IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i3d10.1007_s00180-024-01529-7.html

Quantinar: a blockchain peer-to-peer ecosystem for modern data analytics

Author

Listed:
  • Raul Bag

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
    Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Bruno Spilak

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
    Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Julian Winkel

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)

  • Wolfgang Karl Härdle

    (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
    Bucharest University of Economic Studies
    Singapore Management University
    NUS)

Abstract

The power of data and correct statistical analysis has never been more prevalent. Academics and practitioners require nowadays an accurate application of quantitative methods. Yet many branches are subject to a crisis of integrity, which is shown in an improper use of statistical models, p-hacking, HARKing, or failure to replicate results. We propose the use of a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) ecosystem based on a blockchain network, Quantinar , to support quantitative analytics knowledge paired with code in the form of Quantlets or software snippets. The integration of blockchain technology allows Quantinar to ensure fully transparent and reproducible scientific research.

Suggested Citation

  • Raul Bag & Bruno Spilak & Julian Winkel & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2025. "Quantinar: a blockchain peer-to-peer ecosystem for modern data analytics," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1361-1396, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-024-01529-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-024-01529-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-024-01529-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-024-01529-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Heckman & Sidharth Moktan, 2020. "Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(2), pages 419-470, June.
    2. Christoph Bartneck & Servaas Kokkelmans, 2011. "Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(1), pages 85-98, April.
    3. Jonathan Albright, 2017. "Welcome to the Era of Fake News," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 87-89.
    4. Jonathan Albright, 2017. "Welcome to the Era of Fake News," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 87-89.
    5. Campbell R. Harvey, 2017. "Presidential Address: The Scientific Outlook in Financial Economics," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1399-1440, August.
    6. Zharova, Alona & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Lessmann, Stefan, 2023. "Data-driven support for policy and decision-making in university research management: A case study from Germany," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 353-368.
    7. Vicente-Saez, Ruben & Martinez-Fuentes, Clara, 2018. "Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 428-436.
    8. Glenn Ellison, 2011. "Is Peer Review In Decline?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 49(3), pages 635-657, July.
    9. Stephan B Bruns & John P A Ioannidis, 2016. "p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ștefan Găman & Julian Winkel & Xiaorui Zuo & Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Daniel Traian Pele, 2026. "Quantlet: the code snippet knowledge platform," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justus Haucap, 2020. "Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Politikberatung in Deutschland: Stärken, Schwächen, Optimierungspotenzial," Springer Books, in: Dirk Loerwald (ed.), Ökonomische Erkenntnisse verständlich vermitteln, pages 45-78, Springer.
    2. Aaron M. French & Amrita George & Joshua Madden & Veda C. Storey, 2025. "Tabloids, Fake News, and the Overton Window: The COP Model on News Consumption in Uncertain Times," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 2317-2335, December.
    3. Mark Armstrong, 2021. "Plan S: An economist's perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 2017-2026, December.
    4. Johnstone, David, 2022. "Accounting research and the significance test crisis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Justus Haucap & Nima Moshgbar & W. Benedikt Schmal, 2021. "The impact of the German 'DEAL' on competition in the academic publishing market," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(8), pages 2027-2049, December.
    6. Rabishankar Giri & Sabuj Kumar Chaudhuri, 2021. "Ranking journals through the lens of active visibility," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2189-2208, March.
    7. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    9. Vîiu, Gabriel-Alexandru, 2016. "A theoretical evaluation of Hirsch-type bibliometric indicators confronted with extreme self-citation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 552-566.
    10. repec:plo:pone00:0235265 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Erik Johannesson & James A. Ohlson & Sophia Weihuan Zhai, 2024. "The explanatory power of explanatory variables," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 3053-3083, December.
    12. Abraham Itzhak Weinberg, 2025. "Hybrid Quantum-Classical Ensemble Learning for S\&P 500 Directional Prediction," Papers 2512.15738, arXiv.org.
    13. Matteo Migheli & Giovanni B. Ramello, 2014. "Open Access Journals & Academics’ Behaviour," ICER Working Papers 03-2014, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    14. Mario Fernandes & Andreas Walter, 2023. "The times they are a-changin’: profiling newly tenured business economics professors in Germany over the past thirty years," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(5), pages 929-971, July.
    15. Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Taylor, Mark P. & Wang, Zigan & Li, Yan, 2025. "On the profitability of influential carry-trade strategies: Data-snooping bias and post-publication performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    16. Pat Pataranutaporn & Nattavudh Powdthavee & Chayapatr Achiwaranguprok & Pattie Maes, 2025. "Can AI Solve the Peer Review Crisis? A Large Scale Cross Model Experiment of LLMs' Performance and Biases in Evaluating over 1000 Economics Papers," Papers 2502.00070, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    17. Daniel S. Hamermesh, 2013. "Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(1), pages 162-172, March.
    18. Filatotchev, Igor & Poulsen, Annette & Bell, R. Greg, 2019. "Corporate governance of a multinational enterprise: Firm, industry and institutional perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-8.
    19. J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz & Clara I. González & Miguel Díaz Salazar, 2026. "Designing Gender-Balanced Evaluation Committees with AI," Working Papers 2026-01, FEDEA.
    20. Justus Haucap & Johannes Muck, 2015. "What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 849-877, June.
    21. Sergey V. Popov, 2023. "Arithmetics of research specialization," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 1013-1021, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-024-01529-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.