IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i6d10.1007_s10668-023-04445-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with climate change: an analysis of farmers’ adoption behavior and its impact on production efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Naiping Zhu

    (Jiangsu University)

  • Jinlan Yang

    (Jiangsu University)

  • Airin Rahman

    (Jiangsu University
    Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University)

  • Md Nazirul Islam Sarker

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia
    Daffodil International University)

  • Sharmin Afrin

    (Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University)

  • Mahfuza Afroj

    (Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University
    Royal Agricultural University)

  • Md. Din Il Islam

    (Northwest A&F University)

  • R. B. Radin Firdaus

    (Universiti Sains Malaysia)

Abstract

Risk factors in farming are increasing because of widespread challenges posed by global climate change. In Bangladesh, the coastal and riverine areas are likely to be the awful victim. Local farmers have developed strategies to counteract climate challenges. While some studies have addressed local adoption behavior, few have investigated the effectiveness of these strategies. This study aims to explore the factors influencing farmers’ decisions to adopt specific strategies and the resulting effects on farm production efficiency in particular agro-climatic zones. We gathered data from 400 participants farming in these state-designated zones and assessed efficiency levels using data envelopment analysis. To evaluate the inefficiency of the coping strategies practiced by farmers, we employed a Tobit model. The two primary coping strategies were adjusting sowing times and adopting stress-tolerant crop varieties. Results revealed that experienced farmers with more years of schooling have higher adoption rate. Farm families who are suffering from the adverse effects of climate change directly on some proportion of their land and who are risk-averse show a positive correlation with adoption practices. The study also found that farmers who adjusted sowing times alone or in conjunction with other strategies showed greater efficiency across all categories, whereas farmers who solely adopted stress-tolerant varieties faced inefficiency due to the lower yields of these specific crops. Our research provides insights into how migration opportunities inversely correlate with strategy adoption, suggesting a potential threat to food security. Our findings could inform future agricultural policies aimed at maximizing efficiency and ensuring food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Naiping Zhu & Jinlan Yang & Airin Rahman & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Sharmin Afrin & Mahfuza Afroj & Md. Din Il Islam & R. B. Radin Firdaus, 2025. "Coping with climate change: an analysis of farmers’ adoption behavior and its impact on production efficiency," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13439-13459, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04445-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04445-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04445-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04445-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fengxia Dong & Jing Lu & Allen Featherstone, 2010. "Effects of Credit Constraints on Productivity and Rural Household Income in China," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 10-wp516, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Wencong Lu & Abdul Latif & Raza Ullah, 2017. "Simultaneous adoption of contract farming and off-farm diversification for managing agricultural risks: the case of flue-cured Virginia tobacco in Pakistan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(3), pages 1347-1361, April.
    3. Swati Nayak & Muhammad Ashraful Habib & Kuntal Das & Saidul Islam & Sk Mosharaf Hossain & Biswajit Karmakar & Roberto Fritsche Neto & Sankalp Bhosale & Hans Bhardwaj & Sudhanshu Singh & Mohammad Rafiq, 2022. "Adoption Trend of Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Salvatore Di Falco & Felice Adinolfi & Martina Bozzola & Fabian Capitanio, 2014. "Crop Insurance as a Strategy for Adapting to Climate Change," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(2), pages 485-504, June.
    5. Farhad Zulfiqar & Raza Ullah & Muhammad Abid & Abid Hussain, 2016. "Cotton production under risk: a simultaneous adoption of risk coping tools," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(2), pages 959-974, November.
    6. Alotaibi, Bader Alhafi & Kassem, Hazem S. & AL-Zaidi, Abdullah & Alyafrsi, Mohamad A., 2020. "Farmers’ awareness of agri-environmental legislation in Saudi Arabia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Fahad, Shah & Wang, Jianling, 2018. "Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 301-309.
    8. Phillips, Joseph M. & Marble, Robert P., 1986. "Farmer education and efficiency: a frontier production function approach," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 257-264, June.
