IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v38y2016i1d10.1007_s00291-015-0394-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A competitive solution for cooperative truckload delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Behzad Hezarkhani

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

  • Marco Slikker

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

  • Tom Woensel

    (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Abstract

This paper introduces a solution for gain sharing in consortia of logistic providers where joint planning of truckload deliveries enables the reduction of empty kilometers. The highly competitive nature of freight transport markets necessitates solutions that distinguish among the logistics providers based on their characteristics, even in situations with two players only. We introduce desirable properties in these situations and propose a solution that satisfies such properties. By comparing the existing solutions against the introduced properties we demonstrate the advantages of our proposed solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Behzad Hezarkhani & Marco Slikker & Tom Woensel, 2016. "A competitive solution for cooperative truckload delivery," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 51-80, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:38:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00291-015-0394-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-015-0394-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-015-0394-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-015-0394-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cruijssen, Frans & Cools, Martine & Dullaert, Wout, 2007. "Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 129-142, March.
    2. VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & VERCRUYSSE, Dries & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2013. "Analysis of different cost allocation methods in a collaborative transport setting," Working Papers 2013009, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    3. Granot, D. & Hamers, H.J.M. & Tijs, S.H., 1999. "On some balanced, totally balanced and submodular delivery games," Other publications TiSEM e0496604-0162-4a27-992c-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Hamers, Herbert, 1997. "On the concavity of delivery games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 445-458, June.
    5. K. Michael Ortmann, 2000. "The proportional value for positive cooperative games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 51(2), pages 235-248, April.
    6. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Hamers, Herbert & Borm, Peter & van de Leensel, Robert & Tijs, Stef, 1999. "Cost allocation in the Chinese postman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 153-163, October.
    8. Aumann, Robert J. & Maschler, Michael, 1985. "Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-213, August.
    9. Tijs, S.H. & Driessen, T.S.H., 1986. "Game theory and cost allocation problems," Other publications TiSEM 376c24c5-c95d-4d29-96b6-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. M. Maschler & B. Peleg & L. S. Shapley, 1979. "Geometric Properties of the Kernel, Nucleolus, and Related Solution Concepts," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 303-338, November.
    11. S. H. Tijs & T. S. H. Driessen, 1986. "Game Theory and Cost Allocation Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(8), pages 1015-1028, August.
    12. Trine Platz & Herbert Hamers, 2015. "On games arising from multi-depot Chinese postman problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 675-692, December.
    13. Imma Curiel, 2008. "Cooperative Combinatorial Games," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Altannar Chinchuluun & Panos M. Pardalos & Athanasios Migdalas & Leonidas Pitsoulis (ed.), Pareto Optimality, Game Theory And Equilibria, pages 131-157, Springer.
    14. Frisk, M. & Göthe-Lundgren, M. & Jörnsten, K. & Rönnqvist, M., 2010. "Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 448-458, September.
    15. Okan Örsan Özener & Özlem Ergun, 2008. "Allocating Costs in a Collaborative Transportation Procurement Network," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 146-165, May.
    16. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    17. Drechsel, J. & Kimms, A., 2010. "Computing core allocations in cooperative games with an application to cooperative procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 310-321, November.
    18. Stefan Engevall & Maud Göthe-Lundgren & Peter Värbrand, 2004. "The Heterogeneous Vehicle-Routing Game," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 71-85, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loe Schlicher & Marco Slikker & Geert-Jan Houtum, 2018. "Pooling of critical, low-utilization resources with unavailability," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 233-263, January.
    2. Schlicher, Loe & Lurkin, Virginie, 2022. "Stable allocations for choice-based collaborative price setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1242-1254.
    3. Lai, Minghui & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Hu, Qian, 2017. "An iterative auction for carrier collaboration in truckload pickup and delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 60-80.
    4. Julio Montecinos & Mustapha Ouhimmou & Satyaveer Chauhan & Marc Paquet & Ali Gharbi, 2021. "Transport carriers’ cooperation on the last-mile delivery in urban areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2401-2431, October.
