IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v16y2025i8d10.1007_s13198-025-02826-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent advancements of classical and metaheuristic techniques in ration feed optimization for livestock, poultry, and aquaculture: a review

Author

Listed:
  • Rajeev Das

    (Chandigarh University)

  • Sukriti Patty

    (National Institute of Technology)

  • Debashish Das

    (Birmingham City University)

  • Kedar Nath Das

    (National Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Optimizing animal feed rations is crucial for enhancing farm profitability, animal health, and production efficiency. Earlier review studies lacked a focus on feed optimization across diverse animal types, including farm animals, poultry, and aquaculture. To address this gap, this literature review examines prominent publications from the past four decades, sourced from multiple electronic databases. The study explores the application of classical techniques, primarily linear programming, and metaheuristic algorithms for ration formulation. Strengths, limitations, and suitability of these methods are analysed, along with emerging trends such as single/multi-objective optimization (considering factors beyond cost, like animal welfare and environmental impact) and species-specific models. Additionally, the integration of machine learning with optimization techniques is reviewed. The study highlights the evolution of these approaches and associated challenges, providing insights into future research directions for improving feed efficiency by balancing economic viability, animal health, and environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajeev Das & Sukriti Patty & Debashish Das & Kedar Nath Das, 2025. "Recent advancements of classical and metaheuristic techniques in ration feed optimization for livestock, poultry, and aquaculture: a review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(8), pages 2646-2669, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02826-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-025-02826-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-025-02826-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-025-02826-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F Polimeno & T Rehman & H Neal & C M Yates, 1999. "Integrating the use of linear and dynamic programming methods for dairy cow diet formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(9), pages 931-942, September.
    2. Cadenas, Jose M. & Pelta, David A. & Pelta, Hector R. & Verdegay, Jose L., 2004. "Application of fuzzy optimization to diet problems in Argentinean farms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 218-228, October.
    3. J. Žgajnar & L. Juvančič & S. Kavčič, 2009. "Combination of linear and weighted goal programming with penalty function in optimisation of a daily dairy cow ration," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(10), pages 492-500.
    4. Cai-Juan Soong & Rosshairy Abd Rahman & Razamin Ramli & Mohammed Suhaimee Abd Manaf & Chek-Choon Ting & Mojtaba Ahmadieh Khanesar, 2022. "An Evolutionary Algorithm: An Enhancement of Binary Tournament Selection for Fish Feed Formulation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-15, November.
    5. Tozer, P. R. & Stokes, J. R., 2001. "A multi-objective programming approach to feed ration balancing and nutrient management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 201-215, March.
    6. Othman Alqaisi & Oghaiki Asaah Ndambi & Ryan Blake Williams, 2017. "Time series livestock diet optimization: cost-effective broiler feed substitution using the commodity price spread approach," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Castrodeza, Carmen & Lara, Pablo & Pena, Teresa, 2005. "Multicriteria fractional model for feed formulation: economic, nutritional and environmental criteria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 76-96, October.
    8. Oluwadare Samuel Adebayo & Gabriel Arome Junior & Ogunrinde Oluwakemi Grace, 2019. "Tabu-Genetic Algorithm-Based Model for Poultry Feed Formulation," International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(2), pages 94-109.
    9. Qusay Mohammed Abdulateef & Syariza Abdul-Rahman & Hazem Sabri Abedalhammed, 2024. "Cyprinus carpio feed cost optimisation using the linear programming technique: a case study in Iraq," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(3), pages 377-392.
    10. Simon Mardle & Sean Pascoe, 1999. "An overview of genetic algorithms for the solution of optimisation problems," Computers in Higher Education Economics Review, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 13(1), pages 16-20.
    11. Rosshairy Abd. Rahman & Graham Kendall & Razamin Ramli & Zainoddin Jamari & Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud, 2017. "Shrimp Feed Formulation via Evolutionary Algorithm with Power Heuristics for Handling Constraints," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, November.
    12. T Peña & P Lara & C Castrodeza, 2009. "Multiobjective stochastic programming for feed formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1738-1748, December.
    13. Rosshairy Abd Rahman & Razamin Ramli & Zainoddin Jamari & Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud, 2016. "Evolutionary Algorithm with Roulette-Tournament Selection for Solving Aquaculture Diet Formulation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-10, June.
