IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Реструктуризация банковской системы: пример Вьетнама // Restructuring the Banking System: the Case of Vietnam


  • T. To D.

    (Banking Academy of Vietnam)

  • Т. То Д.

    (Банковская академия Вьетнама)


This paper aims at studying the restructuring of commercial banks that has been started since 2008 in Vietnam by analysing in two angles: Efficiency and Stability of the banking system. Firstly, the paper applies a modified Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model in 2 cases to estimate the changes of the efficiency by analyse the E-scores of 26 commercial banks from 2008 to 2012 and examine the profits and productions efficiency of 7 DMUs of the Vietnamese banking system in 2 years 2011 and 2013. Secondly, this study will calculate the Z-scores and T-test by using SPSS program to assess the stability of the banking system. Moreover, this study uses quantitative and qualitative methods to assess and quantify the results of the Vietnam commercial banks’ restructuring under the Decision No. 254/QD-TTg. The results showed that Vietnamese banking system remained stable during the process and contributed to economic growth, however the results were quite limited and lacks of long-term effects, such as many restructuring objectives were not achieved thorough handling bad debt, cross-ownership, improving governance and enhance the operational efficiency of commercial banks. In particular, the major cause of these problems is due to the lack of a general approach to the overall handling of the issue of restructuring commercial banking system, particularly is missing a legal framework for the systematic implementation of the restructuring process in the context of economic restructure. В статье проанализирована реструктуризация коммерческих банков, начатая во Вьетнаме в 2008 г., с двух точек зрения: эффективности банковской системы и стабильности банковской системы. В двух случаях применена модифицированная модель анализа среды функционирования (АСФ) для оценки эффективности изменений с помощью анализа Е-рангов 26 коммерческих банков в период с 2008 по 2012 г. Проанализированы прибыль и эффективность 7 DMU банковской системы Вьетнама в период с 2011 по 2013 г. Рассчитаны Z-ранги и Т-тест для оценки стабильности банковской системы с помощью программы SPSS. Для оценки результатов реструктуризации банковской системы в соответствии с распоряжением № 254/QD-NNg применены как количественные методы оценки, так и качественные методы. Результаты анализа показали, что банковская система Вьетнама остается стабильной, содействует экономическому росту, хотя некоторые цели реструктуризации не были полностью достигнуты, например проблемы безнадежных долгов, перекрестного владения титулами собственности, повышения уровня управления, улучшения эффективности оперативной деятельности банков.

Suggested Citation

  • T. To D. & Т. То Д., 2016. "Реструктуризация банковской системы: пример Вьетнама // Restructuring the Banking System: the Case of Vietnam," Вестник исследований бизнеса и экономики // Review of Business and Economics Studies, Федеральное Государственное Образовательное Бюджетное Учреждение Высшего Образования "Финансовый Университет При Правительстве Российской Федерации" (Финансовый Университет), vol. 4(4), pages 32-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:00rbes:y:2016:i:4:p:32-54

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kahn, Charles M. & Santos, Joao A.C., 2005. "Allocating bank regulatory powers: Lender of last resort, deposit insurance and supervision," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(8), pages 2107-2136, November.
    2. Onji, Kazuki & Vera, David & Corbett, Jenny, 2012. "Capital injection, restructuring targets and personnel management: The case of Japanese regional banks," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 495-517.
    3. Miller, Stephen M. & Noulas, Athanasios G., 1996. "The technical efficiency of large bank production," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 495-509, April.
    4. Paradi, Joseph C. & Zhu, Haiyan, 2013. "A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 61-79.
    5. Ceyla Pazarbasioglu & Claudia H Dziobek, 1997. "Lessons From Systemic Bank Restructuring; A Survey of 24 Countries," IMF Working Papers 97/161, International Monetary Fund.
    6. repec:wsi:apjorx:v:30:y:2013:i:01:n:s0217595912500479 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ariff, Mohamed & Can, Luc, 2008. "Cost and profit efficiency of Chinese banks: A non-parametric analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 260-273, June.
    8. Stijn Claessens & Simeon Djankov & Daniela Klingebiel, 1999. "How to Accelerate Corporate and Financial Sector Restructuring in East Asia," World Bank Other Operational Studies 11452, The World Bank.
    9. Augustin Landier & Kenichi Ueda, 2009. "The Economics of Bank Restructuring; Understanding the Options," IMF Staff Position Notes 2009/12, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Blazy, Régis & Martel, Jocelyn & Nigam, Nirjhar, 2014. "The choice between informal and formal restructuring: The case of French banks facing distressed SMEs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 248-263.
    11. Hsiao, Hsing-Chin & Chang, Hsihui & Cianci, Anna M. & Huang, Li-Hua, 2010. "First Financial Restructuring and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1461-1471, July.
    12. Evren Damar, H., 2007. "Does post-crisis restructuring decrease the availability of banking services? The case of Turkey," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 2886-2905, September.
    13. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1979. "Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 339-338, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:00rbes:y:2016:i:4:p:32-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Алексей Скалабан). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.