IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i3d10.1007_s10668-022-02112-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multivariate quantitative approach for sustainability performance assessment: An upstream oil and gas company

Author

Listed:
  • Navid Salmanzadeh-Meydani

    (Amirkabir University of Technology
    University of Southern Denmark)

  • S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Seyedhamidreza Shahabi Haghighi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Kannan Govindan

    (University of Southern Denmark)

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative approach to evaluate the sustainability performance (SP) of an organization. A methodology is proposed based on principal component analysis (PCA), numerical taxonomy (NT), statistical, and cluster analysis. Related factors are determined considering sustainability dimensions, including social, economic, and environmental ones. A unique procedure is presented to commensurate the monetary factors. PCA is developed for multivariate analysis, which can rank annual records and determine factors' importance degree. NT is developed to verify and validate the results of PCA. The multivariate approach is able to rank the alternatives and simultaneously determine the importance degree of factors. An upstream oil and gas company is given as a case study. The statistical analysis showed direct relationships between the results of different analyses. In addition, the factors are categorized into two and four partitions to reduce dimensionality. The outcome-related factors are found to be of great importance for organizational SP. Furthermore, a descending SP in recent years was identified. To improve potential SP, operational planning for enhancing the performance of personnel is recommended. This paper provides intuition on the clusters obtained and why these factors affect the organizations' performance. The approach of this paper can be utilized for managers in the other industrial sectors who have access to company performance data and wish to analyze which factors are vital for company performance or hurting the company performance using the methodology presented in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Navid Salmanzadeh-Meydani & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & Seyedhamidreza Shahabi Haghighi & Kannan Govindan, 2023. "A multivariate quantitative approach for sustainability performance assessment: An upstream oil and gas company," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2777-2807, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02112-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02112-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02112-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02112-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salmanzadeh-Meydani, N. & Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T., 2019. "The causal relationship among electricity consumption, economic growth and capital stock in Iran," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1230-1256.
    2. Ammara Hussain & Ammar Oad & Munir Ahmad & Muhammad Irfan & Farhan Saqib, 2021. "Do Financial Development and Economic Openness Matter for Economic Progress in an Emerging Country? Seeking a Sustainable Development Path," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Debadyuti Das, 2018. "Sustainable supply chain management in Indian organisations: an empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5776-5794, September.
    4. Schwab, Leila & Gold, Stefan & Reiner, Gerald, 2019. "Exploring financial sustainability of SMEs during periods of production growth: A simulation study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 8-18.
    5. Kimitaka Nishitani, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects on Firms’ Economic Performance of Implementing Environmental Management Systems," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(4), pages 569-586, April.
    6. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2016. "Supply chain efficiency, value creation and the economic crisis – An empirical assessment of the European automotive industry 2002–2010," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 321-335.
    7. Baofeng Huo & Minhao Gu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2018. "Supply chain flexibility concepts, dimensions and outcomes: an organisational capability perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5883-5903, September.
    8. Hayami, Hitoshi & Nakamura, Masao & Nakamura, Alice O., 2015. "Economic performance and supply chains: The impact of upstream firms׳ waste output on downstream firms׳ performance in Japan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 47-65.
    9. Chen, Wenyi & Kucukyazici, Beste & Saenz, Maria Jesus, 2019. "On the joint dynamics of the economic and environmental performances for collective take-back systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 228-244.
    10. Liu, Qian & Zheng, Lucy, 2016. "Assessing the economic performance of an environmental sustainable supply chain in reducing environmental externalitiesAuthor-Name: Ding, Huiping," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 463-480.
    11. Dev, Navin K. & Shankar, Ravi & Swami, Sanjeev, 2020. "Diffusion of green products in industry 4.0: Reverse logistics issues during design of inventory and production planning system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Pal, Rudrajeet & Torstensson, Håkan & Mattila, Heikki, 2014. "Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises—an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 410-428.
