IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/bioerq/v10y2025i1d10.1007_s41247-025-00122-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Agribusiness Better than Small-Scale Alternatives?

Author

Listed:
  • Ted Trainer

    (University of New South Wales)

Abstract

A recent study found that urban agriculture is far worse than agribusiness in its carbon emissions. This finding contradicts the common assumption that alternative forms of food production, especially those practised in urban situations, are feasible for reasons to do with sustainability. Aspects of the study leading to its conclusion are critically considered. And I argue that the study is misleading. Firstly, its findings regarding carbon emissions are questioned. More importantly, I argue that the merits of alternative agriculture require comparisons across a wide range of costs and benefits other than to do with carbon involved in the supply of food and other biological products. A consideration of several of these factors indicates that in terms of ecological, economic, and social consequences, alternative practices are far superior to agribusiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ted Trainer, 2025. "Is Agribusiness Better than Small-Scale Alternatives?," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s41247-025-00122-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s41247-025-00122-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41247-025-00122-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41247-025-00122-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:bioerq:v:10:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s41247-025-00122-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.