IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v34y2021i1d10.1007_s11213-019-09511-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apprehending and Embedding Customer Expectations in the Collaborative Development of Performance Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Rebekah Schulz

    (Community and Culture, Georges River Council)

  • Andrew Sense

    (University of Wollongong)

  • Matthew Pepper

    (University of Wollongong)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to detail a systematic and systemic approach to capturing and embedding multiple customers’ expectations into a framework which facilitates the development of mutually agreeable performance indicators for local government operations. This process and its components are exemplified through four case studies within local government agencies who sought to identify and understand diverse customer expectations in relation to performance indicators for their cultural precincts. It addresses a methodological gap in public administration knowledge concerning stakeholders’ contribution to performance indicator development, and it has not previously been identified in literature or attempted in practice. It is posited that this presented approach is sufficiently generic in its activities to have high adaptive utility in a range of local government performance measurement development contexts. At the same time, it seeks to effectively address the need for a systemic understanding that assimilates input from multiple constituencies and stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebekah Schulz & Andrew Sense & Matthew Pepper, 2021. "Apprehending and Embedding Customer Expectations in the Collaborative Development of Performance Indicators," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 71-90, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:34:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11213-019-09511-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-019-09511-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-019-09511-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-019-09511-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pope, Devin G., 2009. "Reacting to rankings: Evidence from "America's Best Hospitals"," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1154-1165, December.
    2. Yuen, T. & Park, A.N. & Seifer, S.D. & Payne-Sturges, D., 2015. "A systematic review of community engagement in the US environmental protection agency's extramural research solicitations: Implications for research funders," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(12), pages 44-52.
    3. Richard Greatbanks & Graham Elkin & Graham Manville, 2010. "The use and efficacy of anecdotal performance reporting in the third sector," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 571-585, July.
    4. Abbie Griffin & John R. Hauser, 1993. "The Voice of the Customer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27.
    5. Eric A. Scorsone, 2008. "New Development: What are the Challenges in Transferring Lean Thinking to Government?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 61-64, February.
    6. Anita Pansari & V. Kumar, 2017. "Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 294-311, May.
    7. Pettigrew, Andrew M., 1997. "What is a processual analysis?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 337-348, December.
    8. Simon Bell & Tessa Berg & Stephen Morse, 2016. "Rich Pictures: Sustainable Development and Stakeholders – The Benefits of Content Analysis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 136-148, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebekah Schulz & Andrew Sense & Matthew Pepper, 2021. "Combining Participative Action Research with an Adapted House of Quality Framework for the Stakeholder Development of Performance Indicators in Local Government," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 307-330, June.
    2. Robert M. Peterson & Avinash Malshe & Scott B. Friend & Howard Dover, 2021. "Sales enablement: conceptualizing and developing a dynamic capability," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 542-565, May.
    3. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    4. Gu, Yiquan & Rasch, Alexander & Wenzel, Tobias, 2022. "Consumer salience and quality provision in (un)regulated public service markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Laurent Bouton, 2011. "Good rankings are bad - Why reliable rankings can hurt consumers," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2011-002, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    6. Krystyna Mazurek-Lopacinska & Magdalena Sobocinska, 2021. "Social Media in Marketing Activities of Enterprises in the Light of the Analysis of Empirical Research Results," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 647-658.
    7. Ellen H.M. Moors & Rogier Donders, 2009. "Understanding consumer needs and preferences in new product development: the case of functional food innovations," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 09-03, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2009.
    8. Epstein, Andrew J., 2010. "Effects of report cards on referral patterns to cardiac surgeons," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 718-731, September.
    9. Nii Antiaye Addy & Arash Shaban-Nejad & David L. Buckeridge & Laurette Dubé, 2015. "An Innovative Approach to Addressing Childhood Obesity: A Knowledge-Based Infrastructure for Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Decision-Making in Quebec, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Florian Englmaier & Arno Schmöller & Till Stowasser, 2018. "Price Discontinuities in an Online Market for Used Cars," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2754-2766, June.
    11. van Wijk, R.A.J.L. & van den Bosch, F.A.J., 2000. "Transition Processes Towards Internal Networks," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2000-22-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    13. Veronika Belousova & Nikolay Chichkanov, 2016. "Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in Russia: 2014–2015 Crisis Aftermath," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 46-58.
    14. Engström, Per & Forsell, Eskil, 2018. "Demand effects of consumers’ stated and revealed preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 43-61.
    15. Prarawan Senachai & Puthipong Julagasigorn, 2024. "Retail mix instruments influencing customer perceived value and customer engagement: a conceptual framework and research agenda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. J-B Yang & D-L Xu & X Xie & A K Maddulapalli, 2011. "Multicriteria evidential reasoning decision modelling and analysis—prioritizing voices of customer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(9), pages 1638-1654, September.
    17. Qi, Ji (Miracle) & Wang, Sijun & Lindsey Hall, Kristina K., 2023. "Bridging employee engagement and customer engagement in a service context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    18. Daniel Avdic & Tugba Bueyuekdurmus & Giuseppe Moscelli & Adam Pilny & Ieva Sriubaite, 2018. "Subjective and objective quality reporting and choice of hospital: Evidence from maternal care services in Germany," CINCH Working Paper Series 1803, Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Competent in Competition and Health.
    19. Yuncong Li & Fang Wang & Sheng-hua Zhong, 2023. "A More Fine-Grained Aspect–Sentiment–Opinion Triplet Extraction Task," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Rather, Raouf Ahmad & Raisinghani, Manju & Gligor, David & Parrey, Shakir Hussain & Russo, Ivan & Bozkurt, Sıddık, 2023. "Examining tourist citizenship behaviors through affective, cognitive, behavioral engagement and reputation: Symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:34:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11213-019-09511-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.