IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijogbc/v18y2023i2d10.1007_s42943-023-00083-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Adoption Barriers to Industry 4.0 Technologies in Farmer Producer Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • C. Ganeshkumar

    (Indian Institute of Plantation Management)

  • Nitish Kumar Singh

    (CHRIST (Deemed to be University))

  • Rahul S. Mor

    (University of Northampton)

  • Anupama Panghal

    (National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management)

Abstract

Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) are collectives formed by farmers, typically small and marginal farmers, intending to improve their economic and social conditions. This study explores the adoption barriers to Industry 4.0 technologies in FPOs and establishes the interrelationships between adoption variables for sustainable growth and income support. Twenty-eight barriers were identified after a literature review, and expert opinions were further scrutinized into five themes. The interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach was applied to explore inter-relationships between the barrier variables for industry 4.0 technology in FPO. Matrice d’Impacts Croises-multiplication Applique’ and Classement (MICMAC) analysis has been executed to classify the barriers according to their dependence and driving power. Out of the identified 28 barriers, five hinder FPO's adoption to Industry 4.0 technologies, and the financial barrier is the most significant barrier that leads to the highest driving power. Thus, this study offers a roadmap for FPOs and policymakers to support farmers towards start-ups, and a focused approach to eradicate the financial barriers will boost Industry 4.0 adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Ganeshkumar & Nitish Kumar Singh & Rahul S. Mor & Anupama Panghal, 2023. "Investigating the Adoption Barriers to Industry 4.0 Technologies in Farmer Producer Organisations," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 162-174, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:18:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s42943-023-00083-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s42943-023-00083-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42943-023-00083-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42943-023-00083-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thyagarajan Siddhartha & Thangasamy Nambirajan & Chandirasekaran Ganeshkumar, 2019. "Production and retailing of self help group products," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(6), pages 814-835.
    2. K. K. Tripathy & Manisha Paliwal & Nishita Nistala, 2021. "Good Governance Practices and Competitiveness in Cooperatives: An Analytical Study of Kerala Primary Agricultural Credit Societies," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 153-161, December.
    3. Sumanta Das & Akhilesh Barve & Naresh Chandra Sahu & Kamalakanta Muduli, 2023. "Enabling artificial intelligence for sustainable food grain supply chains: an agri 5.0 and circular economy perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 2104-2124, December.
    4. Nishtha Agarwal & Nitin Seth, 2021. "Analysis of supply chain resilience barriers in Indian automotive company using total interpretive structural modelling," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(5), pages 758-781, March.
    5. Kamble, Sachin S. & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Sharma, Rohit, 2020. "Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2010. "Microeconomics of Technology Adoption," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 395-424, September.
    7. Denila Jinny Arulraj & Thillai Rajan Annamalai, 2020. "Firms’ Financing Choices and Firm Productivity: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 35-48, June.
    8. C. Ganeshkumar & Sanjay Kumar Jena & A. Sivakumar & T. Nambirajan, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in agricultural value chain: review and future directions," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 379-398, December.
    9. Debesh Mishra & Kamalakanta Muduli & Lukas Sevcik & Sujoy Kumar Jana & Manidatta Ray, 2023. "Combating of Associated Issues for Sustainable Agri-Food Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Bag, Surajit & Dhamija, Pavitra & Bryde, David J. & Singh, Rajesh Kumar, 2022. "Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 60-72.
    11. Veepan Kumar & Prem Vrat & Ravi Shankar, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Implementation of Industry 4.0 for Sustainability in Manufacturing," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 453-478, December.
    12. Himani Mishra & Prateek Maheshwari, 2020. "Achieving sustainable development goals through Fourth Industrial Revolution: An Indian perspective," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 11(2), pages 63-75, May.
    13. Nishtha Agarwal & Nitin Seth, 2021. "Analysis of supply chain resilience barriers in Indian automotive company using total interpretive structural modelling," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(5), pages 758-781, March.
    14. Andrea Revell & Robert Rutherfoord, 2003. "UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 26-35, January.
    15. Schimmelpfennig, David & Ebel, Robert, 2016. "Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(01), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Zhang, Tinglong & Deveci, Muhammet & Kadry, Seifedine, 2024. "The use of AI to uncover the supply chain dynamics of the primary sector: Building resilience in the food supply chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 544-566.
    2. Slawomir Zaplata, 2024. "Tying Up Loose Ends in Organizational Resilience– Current Status and Future Directions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 714-734.
    3. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Monica Shukla & Ravi Shankar, 2024. "Impact Assessment of Smart Manufacturing System Implementation in Small and Medium Enterprises: Moderating Role of Enabling Technology and Government Support," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 533-557, September.
    5. Nishtha Agarwal & Nitin Seth, 2024. "Analysis of Supply Chain Resilience Enablers and Business Outcomes Using Delphi and Fuzzy ISM for Indian Automobile Industry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(4), pages 763-783, December.
    6. Harshad Sonar & Nikhil Ghag & Yashomandira Kharde & Shriya Ghosh, 2023. "Analysis of barriers affecting circular economy adoption in food supply chain: A strategic perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5273-5288, December.
    7. Madhukar Rajaram Patil & M. Suresh, 2023. "Engineering agility in technology IoT projects," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(6), pages 2312-2328, December.
    8. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Shuoyan He, 2024. "How does social capital affect farmers’ environment-friendly technology adoption behavior? A case study in Hubei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18361-18384, July.
    9. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    10. LoPiccalo, Katherine, 2022. "Impact of broadband penetration on U.S. Farm productivity: A panel approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    11. Sseruyange, J. & Bulte, E., 2018. "Do Incentives matter for Knowledge Diffusion? Experimental Evidence from Uganda," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275896, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Nathan D. DeLay & Nathanael M. Thompson & James R. Mintert, 2022. "Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 195-219, February.
    13. Michael J. Andrews, 2020. "Local Effects of Land Grant Colleges on Agricultural Innovation and Output," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Research and Innovation in Agriculture, pages 139-175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Bensch, Gunther & Grimm, Michael, 2024. "Behavioural constraints in energy technology uptake: Evidence from real-purchase offers in rural Rwanda and Senegal," Ruhr Economic Papers 1081, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Chen, Cheng & Senga, Tatsuro & Sun, Chang & Zhang, Hongyong, 2023. "Uncertainty, imperfect information, and expectation formation over the firm’s life cycle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 60-77.
    16. Jaryn Bradford & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2008. "Local authorities, climate change and small and medium enterprises: identifying effective policy instruments to reduce energy use and carbon emissions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 156-172, May.
    17. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    18. Chen, Shuo & Lan, Xiaohuan, 2020. "Tractor vs. animal: Rural reforms and technology adoption in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Muscillo, Alessio & Pin, Paolo & Razzolini, Tiziano & Serti, Francesco, 2018. "Does "Network Closure" Beef up Import Premium?," IZA Discussion Papers 12036, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Terrance Hurley & Jawoo Koo & Kindie Tesfaye, 2018. "Weather risk: how does it change the yield benefits of nitrogen fertilizer and improved maize varieties in sub‐Saharan Africa?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 711-723, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industry 4.0; Adoption barriers; Farmer producer organizations (FPOs); Interpretative structural modelling (ISM); Agri-food sector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijogbc:v:18:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s42943-023-00083-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.