Stock returns and inflation: a new test of competing hypotheses
In this paper, an unrestricted cointegrating VAR is employed to test the dynamic implications of three competing explanations of the negative stock return-inflation relationship. Test results are provided which make use of recent advances in testing for Granger-causality. One implication is that Granger-causality testing using the newly recommended procedures results in a different interpretation of the links between inflation and stock returns. It is also found that Geske and Roll's is the only theory with a dynamic structure that is not rejected by a sample of quarterly US data from 1960 to 1992, although results are not entirely inconsistent with Fama's proxy hypothesis. Only Benderly and Zwick's hypothesis is clearly rejected by the data. The results also provide stylized facts on the dynamics linkages among key macroeconomic variables.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 9 (1999)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:9:y:1999:i:6:p:567-581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.