Author
Listed:
- Olga Blasco-Blasco
(Universitat de València)
- Pablo A. Pinto-Delacadena
(Universitat de València
Universidad Internacional del Ecuador)
- Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas
(Universidad de Las Américas)
- Vicente Liern
(Universitat de València)
Abstract
This article introduces an innovative questionnaire designed to assess key competencies in selection processes applicable across all organizational levels, including operational, tactical, and strategic. The questionnaire was developed using the Fuzzy Delphi Method, which integrates fuzzy logic to address the inherent ambiguity in consensus-building and decision-making processes. Fuzzy logic effectively manages uncertainty and subjectivity, optimizing the resources involved in selection procedures. This approach overcomes the limitations of traditional tools, offering a more objective and practical evaluation method. The instrument adapts the DISC and BFQ questionnaires to evaluate eight essential competencies, including decision-making, teamwork, and innovation. Its validation employed rigorous statistical techniques, such as Fleiss’ Kappa coefficient and Cronbach’s Alpha, confirming its reliability and internal consistency across 53 items. The practical implementation of this questionnaire in the selection process of an insurance company demonstrated its effectiveness, enabling quantitative classifications that align with organizational objectives while minimizing subjectivity. This questionnaire provides a scalable and resource-efficient solution that addresses the current demands of organizations, fostering equitable and evidence-based hiring decisions. The findings of this study establish a new standard in recruitment practices, significantly contributing to talent management and the optimization of selection processes.
Suggested Citation
Olga Blasco-Blasco & Pablo A. Pinto-Delacadena & Andrea Vinueza-Cabezas & Vicente Liern, 2025.
"Crafting a competency-based questionnaire based on Fuzzy Delphi: a proposal for enhanced hiring process,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3245-3269, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02086-x
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02086-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02086-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.