IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i1d10.1007_s10668-022-02751-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the impact of organizational culture on social sustainability: a perspective of the construction industry

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Irfan

    (HITEC University)

  • Wesam Salah Alaloul

    (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

  • Maria Ghufran

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

  • Ghulam Yaseen

    (MY University)

  • Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem

    (Deakin University)

  • Abdul Hannan Qureshi

    (Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS)

  • Muhammad Bilal

    (National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST))

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how organizational culture can affect social sustainability indicators. Through an extensive review of the literature with a qualitative systems-based approach, multiple factors of organizational culture and social sustainability indicators are identified. Moreover, linkages and interdependencies among them in a complex system are generated from the data collected from 97 construction industry professionals. In total, five causal loop diagrams (CLDs) are developed in which the effect of organizational culture on social sustainability in the construction industry is illustrated. The result of a systematic analysis of content indicates the most impacting factors that incorporate the literature and industry scores. Among these factors, goal setting and teamwork orientation, respecting and caring for communities and impact assessment are most significant with scores of 0.124 and 0.126. Furthermore, to map the effect of organizational culture on social sustainability, the factors in CLD are prioritized because of their strength and speed of influence in the system. The results in CLDs highlight that respecting and caring for communities, impact assessment, awareness of social sustainability, and opportunity for skills development are the most crucial and mutually affecting factors among different loops impacted by organizational culture. Moreover, the identified CLDs indicate robust loops and resonant mechanisms which give information on different factors within the complex system and can assist decision-makers and top management to make robust strategies and policies for assessing the impact of organizational culture on social sustainability through their underlying interdependencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Irfan & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Maria Ghufran & Ghulam Yaseen & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Muhammad Bilal, 2024. "Analyzing the impact of organizational culture on social sustainability: a perspective of the construction industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1103-1133, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02751-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02751-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02751-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02751-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qudrat-Ullah, Hassan & Seong, Baek Seo, 2010. "How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2216-2224, May.
    2. Erol, Isil & Unal, Umut, 2015. "Role of Construction Sector in Economic Growth: New Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 68263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. repec:osf:inarxi:m7wqs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Reza Kiani Mavi & Denise Gengatharen & Neda Kiani Mavi & Richard Hughes & Alistair Campbell & Ross Yates, 2021. "Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    5. N. A. Ankrah & D. A. Langford, 2005. "Architects and contractors: a comparative study of organizational cultures," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 595-607.
    6. Usama Awan & Andrzej Kraslawski & Janne Huiskonen, 2018. "Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Luong Hai Nguyen & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2017. "The Impact of Project Organizational Culture on the Performance of Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Rini Mulyani Sari & Evan Nugraha, 2020. "Impact of Leadership, Organizational Culture and Communication System on Human Capital and Implication on Productivity Enhancement in Indonesian Public Sector," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 14(1), pages 471-482, December.
    9. Ackermann, Fran & Howick, Susan & Quigley, John & Walls, Lesley & Houghton, Tom, 2014. "Systemic risk elicitation: Using causal maps to engage stakeholders and build a comprehensive view of risks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 290-299.
    10. Lai, Kee-Hung, 2003. "Market orientation in quality-oriented organizations and its impact on their performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 17-34, April.
    11. Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Li, Caroline Bingxin, 2010. "How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 224-231, March.
    12. Margherita Pero & Antonella Moretto & Eleonora Bottani & Barbara Bigliardi, 2017. "Environmental Collaboration for Sustainability in the Construction Industry: An Exploratory Study in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, January.
    13. Navimipour, Nima Jafari & Milani, Farnaz Sharifi & Hossenzadeh, Mehdi, 2018. "A model for examining the role of effective factors on the performance of organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 166-174.
    14. Lisa Baudot & Jesse Dillard & Nadra Pencle, 2020. "Hybrid organizations and an ethic of accountability: the role of accountability systems in constructing responsible hybridity," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 598-626, October.
