IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v48y2014i6p3327-3342.html

Specifying and assessing a formative measure for Hofstede’s cultural values: a Malaysian study

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Thien

  • Ramayah Thurasamy

  • Nordin Abd Razak

Abstract

The growing interest on Hofstede’s cultural values has dominated the area of management and organizational research. However, the extant literature with disappointing psychometric results have provoked a pressing need to re-examine its measurement model specification. To fill this gap, this study attempts to specify the epistemic nature of Hofstede’s cultural values and its underlying dimensions, and to assess a proposed second-order reflective–formative model for Hofstede’s cultural values at individual level in the school organizational context. The stratified sample consisted of 1,154 teachers selected from 30 Malaysian primary schools. The analysis was conducted using Partial Least Square analysis with SmartPLS 2.0 software program. Findings revealed the absence of multicollinearity with the convergent, nomological and discriminant validity were affirmed. This study has confirmed Hofstede’s cultural values as formative second-order hierarchical latent construct which are commonly operationalized by means of reflective dimensions would be better captured using a formative measure perspective by providing rigorous empirical evidence. Limitations and thoughts to stimulate future studies are discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Thien & Ramayah Thurasamy & Nordin Abd Razak, 2014. "Specifying and assessing a formative measure for Hofstede’s cultural values: a Malaysian study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3327-3342, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:3327-3342
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9959-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9959-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9959-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Riefler, Petra & Roth, Katharina P., 2008. "Advancing formative measurement models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1203-1218, December.
    2. Geert Hofstede, 1994. "Management Scientists Are Human," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 4-13, January.
    3. Shahriar Akter & John D'Ambra & Pradeep Ray, 2011. "Trustworthiness in mHealth information services: An assessment of a hierarchical model with mediating and moderating effects using partial least squares (PLS)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 100-116, January.
    4. Bradley L Kirkman & Kevin B Lowe & Cristina B Gibson, 2006. "A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(3), pages 285-320, May.
    5. Kenneth Bollen, 1984. "Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 377-385, August.
    6. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Muzahid Akbar & Walter Wymer, 2017. "Refining the conceptualization of Brand Authenticity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 14-32, January.
    2. Nick Lee & John W. Cadogan & Laura Chamberlain, 2013. "The MIMIC model and formative variables: problems and solutions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 3(1), pages 3-17, March.
    3. Rachita Kashyap & Ankit Kesharwani & Abhilash Ponnam, 2023. "Measurement of online review helpfulness: a formative measure development and validation," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2183-2216, December.
    4. Radosevic, Slavo & Yoruk, Esin, 2013. "Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1015-1038.
    5. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2010. "Reflective and formative metrics of relationship value: Response to Baxter's commentary essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 91-93, January.
    6. Blut, Markus, 2016. "E-Service Quality: Development of a Hierarchical Model," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 500-517.
    7. Anne Bartel-Radic & Jean-Luc Giannelloni, 2017. "A renewed perspective on the measurement of cross-cultural competence: An approach through personality traits and cross-cultural knowledge," Post-Print hal-01975656, HAL.
    8. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    9. Skiba, Florian & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2008. "Integration of innovative users as source of service innovations," Working Papers 54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    10. Panagopoulos, Nikolaos G. & Avlonitis, George J., 2010. "Performance implications of sales strategy: The moderating effects of leadership and environment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 46-57.
    11. Giulio Giacomo Cantone, 2024. "How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systemic design for the model of measurement," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(8), pages 4937-4982, August.
    12. Kanupriya Katyal & Vinay Kanetkar & Sanjay Patro, 2019. "What is a fair fare? Exploring the differences between perceived price fairness and perceived price unfairness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 133-146, April.
    13. Akhmadiyeva, Zarema & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2026. "Land rights perceptions and farmer behavior: Evidence from Central Asia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Dastane, Omkar & Goi, Chai Lee & Rabbanee, Fazlul, 2023. "The development and validation of a scale to measure perceived value of mobile commerce (MVAL-SCALE)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Minerva Martínez Avila & Juan José García-Machado & Eréndira Fierro Moreno, 2021. "A Multiple Full Mediating Effect in a PLS Hierarchical Component Model: Application to the Collaborative Public Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Cheng, Yang & Matthiesen, Rikke & Farooq, Sami & Johansen, John & Hu, Haibo & Ma, Lei, 2018. "The evolution of investment patterns on advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) in manufacturing operations: A longitudinal analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 239-253.
    17. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Tanja Dmitrović & Vesna Žabkar, 2010. "Assessing Tourism Supply Quality Using Formative Indicators: Implications for Destination Management," Tourism Economics, , vol. 16(2), pages 405-425, June.
    19. Raschke, Robyn L., 2010. "Process-based view of agility: The value contribution of IT and the effects on process outcomes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 297-313.
    20. Maurizio Carpita & Enrico Ciavolino & Mariangela Nitti, 2019. "The MIMIC–CUB Model for the Prediction of the Economic Public Opinions in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 287-305, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:48:y:2014:i:6:p:3327-3342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.