    9. Md Abdullah Al Mamun & Sheikh Arafat Islam Nihad & Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar & Md Abdullah Aziz & Md Abdul Qayum & Rokib Ahmed & Niaz Md Farhat Rahman & Md Ismail Hossain & Md Shahjahan Kabir, 2021. "Growth and trend analysis of area, production and yield of rice: A scenario of rice security in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K M Mehedi Adnan & Liu Ying & Zeraibi Ayoub & Swati Anindita Sarker & Rashid Menhas & Feiyu Chen & Man (Mark) Yu, 2020. "Risk Management Strategies to Cope Catastrophic Risks in Agriculture: The Case of Contract Farming, Diversification and Precautionary Savings," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Adewale Isaac Olutumise, 2023. "Impact of credit on the climate adaptation utilization among food crop farmers in Southwest, Nigeria: application of endogenous treatment Poisson regression model," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Jinyu Qian & Airin Rahman & Naiping Zhu & Mohamad Alnafissa, 2025. "Climate-smart technology adoption in hazard-prone areas: does this adoption impact farm families’ food security?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. K M Mehedi Adnan & Liu Ying & Swati Anindita Sarker & Muhammad Hafeez & Amar Razzaq & Muhammad Haseeb Raza, 2018. "Adoption of Contract Farming and Precautionary Savings to Manage the Catastrophic Risk of Maize Farming: Evidence from Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Zappalà, Guglielmo, 2024. "Adapting to climate change accounting for individual beliefs," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Tran, Minh Chau & Gan, Christopher & Hu, Baiding, 2014. "Credit Constraints and Impact on Farm Household Welfare: Evidence from Vietnam’s North Central Coast region," 2014 Conference, August 28-29, 2014, Nelson, New Zealand 187495, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2020. "Crop diversity, household welfare and consumption smoothing under risk: Evidence from rural Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Charlotte Fabri & Sam Vermeulen & Steven Van Passel & Sergei Schaub, 2024. "Crop diversification and the effect of weather shocks on Italian farmers' income and income risk," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 955-980, September.
    9. Martina Bozzola & Robert Finger, 2021. "Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: evidence from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(3), pages 477-501.
    10. Haoyang Song & Jianhua Hou & Xiucai Yang & Yang Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Risk Perception Difference of Members of a Scientific Research Project Team on Information Adoption: The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Inertia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Muhammad Mobeen & Khondokar H. Kabir & Uwe A. Schneider & Tauqeer Ahmed & Jürgen Scheffran, 2025. "Climate change perception, adaptation, and constraints in irrigated agriculture in Punjab and Sindh, Pakistan," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Qianchun Dai & Kequn Cheng, 2022. "What Drives the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies? An Extension of TAM in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Samira Shayanmehr & Shida Rastegari Henneberry & Mahmood Sabouhi Sabouni & Naser Shahnoushi Foroushani, 2020. "Climate Change and Sustainability of Crop Yield in Dry Regions Food Insecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Md. Shakhawat Hossain, 2025. "Assessing smallholder farmers’ flood risk behavior and their willingness to pay for crop insurance as a risk coping strategy in northern Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(4), pages 4191-4217, March.
    15. Nepal Rastra Bank NRB, 2015. "Agricultural Credit and its Impact on Farm Productivity: A Case Study of Kailali District," Working Papers id:7055, eSocialSciences.
    16. Ghulam Raza Sargani & Yuansheng Jiang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Yun Shen & Zhao Ding & Asif Ali, 2023. "Impacts of livelihood assets on adaptation strategies in response to climate change: evidence from Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6117-6140, July.
    17. Buddhika Patalee & Glynn T. Tonsor, 2021. "Weather effects on U.S. cow‐calf production: A long‐term panel analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 838-857, October.
    18. Guimbeau, Amanda & Ji, Xinde James & Menon, Nidhiya, 2024. "Climate Shocks, Intimate Partner Violence, and the Protective Role of Climate-Resilience Projects," IZA Discussion Papers 17529, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Ismat Ara Begum & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Jeroen Buysse & Aymen Frija & Guido Van Huylenbroeck, 2012. "Contract farmer and poultry farm efficiency in Bangladesh: a data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(28), pages 3737-3747, October.
    20. F. G. Santeramo & B. K. Goodwin & F. Adinolfi & F. Capitanio, 2016. "Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 639-657, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q16 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - R&D; Agricultural Technology; Biofuels; Agricultural Extension Services
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04445-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.