IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v25y2022i1p583-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the superstar firm hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Stiel
  • Alexander Schiersch

Abstract

Firms with superior productivity, labeled superstar firms, are argued to be the link between rising concentration and the fall of the aggregate labor share in the US. This analysis confirms that similar evidence is found within the European context: the market share and firm size increase, whereas the labor share decreases with productivity. One of the much discussed mechanisms behind this development is the spreading of fixed overhead labor costs: Highly productive firms gain market share, and can simultaneously spread fixed overhead labor costs over more output, thereby reducing their own labor share and the aggregated labor share of the industry. We show that this mechanism can be tested empirically. However, using German firm-level data, we do not find any empirical evidence of it. Our analysis contributes to the ongoing debate by removing one of the proposed mechanisms from the list of potential explanations for the rise of superstar firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Stiel & Alexander Schiersch, 2022. "Testing the superstar firm hypothesis," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 583-603, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:583-603
    DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2022.2029071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15140326.2022.2029071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15140326.2022.2029071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:25:y:2022:i:1:p:583-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.