IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v335y2024i3d10.1007_s10479-022-04855-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust optimization model of anti-epidemic supply chain under technological innovation: learning from COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Malin Song

    (Anhui University of Finance and Economics)

  • Sai Yuan

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Hongguang Bo

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Jinbo Song

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Xiongfeng Pan

    (Dalian University of Technology)

  • Kairui Jin

    (Fudan University)

Abstract

The anti-epidemic supply chain plays an important role in the prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior research has focused on studying the facility location, inventory management, and route optimization of the supply chain by using certain parameters and models. Nevertheless, uncertainty, as a vital influence factor, greatly affects the supply chain. As such, the uncertainty that comes with technological innovation has a heightened influence on the supply chain. Few studies have explicitly investigated the influence of technological innovation on the anti-epidemic supply chain under the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, the current research aims to investigate the influences of the uncertainty caused by technological innovation on the supply chain from demand and supply, shortage penalty, and budget. This paper presents a three-level model of the anti-epidemic supply chain under technological innovation and employs an interval data robust optimization to tackle the uncertainties of the model. The findings are obtained as follows. Firstly, the shortage penalty will increase the costs of the objective function but effectively improve demand satisfaction. Secondly, if the shortage penalty is sufficiently large, the minimum demand satisfaction rate can ensure a fair distribution of materials among the affected areas. Thirdly, technological innovation can reduce costs. The technological innovation related to the transportation costs of the anti-epidemic material distribution center has a greater influence on the optimal value. Meanwhile, the technological innovation related to the transportation costs of the supplier has the least influence. Fourthly, both supply and demand uncertainty can influence costs, but demand uncertainty has a greater influence. Fifthly, the multi-scenario budgeting approach can decrease the calculation complexity. These findings provide theoretical support for anti-epidemic dispatchers to adjust the conservativeness of uncertain parameters under the influence of technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Malin Song & Sai Yuan & Hongguang Bo & Jinbo Song & Xiongfeng Pan & Kairui Jin, 2024. "Robust optimization model of anti-epidemic supply chain under technological innovation: learning from COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1331-1361, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:335:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04855-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-04855-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-04855-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-04855-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salarpour, Mojtaba & Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "A multicountry, multicommodity stochastic game theory network model of competition for medical supplies inspired by the Covid-19 pandemic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    2. Henrik Bresman, 2010. "External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 81-96, February.
    3. Chen, Kebing & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2009. "Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 225-234, August.
    4. Tang, Christopher S. & Yin, Rui, 2007. "Responsive pricing under supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 239-255, October.
    5. Meraklı, Merve & Yaman, Hande, 2016. "Robust intermodal hub location under polyhedral demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 66-85.
    6. Rameshwar Dubey & David Bryde & Constantin Blome & David Roubaud & Mihalis Giannakis, 2021. "Facilitating artificial intelligence powered supply chain analytics through alliance management during the pandemic crises in the B2B context," Post-Print hal-03233551, HAL.
    7. Chen, J. & Chen, L. & Sun, D., 2017. "Air traffic flow management under uncertainty using chance-constrained optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 124-141.
    8. Cotes, Nathalie & Cantillo, Victor, 2019. "Including deprivation costs in facility location models for humanitarian relief logistics," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 89-100.
    9. Gilani, H. & Sahebi, H. & Oliveira, Fabricio, 2020. "Sustainable sugarcane-to-bioethanol supply chain network design: A robust possibilistic programming model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    10. Gary Gereffi, 2020. "What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 287-301, September.
    11. K. T. Shibin & Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Benjamin Hazen & David Roubaud & Shivam Gupta & Cyril Foropon, 2020. "Examining sustainable supply chain management of SMEs using resource based view and institutional theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 301-326, July.
    12. Dabo Guan & Daoping Wang & Stephane Hallegatte & Steven J. Davis & Jingwen Huo & Shuping Li & Yangchun Bai & Tianyang Lei & Qianyu Xue & D’Maris Coffman & Danyang Cheng & Peipei Chen & Xi Liang & Bing, 2020. "Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(6), pages 577-587, June.
    13. Shivam Gupta & Nezih Altay & Zongwei Luo, 2019. "Big data in humanitarian supply chain management: a review and further research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1153-1173, December.
    14. Rameshwar Dubey & David James Bryde & Cyril Foropon & Gary Graham & Mihalis Giannakis & Deepa Bhatt Mishra, 2020. "Agility in humanitarian supply chain: An organizational information processing perspective and relational view," Post-Print hal-03539292, HAL.
