Author
Listed:
- T Thasni
(Indian Institute of Management Kashipur)
- Kausik Gangopadhyay
(Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)
- Debasis Mondal
(Indian Institute of Technology Delhi)
Abstract
In this paper, we present the substantial disparities in sectoral labour productivity across Indian states from 1983 to 2017. We decompose the change in aggregate labour productivity into two components - ‘within sector’ and ‘reallocation’ - utilizing a three sector disaggregation. Reallocation, or structural transformation, contributes modestly to productivity changes for all states except Punjab. Productivity growth in agriculture and manufacturing sectors is nearly identical, while growth in services consistently outpaces both. Regarding the contribution of different sectors to aggregate productivity growth, agriculture remains the primary contributor in four states, whereas growth within the tertiary sector dominates in other 10 states. Gujarat stands out as the only state where manufacturing contributes the most to its aggregate productivity growth, underscoring the stagnancy of manufacturing in the growth dynamics of the remaining states. The variance in productivity across states is most pronounced in agriculture, with no indication of these sectoral productivity variances diminishing over time. States that exhibited the highest level of agricultural productivity in 1983 (Punjab, Gujarat, Kerala, Haryana) witnessed the greatest decline in its agricultural labour share over the subsequent 35 years. However, the structural change component in their productivity change is not notably high. This signifies the prominent role of ‘within sector’ productivity change, accounting for approximately 81% of overall productivity growth of states.
Suggested Citation
T Thasni & Kausik Gangopadhyay & Debasis Mondal, 2025.
"Analyzing the Impact of Structural Change on Aggregate Productivity in Indian States: A Three Sector Study,"
Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 23(3), pages 899-923, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jqecon:v:23:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40953-025-00452-y
DOI: 10.1007/s40953-025-00452-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jqecon:v:23:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s40953-025-00452-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.