    13. Shan, Shan & Ahmad, Munir & Tan, Zhixiong & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Man Li, Rita Yi & Kirikkaleli, Dervis, 2021. "The role of energy prices and non-linear fiscal decentralization in limiting carbon emissions: Tracking environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Fortune Ganda & Khazamula Samson Milondzo, 2018. "The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Al-Tuwaijri, Sulaiman A. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Hughes, K. II, 2004. "The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(5-6), pages 447-471.
    16. Battisti, Martina & Beynon, Malcolm & Pickernell, David & Deakins, David, 2019. "Surviving or thriving: The role of learning for the resilient performance of small firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 38-50.
    17. Arıkan, Emel & Fichtinger, Johannes & Ries, Jörg M., 2014. "Impact of transportation lead-time variability on the economic and environmental performance of inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 279-288.
    18. Juliana Araújo Alves & Lígia Torres Silva & Paula Cristina C. Remoaldo, 2015. "The Influence of Low-Frequency Noise Pollution on the Quality of Life and Place in Sustainable Cities: A Case Study from Northern Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-27, October.
    19. Mohammad Taherdangkoo & Kamran Ghasemi & Mona Beikpour, 2017. "The role of sustainability environment in export marketing strategy and performance: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1601-1629, October.
    20. Arikan, E. & Fichtinger, J. & Ries, J. M., 2014. "Impact of transportation lead-time variability on the economic and environmental performance of inventory systems," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63386, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    21. Shirali, Gh.A. & Mohammadfam, I. & Ebrahimipour, V., 2013. "A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: A case study in a process industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 88-94.
    22. Azadeh, A. & Ghaderi, S.F. & Nasrollahi, M.R., 2011. "Location optimization of wind plants in Iran by an integrated hierarchical Data Envelopment Analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1621-1631.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    2. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Wu, Zhengping & Zhai, Xin & Liu, Zhongyi, 2015. "The inventory billboard effect on the lead-time decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 45-53.
    4. Dara G. Schniederjans & Mehrnaz Khalajhedayati, 2021. "Competitive sustainability and stakeholder engagement: Exploring awareness, motivation, and capability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 808-824, February.
    5. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    6. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    7. G Capece & F Di Pillo & M Gastaldi & N Levialdi & M Miliacca, 2017. "Examining the effect of managing GHG emissions on business performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1041-1060, December.
    8. Zhuoqun Li & Weiwei Fei & Ermin Zhou & Yuvraj Gajpal & Xiding Chen, 2019. "The Impact of Lead Time Uncertainty on Supply Chain Performance Considering Carbon Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Sun, Yiqi & Wu, Zhengping & Zhu, Wanshan, 2022. "When do firms benefit from joint price and lead-time competition?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 497-517.
    10. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    11. Engebrethsen, Erna & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2019. "Transportation mode selection in inventory models: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 1-25.
    12. Julia Freis & Philipp Vohlidka & Willibald A. Günthner, 2016. "Low-Carbon Warehousing: Examining Impacts of Building and Intra-Logistics Design Options on Energy Demand and the CO 2 Emissions of Logistics Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-36, May.
    13. Shih-Hsien Tseng & Jia-Chen Yu, 2019. "Data-Driven Iron and Steel Inventory Control Policies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Francesca Di Pillo & Massimo Gastaldi & Nathan Levialdi & Michela Miliacca, 2017. "Environmental Performance Versus Economic-financial Performance: Evidence from Italian Firms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 98-108.
    15. Abdulaziz T. Almaktoom, 2017. "Stochastic Reliability Measurement and Design Optimization of an Inventory Management System," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-9, August.
    16. Nouira, Imen & Hammami, Ramzi & Frein, Yannick & Temponi, Cecilia, 2016. "Design of forward supply chains: Impact of a carbon emissions-sensitive demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 80-98.
    17. Chen, Yi-Ting & Sun, Edward W. & Chang, Ming-Feng & Lin, Yi-Bing, 2021. "Pragmatic real-time logistics management with traffic IoT infrastructure: Big data predictive analytics of freight travel time for Logistics 4.0," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    18. Munir Ahmad & Gul Jabeen & Syed Ahsan Ali Shah & Abdul Rehman & Fayyaz Ahmad & Cem Işik, 2022. "Assessing long- and short-run dynamic interplay among balance of trade, aggregate economic output, real exchange rate, and CO2 emissions in Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 7283-7323, May.
    19. Pablo Becerra & Josefa Mula & Raquel Sanchis, 2022. "Sustainable Inventory Management in Supply Chains: Trends and Further Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Zhao, Jing & Zhang, Qin, 2021. "The effect of contract methods on the lead time of a two-level photovoltaic supply chain: revenue-sharing vs. cost-sharing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02112-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.