IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v13y2024i1d10.1186_s13731-023-00360-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The RRI Citizen Review Panel: a public engagement method for supporting responsible territorial policymaking

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Vestergaard Bidstrup

    (Danish Board of Technology)

  • Snezhina Gabova

    (Sofia Development Association)

  • Pavlos Kilintzis

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Elpida Samara

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Amalia Kouskoura

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Yiannis Bakouros

    (University of Western Macedonia)

  • Florian Roth

    (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Responsible Territorial Policymaking incorporates the main principles of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) into the policymaking process, making it well-suited for guiding the development of sustainable and resilient territorial policies that prioritise societal needs. As a cornerstone in RRI, public engagement plays a central role in this process, underscoring the importance of involving all societal actors to align outcomes with the needs, expectations, and values of society. In the absence of existing methods to gather sufficiently and effectively the citizens’ review of multiple policies at a territorial level, the RRI Citizen Review Panel is a new public engagement method developed to facilitate citizens’ review and validation of territorial policies. By using RRI as an analytical framework, this paper examines whether the RRI Citizen Review Panel can support Responsible Territorial Policymaking, not only by incorporating citizens’ perspectives into territorial policymaking, but also by making policies more responsible. The paper demonstrates that in the review of territorial policies, citizens are adding elements of RRI to a wide range of policies within different policy areas, contributing to making policies more responsible. Consequently, the RRI Citizen Review Panel emerges as a valuable tool for policymakers, enabling them to gather citizen perspectives and imbue policies with a heightened sense of responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Vestergaard Bidstrup & Snezhina Gabova & Pavlos Kilintzis & Elpida Samara & Amalia Kouskoura & Yiannis Bakouros & Florian Roth, 2024. "The RRI Citizen Review Panel: a public engagement method for supporting responsible territorial policymaking," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:13:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-023-00360-6
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-023-00360-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-023-00360-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-023-00360-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 2001. "Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 198-213, April.
    2. Russell J. Dalton, 2008. "Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 76-98, March.
    3. Street, Jackie & Duszynski, Katherine & Krawczyk, Stephanie & Braunack-Mayer, Annette, 2014. "The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Alice Panciroli & Angela Santangelo & Simona Tondelli, 2020. "Mapping RRI Dimensions and Sustainability into Regional Development Policies and Urban Planning Instruments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Mamman, Aminu & Bawole, Justice & Agbebi, Motolani & Alhassan, Abdul-Razak, 2019. "SME policy formulation and implementation in Africa: Unpacking assumptions as opportunity for research direction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 304-315.
    6. Carolyn Hendriks, 2005. "Participatory storylines and their influence on deliberative forums," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 38(1), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Gama, Fábio & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Frishammar, Johan & Wincent, Joakim, 2022. "Exploratory and exploitative capability paths for innovation: A contingency framework for harnessing fuzziness in the front end," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Graham Smith & Corinne Wales, 2000. "Citizens' Juries and Deliberative Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 48(1), pages 51-65, March.
    9. Russell J. Dalton, 2008. "Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 76-98, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Oser & Marc Hooghe & Zsuzsa Bakk & Roberto Mari, 2023. "Changing citizenship norms among adolescents, 1999-2009-2016: A two-step latent class approach with measurement equivalence testing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4915-4933, October.
    2. An, Youngeun & Lee, Youngsun & Oh, Soon-young & Lee, Jeong Youn, 2024. "How can young adults be civically engaged? The role of academic achievement standards in enhancing civic and social engagement in the case of South Korea," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Gugushvili, Alexi, 2024. "Perceptions of the Consequences of War in Ukraine: Exploring a Russian Paradox," SocArXiv y8rzh, Center for Open Science.
    4. Piatak Jaclyn, 2023. "Do Sociocultural Factors Drive Civic Engagement? An Examination of Political Interest and Religious Attendance," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 185-204, April.
    5. Sofie Marien & Marc Hooghe & Ellen Quintelier, 2010. "Inequalities in Non‐institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi‐level Analysis of 25 countries," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(1), pages 187-213, February.
    6. Li, Xuan, 2020. "The critical assessment of the youth policy and youth civic engagement in Denmark and three Danish municipalities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Simon Briole & Marc Gurgand & Eric Maurin & Sandra McNally & Jenifer Ruiz-Valenzuela & Daniel Santin, 2022. "The making of civic virtues: a school-based experiment in three countries," CEP Discussion Papers dp1830, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    8. Degeling, Chris & Rychetnik, Lucie & Street, Jackie & Thomas, Rae & Carter, Stacy M., 2017. "Influencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 166-171.
    9. Cato Waeterloos & Peter Conradie & Michel Walrave & Koen Ponnet, 2021. "Digital Issue Movements: Political Repertoires and Drivers of Participation among Belgian Youth in the Context of ‘School Strike for Climate’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Ramos Javier & Padilla Javier & Chueca Enrique, 2019. "Abstentionism, Voting Advice Applications and Voting Activation," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 55-85, June.
    11. Quinton Mayne & Brigitte Geißel, 2018. "Don’t Good Democracies Need “Good” Citizens? Citizen Dispositions and the Study of Democratic Quality," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 33-47.
    12. Yingying Sun & Yue Zhang, 2019. "Who Is Happier in China? Exploring Determinant Factors Using Religion as a Moderator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2022. "Does Political Participation Strengthen the Relationship between Civic Morality and Environmentally Friendly Attitudes? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Carolyn Barber & Jessica Ross, 2018. "Cross-Cohort Changes in Adolescents’ Civic Attitudes from 1999 to 2009: An Analysis of Sixteen Countries," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(2), pages 681-703, April.
    15. Michele Micheletti & Dietlind Stolle, 2012. "Sustainable Citizenship and the New Politics of Consumption," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 644(1), pages 88-120, November.
    16. Şehide Kilinc, 2025. "Research Trends on Political Participation of School Aged Children and Adolescents: Bibliometric Mapping and Content Analysis," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(2), pages 753-787, April.
    17. Yeshwork Gizaw Zewdie & Demis Alamirew Getahun & Yitayal Alemu Mengistu & Sefinew Alemu Mekonnen & Missaye Mulatie Mengstie, 2024. "Explaining motivational factors of employees’ behavior towards customers’ satisfaction using the theory of planned behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Livia Elisa Ortensi & Veronica Riniolo, 2020. "Do Migrants Get Involved in Politics? Levels, Forms and Drivers of Migrant Political Participation in Italy," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 133-153, March.
    19. Wen-Chun Chang, 2018. "Media Use and Satisfaction with Democracy: Testing the Role of Political Interest," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 999-1016, December.
    20. Plamen Mirazchiyski & Daniel Caro & Andrés Sandoval-Hernández, 2014. "Youth Future Civic Participation in Europe: Differences Between the East and the Rest," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 1031-1055, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:13:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-023-00360-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.