IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjofsm/v25y2024i2d10.1007_s40171-024-00384-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Inertia and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Green Business Model, and Open Innovation in Manufacturing SMEs of Emerging Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh Tiep Le

    (Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City)

  • Muhammad Mohiuddin

    (Laval University)

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between Organizational Inertia (OI) and Firm Performance (FP) and how this relationship is mediated by Green Business Model Innovation (GBMI) and Green Open Innovation (GOIN) for manufacturing small & medium enterprises (SMEs) in emerging markets. The data were collected from 465 managers of 465 SMEs in 2021. The OI was found to have an indirect relationship with FP, and this relationship is negative and significant. Further, the two direct relationships between OIN and BMI with FP consecutively were found to be positive and significant. The contribution of this study has significant implications in the field of OI, OIN, and BMI. This study examines how adversely OI affects business innovation, particularly OIN, and BMI. In addition, this study provides a mechanism for sustaining and improving FP by promoting open innovation and developing innovative business models in the organization. This transformation leads to flexibility in the organization. This study implies how SMEs can overcome OI by focusing on managerial actions such as organizational learning, cross-functional groups, and reflective practices that generate open innovation and BMI to become sustainable and provide insights to business practitioners, entrepreneurs, and organizational directors.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh Tiep Le & Muhammad Mohiuddin, 2024. "Organizational Inertia and Firm Performance: Mediating Role of Green Business Model, and Open Innovation in Manufacturing SMEs of Emerging Markets," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(2), pages 325-341, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00384-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40171-024-00384-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-024-00384-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40171-024-00384-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingfeng Tian & Shuo Zhang & Huimin Yu & Guangming Cao, 2019. "Exploring the Factors Influencing Business Model Innovation Using Grounded Theory: The Case of a Chinese High-End Equipment Manufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Suharti Ishak & Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin & Nor Azura Mohamed Salim & Amir Imran Zainoddin & Zichun Deng, 2023. "The Effect of Supply Chain Adaptive Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Firm Performance in Malaysia's Semiconductor Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 439-458, September.
    3. John Enrique Sánchez Otero & Jaider Manuel Vega Jurado & Joaquín Alegre Vidal, 2023. "Factors that Influence the Development of Innovations with a Social Focus in the Firm: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 341-360, September.
    4. Sandeep Vij & Harpreet Singh Bedi, 2016. "Are subjective business performance measures justified?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(5), pages 603-621, June.
    5. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2008. "The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:23-32 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Robert E. Morgan & Pierre Berthon, 2008. "Market Orientation, Generative Learning, Innovation Strategy and Business Performance Inter‐Relationships in Bioscience Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1329-1353, December.
    8. Ching-Hsun Chang, 2020. "Green Open Innovation Activities and Green Co-Innovation Performance in Taiwan’s Manufacturing Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    10. Bernardo Gala-Velásquez & Américo Hurtado-Palomino & Angela Y. Arredondo-Salas, 2023. "Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 219-234, June.
    11. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    12. Saebi, Tina & Foss, Nicolai J., 2015. "Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 201-213.
    13. Dhekra Ben Amara & Hong Chen, 2021. "Evidence for the Mediating Effects of Eco-Innovation and the Impact of Driving Factors on Sustainable Business Growth of Agribusiness," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(3), pages 251-266, September.
    14. Hamelink, Martijn & Opdenakker, Raymond, 2019. "How business model innovation affects firm performance in the energy storage market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 120-127.
    15. Sandeep Vij & Harpreet Singh Bedi, 2016. "Are subjective business performance measures justified?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(5), pages 603-621, June.
    16. H. Mahesh Prabhu & Amit Kumar Srivastava, 2023. "CEO Transformational Leadership, Supply Chain Agility and Firm Performance: A TISM Modeling among SMEs," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 51-65, March.
    17. Xie, Xuemei & Fang, Liangxiu & Zeng, Saixing & Huo, Jiage, 2016. "How does knowledge inertia affect firms product innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1615-1620.