    14. Oluwadare Samuel Adebayo & Gabriel Arome Junior & Ogunrinde Oluwakemi Grace, 2019. "Tabu-Genetic Algorithm-Based Model for Poultry Feed Formulation," International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(2), pages 94-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosshairy Abd. Rahman & Graham Kendall & Razamin Ramli & Zainoddin Jamari & Ku Ruhana Ku-Mahamud, 2017. "Shrimp Feed Formulation via Evolutionary Algorithm with Power Heuristics for Handling Constraints," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, November.
    2. François Dubeau & Pierre-Olivier Julien & Candido Pomar, 2011. "Formulating diets for growing pigs: economic and environmental considerations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 239-269, October.
    3. De Matteis, Maria C. & Yu, T. Edward & Boyer, Christopher N. & DeLong, Karen L. & Smith, Jason, 2018. "Economic and environmental implications of incorporating distillers’ dried grains with solubles in feed rations of growing and finishing swine in Argentina," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    4. Lim, Teng & Massey, Ray & McCann, Laura & Canter, Timothy & Omura, Seabrook & Willett, Cammy & Roach, Alice & Key, Nigel & Dodson, Laura, "undated". "Increasing the Value of Manure for Farmers," USDA Miscellaneous 333552, United States Department of Agriculture.
    5. Babic, Zoran & Peric, Tunjo, 2011. "Optimization of livestock feed blend by use of goal programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 218-223, April.
    6. Buisman, Marjolein E. & Haijema, Rene & Akkerman, Renzo & Bloemhof, Jacqueline M., 2019. "Donation management for menu planning at soup kitchens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 324-338.
    7. Monde Rapiya & Mthunzi Mndela & Wayne Truter & Abel Ramoelo, 2025. "Assessing the Economic Viability of Sustainable Pasture and Rangeland Management Practices: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    8. T Peña & P Lara & C Castrodeza, 2009. "Multiobjective stochastic programming for feed formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1738-1748, December.
    9. Weiqin Ying & Bin Wu & Yu Wu & Yali Deng & Hainan Huang & Zhenyu Wang, 2019. "Efficient Conical Area Differential Evolution with Biased Decomposition and Dual Populations for Constrained Optimization," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, February.
    10. White, Robin R., 2016. "Increasing energy and protein use efficiency improves opportunities to decrease land use, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 20-29.
    11. White, Robin R. & Brady, Michael, 2014. "Can consumers’ willingness to pay incentivize adoption of environmental impact reducing technologies in meat animal production?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 41-49.
    12. Mohammed K. Ibrahim & Umi Kalsom Yusof & Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil Eisa & Maged Nasser, 2023. "Enhanced Genetic Method for Optimizing Multiple Sequence Alignment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    13. White, Robin R. & Brady, Michael & Capper, Judith L. & Johnson, Kristen A., 2014. "Optimizing diet and pasture management to improve sustainability of U.S. beef production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Luhandjula, M.K. & Joubert, J.W., 2010. "On some optimisation models in a fuzzy-stochastic environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1433-1441, December.
    15. Danijel Mijić & Grujica Vico & Božidar Popović & Nataša Popović & Miloš Ljubojević & Mihajlo Savić, 2024. "OPTIMILK: A Web-Based Tool for Least-Cost Dairy Ration Optimization Using Linear Programming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Niu, Geng & Zheng, Yi & Han, Feng & Qin, Huapeng, 2019. "The nexus of water, ecosystems and agriculture in arid areas: A multiobjective optimization study on system efficiencies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Yan Liu & Yongjiu Feng & Robert Gilmore Pontius, 2014. "Spatially-Explicit Simulation of Urban Growth through Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm and Cellular Automata Modelling," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Ahmad Al Eissa & Peng Chen & Paul B. Brown & Jen‐Yi Huang, 2022. "Effects of feed formula and farming system on the environmental performance of shrimp production chain from a life cycle perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2006-2019, December.
    19. Murtaza, Bilal & Ling-ling, Guo & Wang, Lili & Li, Xiaoyu & Ali, Ashiq & Saleemi, Muhammad Kashif & Khatoon, Aisha & Haq, Shahbaz Ul & Jin, Bowen & Li, Ji-bin & Xu, Yongping, 2025. "Mycotoxin detection in corn and distillers dried grains for food security," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. S Mutua & B Bebe & A Kahi & A Guliye, 2013. "Incorporation of Milk Yield, Dry Matter Intake and Phosphorous Excretion Predictive Functions in the Development of a Multi-Objective Dairy Feed Formulation Software Program," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(11), pages 208-208, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:16:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s13198-025-02826-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.