IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v18y2011i12p1155-1158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberalization and efficiency in the European postal sector

Author

Listed:
  • Cipriano Quiros

Abstract

Market competition has been widely considered as one of the main determinants of business efficiency. This study evaluates this hypothesis for European postal operators. In particular, it takes advantage of the coexistence of various degrees of competition in national postal markets and the differences in regulations established among countries. For this purpose, a stochastic production frontier model is estimated, using a database of 17 European national postal operators. The results show that the degree of competition in domestic markets and the independence of national regulatory authorities are the main factors to explain the increase in efficiency in the postal sector. This reinforces the need for transposing the European regulatory framework into all national postal markets and opening them up to competition with no further delay.

Suggested Citation

  • Cipriano Quiros, 2011. "Liberalization and efficiency in the European postal sector," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(12), pages 1155-1158.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:18:y:2011:i:12:p:1155-1158
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2010.528350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/13504851.2010.528350&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tochkov, Kiril, 2015. "The efficiency of postal services in the age of market liberalization and the internet: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 35-42.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:18:y:2011:i:12:p:1155-1158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.