    18. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500166 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Gal, David, 2006. "A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 23-32, July.
    20. David Gal, 2006. "A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, pages 23-32, July.
    21. Abdullah Al Mamun & Syed Ali Fazal & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Zhan Su, 2019. "STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS, THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION: A STUDY AMONG MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-25, February.
    22. Julius Francis Gomes & Marika Iivari & Minna Pikkarainen & Petri Ahokangas, 2018. "Business Models as Enablers of Ecosystemic Interaction: A Dynamic Capability Perspective," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, July.
    23. Francis, Jennifer & Smith, Abbie, 1995. "Agency costs and innovation some empirical evidence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2-3), pages 383-409, April.
    24. Reinartz, Werner & Haenlein, Michael & Henseler, Jörg, 2009. "An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 332-344.
    25. Shi Yin & Nan Zhang & Baizhou Li, 2020. "Improving the Effectiveness of Multi-Agent Cooperation for Green Manufacturing in China: A Theoretical Framework to Measure the Performance of Green Technology Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-27, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés Fernández-Miguel & Fernando E. García-Muiña & Davide Settembre-Blundo & Serena Chiara Tarantino & Maria Pia Riccardi, 2024. "Exploring Systemic Sustainability in Manufacturing: Geoanthropology’s Strategic Lens Shaping Industry 6.0," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 579-600, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimple & Mamta Tripathi, 2024. "Bridging the Gap Between High-Performance Work System and Organizational Performance: Role of Organizational Agility, Transformational Leadership, and Human Resource Flexibility," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(2), pages 369-393, June.
    2. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    3. Belussi, Fiorenza & Orsi, Luigi & Savarese, Maria, 2019. "Mapping Business Model Research: A Document Bibliometric Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    4. Zhu, Xiaoxuan & Xiao, Zhenxin & Dong, Maggie Chuoyan & Gu, Jibao, 2019. "The fit between firms’ open innovation and business model for new product development speed: A contingent perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 75-85.
    5. Hossein Mahdavimazdeh & Loren Falkenberg & Madelynn Stackhouse, 2019. "The Innovation Value Canvas: A Guide To Defining Value Propositions And Target Customers For Commercialization Of Technological Innovations," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Täuscher, Karl & Laudien, Sven M., 2018. "Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 319-329.
    7. Müller, Julian M. & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2021. "The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models - A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 333-343.
    8. Soumya Varma & Nitin Singh & Ajit Patra, 2024. "Supply Chain Flexibility: Unravelling the Research Trajectory Through Citation Path Analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(2), pages 199-222, June.
    9. Haftor, Darek. M. & Climent Costa, Ricardo, 2023. "Five dimensions of business model innovation: A multi-case exploration of industrial incumbent firm’s business model transformations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Luo, Xingwu & Cao, Dongmei & Tjahjono, Benny & Adegbile, Abiodun, 2022. "Business model innovation themes of emerging market enterprises: Evidence in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1619-1630.
    11. Sara Moggi & Renata Paola Dameri, 2021. "Circular business model evolution: Stakeholder matters for a self‐sufficient ecosystem," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2830-2842, September.
    12. Elena Freisinger & Sven Heidenreich & Christian Landau & Patrick Spieth, 2021. "Business Model Innovation Through the Lens of Time: An Empirical Study of Performance Implications Across Venture Life Cycles," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 339-380, December.
    13. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    14. Shi Yin & Yuanyuan Yu & Nan Zhang, 2024. "The Effect of Digital Green Strategic Orientation On Digital Green Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Digital Green Business Model Innovation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    15. Linlin Zheng & Yashi Dong & Jineng Chen & Yuyi Li & Wenzhuo Li & Miaolian Su, 2022. "Impact of Crisis on Sustainable Business Model Innovation—The Role of Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Sena, Vania & Nocker, Manuela, 2021. "AI and Business Models: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 14(4), pages 324-397, May.
    17. Patrick Spieth & Svenja Meissner Née Schuchert, 2018. "Business Model Innovation Alliances: How To Open Business Models For Cooperation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    19. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00384-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.