IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/itmasc/v17y2014i1p39-44n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling-based Risk Analysis of a Small Enterprise/ Modelēšanā bāzēta mazā uzņēmuma risku analīze/ Анализ рисков малого предприятия на основе моделирования

Author

Listed:
  • Bendza Kristine

    (SIA “JUMS 1”)

  • Pecerska Jelena

    (Riga Technical University)

Abstract

Повышенное давление глобализации и быстрого технического прогресса в последние годы выдвинули управление и анализ рисков, играющих всё более важную роль в повестке дня руководителей, в центр внимания большинства предприятий. Несмотря на разнообразие источников информации, единого подхода к анализу рисков не существует, поскольку подход зависит от конкретного бизнеса, экономических, политических и других аспектов. Кроме того, в большей части публикаций рассматриваются только крупные предприятия. Данная статья рассматривает анализ рисков малого предприятия. Целью статьи является рассмотрение подхода к анализу рисков малого предприятия. В статье рассмотрены методы анализа рисков для конкретного предприятия. Практический анализ рисков предприятия включает в себя три основных этапа: на начальном - предварительном - этапе выполнен ABC анализ складских запасов предприятия, и запасы сгруппированы по степени их важности. На базе предварительного анализа предложен качественный и количественный подход к анализу рисков изучаемого предприятия. На втором этапе выполнен качественный анализ факторов риска с использованием комбинации методов полуструктурированного интервью и причинно-следственного анализа. В результате факторы риска идентифицированы и классифицированы. На этом же этапе использована таблица оценки рисков в сочетании с матрицей рисков для оценки рисков и формулирования мероприятий по предотвращению рисков и смягчению их последствий. На третьем этапе выполнен количественный анализ рисков предприятия. Количественный анализ позволил подтвердить зависимость уровня качества обслуживания от степени изменчивости спроса и предложить математическую модель для проведения исследований факторов риска предприятия. Анализ основан на результатах моделирования с применением метода Монте Карло в программе Microsoft Office Excel. Анализ рисков малого предприятия на основе статистического моделирования даёт представление о разработанном и реализованном подходе к идентификации чувствительных точек и недостатков бизнес-процесса.

Suggested Citation

  • Bendza Kristine & Pecerska Jelena, 2014. "Modeling-based Risk Analysis of a Small Enterprise/ Modelēšanā bāzēta mazā uzņēmuma risku analīze/ Анализ рисков малого предприятия на основе моделирования," Information Technology and Management Science, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 39-44, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:itmasc:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:39-44:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/itms-2014-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/itms-2014-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/itms-2014-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2004. "Risk Analysis in Theory and Practice," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780121706210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raushan Bokusheva & Lukáš Čechura & Subal C. Kumbhakar, 2023. "Estimating persistent and transient technical efficiency and their determinants in the presence of heterogeneity and endogeneity," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 450-472, June.
    2. Serra, Teresa & Zilberman, David & Goodwin, Barry K. & Featherstone, Allen M., 2005. "Effects of Decoupling on the Average and the Variability of Output," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24601, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Martina Bozzola & Robert Finger, 2021. "Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: evidence from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(3), pages 477-501.
    4. Kawasaki, Kentaro, 2010. "The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 1-18.
    5. Preston, Richard & Walters, Cory G., 2015. "Risk Management Properties of the 2014 Farm Bill," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 206435, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Muhammad Rizwan & Ping Qing & Abdul Saboor & Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Adnan Nazir, 2020. "Production Risk and Competency among Categorized Rice Peasants: Cross-Sectional Evidence from an Emerging Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Adhikari, Shyam & Knight, Thomas O. & Belasco, Eric J., 2012. "Evaluation of Crop Insurance Yield Guarantees and Producer Welfare with Upward-Trending Yields," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Boyer, Christopher M. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Larson, James A. & Tyler, Donald, 2017. "Investment Analysis of Long-term Cover Crops and Tillage Systems on Cotton Production," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258525, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Molla Alemayehu & Joost Beuving & Ruerd Ruben, 2019. "Disentangling Poor Smallholder Farmers’ Risk Preferences and Time Horizons: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Ethiopia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(3), pages 558-580, July.
    10. Mitter, Hermine & Schmid, Erwin, 2019. "Computing the economic value of climate information for water stress management exemplified by crop production in Austria," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 430-448.
    11. Lei, Kaixuan & Chang, Jianxia & Long, Ruihao & Wang, Yimin & Zhang, Hongxue, 2022. "Cascade hydropower station risk operation under the condition of inflow uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    12. Pengfei Liu & Lingling Hou & Dongqing Li & Shi Min & Yueying Mu, 2021. "Determinants of Livestock Insurance Demand: Experimental Evidence from Chinese Herders," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 430-451, June.
    13. Finger, Robert & Buchmann, Nina, 2015. "An ecological economic assessment of risk-reducing effects of species diversity in managed grasslands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 89-97.
    14. Sauer, Johannes & Finger, Robert, 2014. "Climate Risk Management Strategies in Agriculture – The Case of Flood Risk," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 172679, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Giorgia Rivieccio & Salvatore Di Falco & Giovanni De Luca & Fabian Capitanio, 2022. "Agricultural diversification, productivity, and food security across time and space," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(S1), pages 41-58, November.
    16. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    17. Linden McBride & Leah Bevis, 2019. "Working Paper 311 - Risk, Returns, and Welfare," Working Paper Series 2437, African Development Bank.
    18. Mitchell, Paul D. & Knight, Thomas O., 2008. "Economic Analysis of Supplemental Deductible Coverage as Recommended in the USDA's 2007 Farm Bill Proposal," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 117-131, April.
    19. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    20. Mitter, Hermine & Heumesser, Christine & Schmid, Erwin, 2014. "Modelling robust crop production portfolios to assess agricultural vulnerability to climate change," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182702, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:itmasc:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:39-44:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.