IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v22y2021i4p24-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation indicators in the context of narrative economics

Author

Listed:
  • Vyacheslav V. Volchik

    (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Elena V. Maslyukova

    (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Sophia A. Panteeva

    (Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

Abstract

The analysis of innovation systems is a demanding task, which needs to be tackled comprehensively. Their modelling provides an indication of the formal innovative performance while the narrative analysis helps to examine relevant judgments about the rules and institutions that are key to the development of innovations. The study of the complementarity and noncomplementarity of the conclusions obtained using both approaches is likely to contribute to a deeper understanding of the Russian innovation system functioning. The paper aims to analyse how the content and spread of the national innovation system narratives are interrelated with the modelling of the Russian innovation system and the most important indicators of its func tioning. Methodologically, the research takes advantage of the methodological synthesis of nar rative economics and original institutionalism. The research methods include narrative analysis, cointegration analysis of mutual influence between narratives and innovation indicators. The authors identify peculiar features of innovation systems’ modelling, analyse the texts, stories and other sources containing narratives about the Russian innovation system development, and based on this discover the relationship between the spread of certain narratives (the frequen cies of word groups “innovative technologies”, “technology development”, “innovation activities”, “technology implementation”, “scientific schools”, “innovation policy”, “science and technology”) and innovation indicators (share of innovative goods, works, services in the total volume of goods shipped, works performed, services provided; share of expenditure on innovation activi ties in the total volume of goods shipped, works performed, services provided). The analysis also shows cointegration between the frequency of search queries “use of patents” and innovation indicators “number of patent application” and “number of patents issued”. The authors point to a number of limitations related to the innovation system modelling. There are some typical limitations such as availability and reliability of statistical data, methodological heterogeneity of statistics, model specification, etc., as well as some specific ones including a broad, ambiguous definition of the national innovation system, differences in the approaches to defining princi pal determinants, innovations immeasurability, considerations of the system connections and economies of scale, etc. Thus, the findings confirm the need for a narrative study in order to achieve an in-depth understanding of complex economic processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Vyacheslav V. Volchik & Elena V. Maslyukova & Sophia A. Panteeva, 2022. "Innovation indicators in the context of narrative economics," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 24-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:22:y:2021:i:4:p:24-44
    DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-4-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jne.usue.ru/images/download/93/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jne.usue.ru/ru/2021/1064
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-4-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Archibugi, Daniele & Coco, Alberto, 2005. "Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 175-194, March.
    2. Robert J. Shiller, 2021. "The Godley-Tobin memorial lecture: Animal spirits and viral popular narratives," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Robert J. Shiller, 2017. "Narrative Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 967-1004, April.
    4. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 37-63, Springer.
    5. Shiller, Robert J., 2019. "Narratives about technology-induced job degradation then and now," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 477-488.
    6. Robert J. Shiller, 2019. "Narratives about Technology-Induced Job Degradations Then and Now," NBER Working Papers 25536, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Peiffer, Caryn & Armytage, Rosita, 2019. "Searching for success: A mixed methods approach to identifying and examining positive outliers in development outcomes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 97-107.
    8. Markey-Towler, Brendan, 2019. "Rules, perception and emotion: When do institutions determine behaviour?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 381-396, June.
    9. Robert J. Shiller, 2019. "Narratives About Technology-Induced Job Degradation Then and Now," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2168, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    10. Griliches, Zvi, 1998. "R&D and Productivity," National Bureau of Economic Research Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226308869, December.
    11. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin, 2008. "National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1417-1435, October.
    12. Nasierowski, W. & Arcelus, F. J., 2003. "On the efficiency of national innovation systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 215-234, September.
    13. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number gril98-1, March.
    14. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Introduction to "R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence"," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 1-14, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Collier, Paul, 2016. "The cultural foundations of economic failure: A conceptual toolkit," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 126(PB), pages 5-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Carbonero & Jeremy Davies & Ekkehard Ernst & Sayantan Ghosal & Leaza McSorley, 2021. "Anxiety, Expectations Stabilization and Intertemporal Markets: Theory, Evidence and Policy," Working Papers 2021_12, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    2. Balatsky, E., 2021. "Institutional reforms and human capital," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 103-124.
    3. Vyacheslav V. Volchik & Elena V. Maslyukova & Sophia A. Panteeva, 2022. "Evolution of the Russian innovation system: Narratives and the impact on economic growth," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 23(4), pages 6-25, January.
    4. Cassiman, Bruno & Perez-Castrillo, David & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2002. "Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 775-799, June.
    5. Soumyananda Dinda, 2018. "Production technology and carbon emission: long-run relation with short-run dynamics," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 106-121, January.
    6. Vyacheslav V. Volchik & Elena V. Fursa & Elena V. Maslyukova, 2021. "Public administration and development of the Russian innovation system," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(5), pages 32-49, November.
    7. Gun Jea Yu & Seung-Yoon Rhee, 2015. "Effect of R&D Collaboration with Research Organizations on Innovation: The Mediation Effect of Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Aldieri, Luigi & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2015. "R&D Migration: a cross-national analysis," MPRA Paper 62541, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Breul Moritz & Broekel Tom & Brachert Matthias, 2015. "Die Treiber der räumlichen Emergenz und Konzentration der Photovoltaik- Industrie in Deutschland," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 59(3), pages 133-150, December.
    10. Yang, Jingjing & Khalil, Sana, 2014. "Do innovation dimensions matter in China’s cross-regional income differences?," MPRA Paper 62140, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Sep 2014.
    11. Saeed Assani & Jianlin Jiang & Ahmad Assani & Feng Yang, 2019. "Most productive scale size of China's regional R&D value chain: A mixed structure network," Papers 1910.03805, arXiv.org.
    12. Georg Graetz, 2019. "Labor Demand in the Past, Present, and Future," European Economy - Discussion Papers 114, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    13. Francesco Di Comite & dArtis Kancs, 2015. "Macro-Economic Models for R&D and Innovation Policies," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2015-03, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Hagedoorn, John & Cloodt, Myriam, 2003. "Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1365-1379, September.
    15. Das, Gouranga Gopal & Marjit, Sugata & Kar, Mausumi, 2020. "The Impact of Immigration on Skills, Innovation and Wages: Education Matters more than where People Come from," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 557-582.
    16. Gouranga Gopal Das & Sugata Marjit, 2018. "Skill, Innovation and Wage Inequality: Can Immigrants be the Trump Card?," Discussion Papers Series 594, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    17. Xiangdong Liu & Guangxi Cao, 2021. "The Impact of Participation in PPP Projects on Total Factor Productivity of Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Graetz, Georg, 2020. "Technological change and the Swedish labor market," Working Paper Series 2020:19, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    19. Asa Romeo Asa & Harold Campbell & Johanna Pangeiko Nautwima, 2022. "A Critical Review of Organizing Knowledge Management for Innovation," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 7-15, January.
    20. Jakub Growiec & Peter McAdam & Jakub dup Muck, 2023. "R&D Capital and the Idea Production Function," Research Working Paper RWP 23-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic growth; national innovation system; innovations; narrative economics; Russian innovation system; cointegration analysis; economic policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:22:y:2021:i:4:p:24-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.