IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Redistributive Effects and Cost-Effectiveness of Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage

Listed author(s):
  • John P. Formby

    (University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA)

  • John A. Bishop

    (East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA,

  • Hoseong Kim

    (University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Simulation methods are used to investigate the cost-effectiveness and poverty-reducing effects of the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 (FMWA). The data set is created by matching and merging the Annual Social and Economic Supplement (March CPS) with the Earner Study files, which contain the best available information on wages, hours, and earnings. Three 70¢ increments in the minimum wage are compared to alternative labor market policies that could have been adopted in lieu of the FMWA. Specifically, the costs of rising minimum wages are compared to the costs of equiproportionate increases in the earned income tax credit (EITC) and equiproportionate reductions in Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA)(payroll) taxes of workers in low-income families that achieve the same poverty-reducing policy objective. The FMWA simulations are expanded to evaluate a hypothetical extension of the federal minimum wage to $9.50. The overall redistributive effects of the FMWA, the hypothetical $9.50 minimum wage, and the alternative EITC and FICA labor market policies are also compared.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by in its journal Public Finance Review.

    Volume (Year): 38 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 5 (September)
    Pages: 585-618

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:38:y:2010:i:5:p:585-618
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:38:y:2010:i:5:p:585-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.