    15. Ibrahim, Ridwan Lanre & Ajide, Kazeem Bello & Omokanmi, Olatunde Julius, 2021. "Non-renewable energy consumption and quality of life: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Wang, Wei & Liu, Wenbin & Mingers, John, 2015. "A systemic method for organisational stakeholder identification and analysis using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 562-574.
    17. Bucar, Branko & Glas, Miroslav & Hisrich, Robert D., 2003. "Ethics and entrepreneurs: An international comparative study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 261-281, March.
    18. Rantesalu, Agustina & Mus, Abdul Rahman & , Mapparenta & Arifin, Zaenal & Jamali, Hisnol, 2017. "The effect of competence, motivation and organizational culture on employee performance: the mediating role of organizational commitment," INA-Rxiv m7wqs, Center for Open Science.
    19. Ayşe Banu Elmadağ & Alexander E. Ellinger, 2018. "Alleviating job stress to improve service employee work affect: the influence of rewarding," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 121-141, March.
    20. Shen, Liyin & Zhang, Zhenyu & Long, Zhijian, 2017. "Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 160-168.
    21. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-11-2019-4287 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Watson, Sharon & Weaver, Gary R., 2003. "How internationalization affects corporate ethics: formal structures and informal management behavior," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 75-93.
    23. Edwin Chan & Grace Lee, 2008. "Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 243-256, January.
    24. Beate Littig & Erich Griessler, 2005. "Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 65-79.
    25. Janna Olynick & Han Z. Li, 2020. "Organizational Culture and Its Relationship with Employee Stress, Enjoyment of Work and Productivity," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, June.
    26. Wei, Yinghong (Susan) & Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku, 2009. "The moderating role of reward systems in the relationship between market orientation and new product performance in China," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 89-96.
    27. William Shaw, 2009. "Marxism, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 565-576, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    2. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Siu-Kit Lau, 2020. "A Framework for Early Stages of Socially Sustainable Renovation of Multifamily Buildings with Occupants’ Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Luise L Langergaard, 2019. "Interpreting ‘the social’: Exploring processes of social sustainability in Danish nonprofit housing," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(5), pages 456-470, August.
    4. Tafuro, Alessandra & De Matteis, Fabio & Preite, Daniela & Costa, Antonio & Mariella, Leonardo & Treviso, Giuliana, 2019. "Social sustainability and local authorities: What is the relationship between spending commitments and social issues?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 120-132.
    5. Chisun Yoo & Sugie Lee, 2016. "Neighborhood Built Environments Affecting Social Capital and Social Sustainability in Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Dirk Gilbert & Michael Behnam, 2009. "Advancing Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Habermasian Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 215-234, October.
    7. Sultana Razia & Siti Hajar Abu Bakar Ah, 2023. "Model of social sustainability for Dhaka city, Bangladesh," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Yiwen Wang & Nadia Hanif & Noman Arshed & Muzzammil Hussain & Zeeshan Arshad & Muhammad Usman, 2024. "Synergizing social sustainability and technological innovation for carbon neutrality in OECD economies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6614-6628, December.
    9. Rakhshanda Khan, 2016. "How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-29, October.
    10. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    11. Taimaz Larimian & Arash Sadeghi, 2021. "Measuring urban social sustainability: Scale development and validation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 621-637, May.
    12. Powell, J.H. & Mustafee, N. & Chen, A.S. & Hammond, M., 2016. "System-focused risk identification and assessment for disaster preparedness: Dynamic threat analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 550-564.
    13. Mihaela Alexandra Tudor & Anamaria Filimon Benea & Stefan Bratosin, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown and Religious Mediatization of Social Sustainability. A Case Study of Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    15. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    16. Olga Stepanova & Magdalena Romanov, 2021. "Urban Planning as a Strategy to Implement Social Sustainability Policy Goals? The Case of Temporary Housing for Immigrants in Gothenburg, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Qiansong Zhang & Yingying Zhang & Taiwen Feng, 2024. "Impacts of paradox cognition and organizational unlearning on supply chain resilience: a perspective of paradox theory," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1022-1038, September.
    19. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    20. Lanre Ibrahim, Ridwan & Bello Ajide, Kazeem & Usman, Muhammad & Kousar, Rakhshanda, 2022. "Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 244-256.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02751-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.