IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v26y2025i1p256-273.html

A Study on the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence, Leadership Styles and Perceived Leadership Effectiveness in Bhutan

Author

Listed:
  • Elangbam Haridev Singh
  • Namgay Dorji
  • Leki Zangmo
  • Rigyel
  • Namyel Wangchuk
  • Leki Dema Tamang
  • Nidup Zangmo

Abstract

Effective leadership is the key in every organization to face the challenges of an organization in the dynamic twenty-first century. Past studies have revealed the relationship between emotional intelligence, leadership styles and leadership effectiveness in different cultures and countries, but there is no evidence of a study in the Bhutanese context. Hence, this study is aimed at understanding the relationship between emotional intelligence, leadership styles and perceived leadership effectiveness of financial institution supervisors in Bhutan. This quantitative research is conducted with a sample of 265 supervisors using Trait Meta-Mood Scale that measures emotional intelligence and Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ5X); it also measures leadership styles of leaders in three cities, namely Thimphu, Paro and Phuentsholing. The findings of the study showed that there is a significant relationship between leadership styles and perceived leadership effectiveness and also between emotional intelligence and perceived leadership effectiveness. The implication of the findings is that emotional intelligence acts as a partial mediator for transactional leaders in making them effective but a full mediator for transformational leaders in making them effective. Further studies should be conducted in other organizations in order to generalize the findings in the context of Bhutan. These findings will help in further research in the field of emotional intelligence, the interrelationship of emotional intelligence with leadership styles and perceived leadership effectiveness, especially in the context of Bhutan.

Suggested Citation

  • Elangbam Haridev Singh & Namgay Dorji & Leki Zangmo & Rigyel & Namyel Wangchuk & Leki Dema Tamang & Nidup Zangmo, 2025. "A Study on the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence, Leadership Styles and Perceived Leadership Effectiveness in Bhutan," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 26(1), pages 256-273, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:256-273
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150920978121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150920978121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150920978121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Hassan Jafri & Chimi Dem & Sonam Choden, 2016. "Emotional Intelligence and Employee Creativity: Moderating Role of Proactive Personality and Organizational Climate," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 4(1), pages 54-66, January.
    2. Daniel R. Denison & Robert Hooijberg & Robert E. Quinn, 1995. "Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(5), pages 524-540, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin J. P. Jansen & Gerard George & Frans A. J. Van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2008. "Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 982-1007, July.
    2. Wu, Zhaohui & Steward, Michelle D. & Hartley, Janet L., 2010. "Wearing many hats: Supply managers' behavioral complexity and its impact on supplier relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 817-823, August.
    3. repec:ipg:wpaper:40 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. David Audretsch & Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada, 2023. "From entrepreneurship to leadership," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 814-820, April.
    5. Nabila Jawadi & Dominique Bonet, 2013. "An examination of the factors influencing relationship building and performance in virtual R&D project teams," Working Papers 2013-40, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    6. Madsen, Mona Toft, 2001. "Leadership and Management Theories Revisited," Working Papers 2001-5, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management.
    7. Kaciak Eugene & Kozminski Andrzej K., 2019. "Managerial Discretion and Constraints: A Bounded Leadership Model," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(2), pages 3-32, June.
    8. Robin L. Wakefield & Dorothy E. Leidner & Gary Garrison, 2008. "Research Note ---A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 434-455, December.
    9. Korzynski, Pawel & Kozminski, Andrzej Krzysztof & Baczynska, Anna & Haenlein, Michael, 2021. "Bounded leadership: An empirical study of leadership competencies, constraints, and effectiveness," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 226-235.
    10. Priya Alat & Damodar Suar, 2024. "Exploring Behavioural Complexity as the Link Between Leader Attributes and Leader Effectiveness," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 49(4), pages 615-640, November.
    11. Hongjiang Lv & Xinghua Zhao & Man Cao & Jingjing Ding, 2023. "How can managers, acting as brokers, be ambidextrous? The effect of trust brokerage on managers’ ambidexterity," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 1008-1034, July.
    12. Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto & Iliana E. Aguilar-Rodríguez & Carlos Artieda, 2021. "Organizational Culture and Corporate Performance in the Ecuadorian Environment," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Qu Yao & Yingjie Zheng & Jianhang Chen, 2024. "Sustainability in Leadership: The Implicit Associations of the First-Person Pronouns and Leadership Effectiveness Based on Word Embedding Association Test," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Jijun Gao & Pratima Bansal, 2013. "Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 241-255, January.
    15. Shao, Yan & Nijstad, Bernard A. & Täuber, Susanne, 2019. "Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 7-19.
    16. Soojin Lee & Gukdo Byun & Suzi Kim, 2021. "Effects of Coworkers’ Helping Behavior on Employees’ Knowledge Sharing and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Interactional Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Shuanglong Wang & Nathan Eva & Alexander Newman & Haihua Zhou, 2021. "A double-edged sword: the effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1305-1326, December.
    18. Constantine Andriopoulos & Marianne W. Lewis, 2009. "Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 696-717, August.
    19. Stephan, Ute & Pathak, Saurav, 2016. "Beyond cultural values? Cultural leadership ideals and entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 505-523.
    20. Willy McCourt, 2018. "Towards “cognitively complex” problem‐solving: Six models of public service reform," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 748-768, September.
    21. Helena Liu & Christopher Baker, 2016. "Ordinary Aristocrats: The Discursive Construction of Philanthropists as Ethical Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 261-277, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:26:y:2025:i:1:p:256-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.