IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v17y2025i4d10.1007_s12571-025-01557-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Illuminating the global maize trade network: structure, resilience and supply chain security

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Chen

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xin Shu

    (Southwest University
    Hanhong College, Southwest University)

  • Xiquan Zhao

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Hu Yu

    (Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

This study investigates the global maize trade network from 2000 to 2022, focusing on its structure, resilience, and supply chain dynamics to improve food security. The analysis reveals significant growth in global maize trade, with the network becoming increasingly complex and dense, leading to improved efficiency. However, overall network connectivity remains uncertain, exposing vulnerabilities within the system. The trade network has developed a hierarchical structure, with four major clusters—North America-Caribbean, South America, Europe, and East Asia—dominating global trade, signaling the emergence of a multipolar trade pattern. Over time, the network has expanded eastward, with trade flows becoming more geographically diversified. Key exporters such as the United States, Argentina, and Brazil form the network’s backbone, serving as critical hubs that facilitate the flow of maize across global markets. Additionally, gateway countries like Spain play a vital role in connecting regional clusters, enhancing the overall network’s connectivity. While the resilience of the maize trade network has improved, significant node polarization remains. Central exporters remain indispensable for the network’s stability, while peripheral regions remain more vulnerable. The study underscores the importance of strengthening connectivity between key players and regions to reduce vulnerabilities and enhance the resilience of the global maize trade network. Policy recommendations are provided to ensure the sustainability and stability of the global maize supply chain, ultimately supporting global food security in the face of growing demand and potential disruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Chen & Xin Shu & Xiquan Zhao & Hu Yu, 2025. "Illuminating the global maize trade network: structure, resilience and supply chain security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 17(4), pages 811-827, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:17:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s12571-025-01557-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-025-01557-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-025-01557-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-025-01557-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgio Fagiolo & Javier Reyes & Stefano Schiavo, 2010. "The evolution of the world trade web: a weighted-network analysis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 479-514, August.
    2. Giordani, Paolo E. & Rocha, Nadia & Ruta, Michele, 2016. "Food prices and the multiplier effect of trade policy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 102-122.
    3. Rebekka Burkholz & Frank Schweitzer, 2019. "International crop trade networks: The impact of shocks and cascades," Papers 1901.05872, arXiv.org.
    4. Zachary P Neal, 2022. "backbone: An R package to extract network backbones," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Mohamed Behnassi & Mahjoub El Haiba, 2022. "Implications of the Russia–Ukraine war for global food security," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 754-755, June.
    6. Headey, Derek, 2011. "Rethinking the global food crisis: The role of trade shocks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 136-146, April.
    7. Marie-Cécile Dupas & José Halloy & Petros Chatzimpiros, 2019. "Time dynamics and invariant subnetwork structures in the world cereals trade network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Felicia Wu & Hasan Guclu, 2013. "Global Maize Trade and Food Security: Implications from a Social Network Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(12), pages 2168-2178, December.
    9. Zhang, Yin-Ting & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2023. "Quantifying the status of economies in international crop trade networks: A correlation structure analysis of various node-ranking metrics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Stephen A. Wood & Matthew R. Smith & Jessica Fanzo & Roseline Remans & Ruth S. DeFries, 2018. "Trade and the equitability of global food nutrient distribution," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 34-37, January.
    11. Luciano Gutierrez, 2013. "Speculative bubbles in agricultural commodity markets-super- †," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(2), pages 217-238, March.
    12. I. Tzekina & K. Danthi & D. Rockmore, 2008. "Evolution of community structure in the world trade web," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 63(4), pages 541-545, June.
    13. Luciana L. Porfirio & David Newth & John J. Finnigan & Yiyong Cai, 2018. "Economic shifts in agricultural production and trade due to climate change," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, December.