    15. Tiaojun Xiao & Jia Luo & Jiao Jin, 2009. "Coordination of a Supply Chain with Demand Stimulation and Random Demand Disruption," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Catherine L Wang & Pervaiz K Ahmed & Mohammed Rafiq, 2008. "Knowledge management orientation: construct development and empirical validation," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 219-235, June.
    17. Shahriar Akter & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2019. "Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 939-959, December.
    18. Konstantinos Petridis, 2015. "Optimal design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under normally distributed demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 227(1), pages 63-91, April.
    19. Gurnani, Haresh & Sharma, Arun & Grewal, Dhruv, 2010. "Optimal Returns Policy under Demand Uncertainty," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 137-147.
    20. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Bettahar, Samir & Benbouziane, Mohamed, 2018. "Optimizing renewable energy portfolios under uncertainty: A multi-segment fuzzy goal programming approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 540-552.
    21. Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Stephen J. Childe & Thanos Papadopoulos & Zongwei Luo & David Roubaud, 2020. "Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 343-367, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Alamgir Hossain & Md. Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Ilias O. Pappas & Bhimaraya Metri & Laurie Hughes & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2023. "Fake news on Facebook and their impact on supply chain disruption during COVID-19," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(2), pages 683-711, August.
    2. Xiaoyan Xu & Suresh P. Sethi & Sai‐Ho Chung & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2023. "Reforming global supply chain management under pandemics: The GREAT‐3Rs framework," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 524-546, February.
    3. Josip Marić & Carlos Galera-Zarco & Marco Opazo-Basáez, 2022. "The emergent role of digital technologies in the context of humanitarian supply chains: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1003-1044, December.
    4. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    5. Rameshwar Dubey & David J. Bryde & Cyril Foropon & Gary Graham & Mihalis Giannakis & Deepa Bhatt Mishra, 2022. "Agility in humanitarian supply chain: an organizational information processing perspective and relational view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 559-579, December.
    6. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    7. Issam Laguir & Sachin Modgil & Indranil Bose & Shivam Gupta & Rebecca Stekelorum, 2023. "Performance effects of analytics capability, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain under environmental uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1269-1293, May.
    8. Abhilash Kondraganti & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy & Hossein Sharifi, 2024. "A systematic literature review on the use of big data analytics in humanitarian and disaster operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1015-1052, April.
    9. Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2020. "The impact of R&D investment on mitigating supply chain disruptions: Empirical evidence from U.S. firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Maciel M. Queiroz & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2024. "A structured literature review on the interplay between emerging technologies and COVID-19 – insights and directions to operations fields," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 937-963, April.
    11. Zhao, Yujie & Zhou, Hong & Leus, Roel, 2022. "Recovery from demand disruption: Two-stage financing strategy for a capital-constrained supply chain under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 699-718.
    12. Sabari R. Prasanna, 2022. "The role of supplier innovativeness in the humanitarian context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1359-1377, December.
    13. Xu, Qingyun & He, Yi & Shao, Zhen, 2023. "Retailer's ordering decisions with consumer panic buying under unexpected events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Cao, Kaiying & Guo, Qiang & Xu, Yuqiu, 2023. "Information sharing and carbon reduction strategies with extreme weather in the platform economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    15. Liang, Guitian & Gu, Chaocheng, 2021. "The value of target sales rebate contracts in a supply chain with downstream competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Pegah Bahrani & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh, 2020. "Competitive Environment Between Green and Non-green Products Considering Disruption and Alliance Strategy," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(2), pages 135-161, June.
    17. Zhuo, Xiaopo & Wang, Fan & Niu, Baozhuang, 2021. "Brand-owners’ vertical and horizontal alliance strategies facing dominant retailers: Effect of demand substitutability and complementarity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Manjul Gupta & Amin Shoja & Patrick Mikalef, 2022. "Toward the understanding of national culture in the success of non‐pharmaceutical technological interventions in mitigating COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1433-1450, December.
    19. M. Ali Ülkü & James H. Bookbinder & Nam Yi Yun, 2024. "Leveraging Industry 4.0 Technologies for Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains: Evidence from the Extant Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Ling, Liuyi & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "Competing OEMs’ responses to a developer's services installation and strategic update of platform quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 545-559.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:335:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-022-04855-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.