    5. Soriano, Adria & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2023. "The multi-depot vehicle routing problem with profit fairness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Rasulkhani, Saeid & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2019. "Route-cost-assignment with joint user and operator behavior as a many-to-one stable matching assignment game," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 60-81.
    7. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    8. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2021. "The collaborative consistent vehicle routing problem with workload balance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 955-965.
    9. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Slikker, Marco & Van Woensel, Tom, 2019. "Gain-sharing in urban consolidation centers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 380-392.
    10. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    11. Alf Kimms & Herbert Kopfer, 2016. "Collaborative planning in transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 1-2, January.
    12. Soriano, Adria & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2022. "Reprint of: The multi-depot vehicle routing problem with profit fairness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    13. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2018. "Multi-objective optimisation models for the travelling salesman problem with horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 891-903.
    14. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    15. Martin Savelsbergh & Tom Van Woensel, 2016. "50th Anniversary Invited Article—City Logistics: Challenges and Opportunities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 579-590, May.
    16. Alix Vargas & Shushma Patel & Dilip Patel, 2018. "Towards a Business Model Framework to Increase Collaboration in the Freight Industry," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-32, October.
    17. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth & Dullaert, Wout, 2019. "Integrating partner objectives in horizontal logistics optimisation models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl & Sarah Wieser, 2021. "Assignment constraints in shared transportation services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 513-539, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kellner, Florian & Schneiderbauer, Miriam, 2019. "Further insights into the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions to shipments in road freight transportation: The pollution routing game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 296-313.
    2. Basso, Franco & Guajardo, Mario & Varas, Mauricio, 2020. "Collaborative job scheduling in the wine bottling process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Kimms, A. & Kozeletskyi, I., 2016. "Core-based cost allocation in the cooperative traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 910-916.
    4. M. Fiestras-Janeiro & Ignacio García-Jurado & Manuel Mosquera, 2011. "Cooperative games and cost allocation problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    6. DEFRYN, Christof & VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & VAN BREEDAM, Alex & VANNIEUWENHUYSE, Bart & VERSTREPEN, Sven, 2014. "Gain sharing in horizontal logistic collaboration. A case study in the fresh fruit and vegetables sector," Working Papers 2014004, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    7. Christoph Weissbart, 2018. "Decarbonization of Power Markets under Stability and Fairness: Do They Influence Efficiency?," ifo Working Paper Series 270, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    8. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Slikker, Marco & Van Woensel, Tom, 2019. "Gain-sharing in urban consolidation centers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 380-392.
    9. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Grigoriev, Alexander & Jung, Verena & Peeters - Rutten, Marianne & Vredeveld, Tjark, 2017. "On the Acceptance of Gain Sharing Methods in Supply Chain Collaboration," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    11. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    12. DEFRYN, Christof & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & CORNELISSENS, Trijntje, 2015. "The selective vehicle routing problem in a collaborative environment," Working Papers 2015006, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    13. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    14. Lozano, S., 2012. "Information sharing in DEA: A cooperative game theory approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 558-565.
    15. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth & Cornelissens, Trijntje, 2016. "The selective vehicle routing problem in a collaborative environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 400-411.
    16. Skovsgaard, Lise & Jensen, Ida Græsted, 2018. "Recent trends in biogas value chains explained using cooperative game theory," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 503-522.
    17. Jun Li & Xiaoqiang Cai & Yinlian Zeng, 2016. "Cost allocation for less-than-truckload collaboration among perishable product retailers," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 81-117, January.
    18. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    19. Minyoung Yea & Seokhyun Chung & Taesu Cheong & Daeki Kim, 2018. "The Sharing of Benefits from a Logistics Alliance Based on a Hub-Spoke Network: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:38:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00291-015-0394-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.