    14. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    15. Dithmer, Jan & Abdulai, Awudu, 2017. "Does trade openness contribute to food security? A dynamic panel analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 218-230.
    16. Olaf Erenstein & Moti Jaleta & Kai Sonder & Khondoker Mottaleb & B.M. Prasanna, 2022. "Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1295-1319, October.
    17. Tiziano Distefano & Francesco Laio & Luca Ridolfi & Stefano Schiavo, 2018. "Shock transmission in the International Food Trade Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Maasdorp, Gavin, 1998. "Regional trade and food security in SADC1," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 505-518, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Marson & Donatella Saccone & Elena Vallino, 2023. "Total trade, cereals trade and undernourishment: new empirical evidence for developing countries," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(2), pages 299-332, May.
    2. Isaac Ketu & Stéphane Mbiankeu Nguea, 2024. "Globalization and the “zero hunger” goal in Africa: Starving in an open world?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(7), pages 2769-2789, October.
    3. Yacine Ouahioune, 2023. "Optimal Sub-Saharan and European trade policy response to the use of the food weapon by Russia: do regional taste variations count?," CSAE Working Paper Series 2023-08, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    4. Trucmel Irina-Maria & Vintila Alexandra, 2023. "An Assessment of the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict on the European Cereal Exports Using Network Theory," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 46-62, July.
    5. Raluca Georgiana Robu & Alina Petronela Alexoaei & Valentin Cojanu & Dumitru Miron, 2024. "The cereal network: a baseline approach to current configurations of trade communities," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Marco Grassia & Giuseppe Mangioni & Stefano Schiavo & Silvio Traverso, 2020. "(Unintended) Consequences of export restrictions on medical goods during the Covid-19 pandemic," Papers 2007.11941, arXiv.org.
    7. Kuhla, Kilian & Kubiczek, Patryk & Otto, Christian, 2025. "Understanding agricultural market dynamics in times of crisis: The dynamic agent-based network model Agrimate," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Traverso, Silvio & Schiavo, Stefano, 2020. "Fair trade or trade fair? International food trade and cross-border macronutrient flows," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Junwen Cao & Qingya Lei, 2025. "Global agricultural trade network characteristics and its influencing factors," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Marta Marson & Donatella Saccone, 2023. "Fed with import and starved by war: Estimating the consequences of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on cereals trade and global hunger," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 413-423, July.
    11. Moritz Laber & Peter Klimek & Martin Bruckner & Liuhuaying Yang & Stefan Thurner, 2022. "Shock propagation from the Russia-Ukraine conflict on international multilayer food production network determines global food availability," Papers 2210.01846, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    12. Kang, Xinyu & Wang, Minxi & Chen, Lu & Li, Xin, 2023. "Supply risk propagation of global copper industry chain based on multi-layer complex network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    13. Bradford, Scott C. & Negi, Digvijay Singh & Ramaswami, Bharat, 2022. "International risk sharing for food staples," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Nakelse, Tebila & Dalton, Timothy J. & Hendricks, Nathan P. & Hodjo, Manzamasso, 2018. "Are smallholder farmers better or worse off from an increase in the international price of cereals?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 213-223.
    15. Grant, Jason H. & Boys, Kathryn A. & Giddens, Janice C. & Loux, William, 2025. "Enhancing nutrition availability through international trade: U.S. and global dairy exports to emerging markets," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Hoffmann, Farina & Koellner, Thomas & Kastner, Thomas, 2021. "The micronutrient content of the European Union's agricultural trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Roberto Antonietti & Paolo Falbo & Fulvio Fontini & Rosanna Grassi & Giorgio Rizzini, 2021. "International Trade Network: Country centrality and COVID-19 pandemic," Papers 2107.14554, arXiv.org.
    18. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Jiang, Meihui & Sun, Xiaoqi, 2024. "Supply shock propagation in the multi-layer network of global steel product chain: Additive effect of trade and production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Qing Guan & Haizhong An & Xiaoqing Hao & Xiaoliang Jia, 2016. "The Impact of Countries’ Roles on the International Photovoltaic Trade Pattern: The Complex Networks Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Estrades, Carmen & Flores, Manuel & Lezama, Guillermo, "undated". "The Role of Export Restrictions in Agricultural Trade," Commissioned Papers 256421, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:17:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s12571-025-01557-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.