, 2016. "Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending public service-dominant logic," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 673-691, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:182-201 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Aldona Fraczkiewicz-Wronka & Anna Kozak, 2021. "Facilitating Co-production in Health Promotion: Study of Senior Councils in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 182-201.
    3. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Jonathan Rösler & Tobias Söll & Louise Hancock & Thomas Friedli, 2021. "Value Co-Creation between Public Service Organizations and the Private Sector: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Vegas-Macias, Jordi, 2025. "Social contact and value co-creation practices. Tourist–resident encounters and urban cycling in Copenhagen," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Krystyna Mazurek-Lopacinska & Magdalena Sobocinska, 2021. "Social Media in Marketing Activities of Enterprises in the Light of the Analysis of Empirical Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 647-658.
    7. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4b:p:647-658 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Yuxiang Chris Zhao & Jingwen Lian & Yan Zhang & Shijie Song & Xinlin Yao, 2024. "Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 298-323, March.
    9. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    10. Eileen Fischer & Markus Giesler, 2023. "A rhizomatic reflection on market systems dynamics research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 196-199, December.
    11. da Silva, Agostinho & Almeida, Isabel, 2020. "Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Tommaso Elli & Alessandra Spagnoli & Valeria Maria Iannilli, 2024. "Mapping Service-Based Retailing to Improve Sustainability Practices in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Robert Ciuchita & Jonas Heller & Sarah Köcher & Sören Köcher & Thomas Leclercq & Karim Sidaoui & Susan Stead, 2023. "It is Really Not a Game: An Integrative Review of Gamification for Service Research," Post-Print hal-04133024, HAL.
    14. Xiaodong Bai, 2024. "Unveiling the Impact of Value Propositions on Value Creation in Chinese Health Service Enterprises: A Customer Participation Perspective," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 38(1), pages 1-17.
    15. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Michael K. Brady & Todd Arnold, 2017. "Organizational service strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 785-788, November.
    17. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Jia, Yibo & Su, Jingqin & Cui, Li & Wu, Lin & Hua Tan, Kim, 2023. "Platform business model innovation in the digitalization era: A “driver-process-result” perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Hoang, Nam-Phuong T. & Ma, Tianyi & Silverwood, Amy J. & Sanders, Matthew R., 2024. "Place-based approach to support children’s development towards sustainable development goals: A scoping review of current effort and future agenda," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Vincenzo Basile & Francesca Loia & Nunzia Capobianco & Roberto Vona, 2023. "An ecosystems perspective on the reconversion of offshore platforms: Towards a multi‐level governance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1615-1631, July.
    21. Sarker, Moniruzzaman & Mohd-Any, Amrul Asraf & Kamarulzaman, Yusniza, 2021. "Validating a consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) model in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    22. Simeng Li & Zhimin Liu & Chao Ye, 2022. "Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai’s Inner City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    co-production; public services; social services; public management; ICT;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:441-467:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.