IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/dyngam/v8y2018i4d10.1007_s13235-017-0233-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamics of Sex Ratio Evolution: The Impact of Males as Passive Gene Carriers on Multilevel Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Argasinski

    (Institute of Mathematics of Polish Academy of Sciences
    Jagiellonian University)

Abstract

In game theoretic models, it is possible that not all individuals are active players exhibiting strategies; some of them are passive carriers of the strategy genes. A nontrivial illustration of this problem is the sex ratio evolution. The classical sex ratio models can be divided into two classes. The first class contains the static strategic models related to the Dusing–Fisher–Shaw–Mohler fitness measure, based on the reproductive value of the offspring of the focal female. The second class contains the population genetic models focused on the dynamics of allele frequencies. The approaches are not fully compatible because the strategic models disregard the role of the male individuals as the passive carriers of the strategy genes. In the previous two papers in this cycle, a new synthetic model combining the strategic analysis with more rigorous genetics and considering male carriers was presented. The new model shows that sex ratio self-regulation is a complex multistage process that can be regarded as an example of multilevel selection. One of the elements of this process is the dynamic equilibrium between passive male and active female gene carriers associated with convergence of the dynamics to the manifold termed the male subpopulation equilibrium (MSE). This paper attempts to explain this phenomenon and analyse its properties. We show that sex ratio self-regulation is the by-product of the convergence of the stable sex ratios in the monomorphic subpopulations of particular gene carriers to the MSE manifold. We present a method of derivation of static fitness measures from the dynamic model based on the double-level selection process. This will lead to a new fitness measure free from the bias of the classical approach. We also show that the classical Dusing–Fisher–Shaw–Mohler fitness measure is a biased approximation of the new approach and that an alternative simple approximation of the new approach is possible.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Argasinski, 2018. "The Dynamics of Sex Ratio Evolution: The Impact of Males as Passive Gene Carriers on Multilevel Selection," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 671-695, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:dyngam:v:8:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13235-017-0233-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13235-017-0233-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13235-017-0233-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13235-017-0233-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    2. Jos. J. Schall, 2008. "Sex ratios writ small," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7195), pages 605-606, May.
    3. repec:hhs:iuiwop:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Varga, Tamás & Garay, József & Rychtář, Jan & Broom, Mark, 2020. "A temporal model of territorial defence with antagonistic interactions," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 15-35.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dufwenberg, Martin, 1997. "Some relationships between evolutionary stability criteria in games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 45-50, November.
    2. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Tom Johnston & Michael Savery & Alex Scott & Bassel Tarbush, 2023. "Game Connectivity and Adaptive Dynamics," Papers 2309.10609, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    4. Petrohilos-Andrianos, Yannis & Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2017. "Resource harvesting regulation and enforcement: An evolutionary approach," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 236-253.
    5. Philippe Jehiel, 2022. "Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium and Related Concepts:Theory, Applications, and Beyond," Working Papers halshs-03735680, HAL.
    6. Waters, George A., 2009. "Chaos in the cobweb model with a new learning dynamic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1201-1216, June.
    7. Meng Ding & Hui Zeng, 2022. "Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game in the Recycling Utilization of Sulfate-Rich Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Guohui Song & Yongbin Wang, 2021. "Mainstream Value Information Push Strategy on Chinese Aggregation News Platform: Evolution, Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Gaudeul, Alexia & Keser, Claudia & Müller, Stephan, 2021. "The evolution of morals under indirect reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 251-277.
    10. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    11. Angelo Antoci & Simone Borghesi & Marcello Galeotti, 2013. "Environmental options and technological innovation: an evolutionary game model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 247-269, April.
    12. Hui Yu & Wei Wang & Baohua Yang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Stress Effect of Cross-Regional Transfer of Resource-Exhausted Enterprises," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    13. Galor, Oded & Klemp, Marc, 2014. "The Biocultural Origins of Human Capital Formation," IZA Discussion Papers 8433, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Moreira, Helmar Nunes & Araujo, Ricardo Azevedo, 2011. "On the existence and the number of limit cycles in evolutionary games," MPRA Paper 33895, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Xie, Yunya & Zhang, Shuhua & Zhang, Zhipeng & Bu, Hongyu, 2020. "Impact of binary social status with hierarchical punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    16. Müller, Stephan, 2014. "The evolution of inequality aversion in a simplified game of life," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 219, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    17. Witte, Björn-Christopher, 2012. "Fund managers - Why the best might be the worst: On the evolutionary vigor of risk-seeking behavior," Economics Discussion Papers 2012-20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Michael Foley & Rory Smead & Patrick Forber & Christoph Riedl, 2021. "Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Weibull, Jörgen & Salomonsson, Marcus, 2005. "Natural selection and social preferences," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 588, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 27 Sep 2005.
    20. Antonio Cabrales & Giovanni Ponti, 2000. "Implementation, Elimination of Weakly Dominated Strategies and Evolutionary Dynamics," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(2), pages 247-282, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:dyngam:v:8:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s13235-017-0233-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.